Zoning › North Carolina › Cumberland County › Fayetteville

Fayetteville, NC Zoning

Euclidean-zoning. 19 districts · 13 overlays · 9 applicable state preemptions.

Overview

Code type
euclidean
Naming convention
lot-size-encoded

Fayetteville UDO Chapter 30 uses lot-size-encoded names for residential single-family (SF-15 = 15,000 sf min, SF-10 = 10,000 sf min, SF-6 = 6,000 sf min) and a separate MR-5 (Mixed Residential 5) for moderate-to-high density mixed residential. Business districts use functional codes (OI/NC/LC/CC/MU/BP/LI/HI/DT-1/DT-2/UC). Special districts CD/AR/MA. Three planned-development districts (PD-R, PD-EC, PD-TN). Twelve overlay districts including NPO (Noise-Accident Potential — Fort Liberty AICUZ implementation) and APO (Fayetteville Regional Airport Part 77 surfaces). Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg) directly adjacent — §30-3.C.4(d) requires any rezoning within 5 miles of the installation to be forwarded to the federal agency for review. NOTE: v1 profile incorrectly placed the UDO in 'Chapter 14' — this has been corrected to Chapter 30 throughout; the city's online code platform is EncodePlus, not Municode (Municode is a fallback mirror with Cloudflare gating). | Additional jurisdiction flags: nc-160d, aicuz-influenced, airport-influence-fra, fort-liberty-adjacent, municode-403-blocked

Worth knowing
  • [high] Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg) directly borders Fayetteville. UDO §30-3.C.4(d) requires all rezoning applications within 5 miles of the installation to be forwarded to the federal agency for review and comment. The NPO (Noise-Accident Potential Overlay) §30-3.H.5 is the locally-adopted DoD AICUZ implementation and is the dominant controlling regime in Fort-Liberty-influenced portions of the city. (cite: §30-3.C.4(d); §30-3.H.5)
  • [high] NPO caps residential density at 1 du / 5 ac (0.2 du/ac) when residential is allowed at all, and prohibits clubhouses / gathering-structures in affected zones. Effective residential density inside NPO is the minimum of the base district maximum and 0.2 du/ac — typically several orders of magnitude below SF-6 / MR-5 / DT-2 maximums. (cite: §30-3.H.5.c.1)
  • [medium] Two downtown districts (DT-1, DT-2) with distinct character. DT-1 = traditional Hay Street core, 24 ft min height, 90 ft max (up to 150 ft with active ground floor), 100% lot coverage, no front setback minimum (5 ft max), no max density. DT-2 = expanded downtown gateway, 75 ft max (up to 130 ft with active ground floor), 75% lot coverage, 20-24 du/ac. The 'min height 24 ft' in DT-1 is a quirk — most cities have only max heights. (cite: §30-3.E.10; §30-3.E.11)

+ 7 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

spec 3res_sf 3com 3ind 3res_mf 2cbd 2ag 1off 1mu 1
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
CDConservation Districtspec87,120 sf[4]35 ft[5]0.1[6]—[7]—[8]—[9]50[1] / 15[2] / 35[3]
ARAgricultural-Residential Districtag20,000 sf[13]35 ft[14]0.25[15]—[16]2[17]—[18]30[10] / 15[11] / 35[12]
MAMilitary/Airport Districtspec—[22]—[23]—[24]—[25]—[26]—[27]—[19] / —[20] / —[21]
SF-15Single-Family Residential 15res_sf15,000 sf[31]35 ft[32]0.25[33]—[34]2.9[35]—[36]30[28] / 15[29] / 35[30]
SF-10Single-Family Residential 10res_sf10,000 sf[40]35 ft[41]0.3[42]—[43]4.3[44]—[45]30[37] / 10[38] / 35[39]
SF-6Single-Family Residential 6res_sf6,000 sf[49]35 ft[50]0.4[51]—[52]7.3[53]—[54]25[46] / 10[47] / 30[48]
MR-5Mixed Residential 5res_mf4,000 sf[58]75 ft[59]0.55[60]—[61]20[62]—[63]25[55] / 10[56] / 30[57]
MHManufactured Home Districtres_mf4,000 sf[67]—[68]—[69]—[70]—[71]—[72]30[64] / 10[65] / 30[66]
OIOffice and Institutionaloff10,000 sf[76]60 ft[77]0.55[78]—[79]12[80]—[81]25[73] / 3[74] / 25[75]
NCNeighborhood Commercialcom10,000 sf[85]50 ft[86]0.55[87]—[88]24[89]—[90]10[82] / 3[83] / 10[84]
LCLimited Commercialcom15,000 sf[94]55 ft[95]0.55[96]—[97]24[98]—[99]25[91] / 3[92] / 10[93]
CCCommunity Commercialcom10,000 sf[103]75 ft[104]0.65[105]—[106]24[107]—[108]25[100] / 3[101] / 3[102]
MUMixed-Usemu10,000 sf[112]60 ft[113]0.65[114]—[115]32[116]—[117]10[109] / 10[110] / 10[111]
BPBusiness Parkind50,000 sf[121]100 ft[122]0.85[123]—[124]—[125]—[126]40[118] / 30[119] / 30[120]
LILight Industrialind20,000 sf[130]90 ft[131]0.65[132]—[133]—[134]—[135]50[127] / 15[128] / 20[129]
HIHeavy Industrialind40,000 sf[139]90 ft[140]0.75[141]—[142]—[143]—[144]50[136] / 15[137] / 20[138]
DT-1Downtown 1cbd—[147]90 ft[148]1[149]—[150]—[151]—[152]— / 0[145] / 0[146]
DT-2Downtown 2cbd—[155]75 ft[156]0.75[157]—[158]20[159]—[160]— / 3[153] / 3[154]
UCUniversities and Collegesspec435,600 sf[164]75 ft[165]0.7[166]—[167]—[168]—[169]25[161] / 3[162] / 20[163]

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

NPO
Noise-Accident Potential Overlay (Fort Liberty AICUZ)
MIL
§30-3.H.5 (Noise-Accident Potential Overlay (NPO) District)

Lands within Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg) AICUZ noise contours and Accident Potential Zones (APZs) as adopted on the Official Zoning Map. Fort Liberty borders the western/northwestern portion of the city — NPO is the locally-adopted DoD AICUZ implementation. Per §30-3.C.4(d), all rezoning applications within 5 miles of Fort Bragg are forwarded to the federal installation for review and comment.

residential_use_policydiscouraged; allowed only on strong demonstration of need
max_residential_density_du_ac_if_allowed0.2
max_residential_density_basis1 dwelling unit per 5 acres (§30-3.H.5.c.1)
clubhouses_or_gathering_structures_allowedFalse
passive_recreation_allowedTrue
noise_reduction_level_dB_options20; 25; 30; 35
nlr_applies_toportions of structures where the public is received
compatible_use_density_cap_persons_per_acre_per_hour_24h_avg25
compatible_use_density_cap_persons_per_acre_peak50
underlying_zoning_supersessionNPO standards supersede the underlying base district where conflict exists
APO
Airport Overlay (Fayetteville Regional Airport — Part 77)
AP
§30-3.H.6 (Airport Overlay (APO) District); Ord. No. S2023-021

All lands within the Airport Overlay District boundary on the Official Zoning Map (digital layer), surrounding Fayetteville Regional Airport (FAY). Includes Approach, Transitional, Conical, and Horizontal zones per FAA 14 CFR Part 77 imaginary surfaces; subdistrict includes the Airport Entrance Corridor (parcels abutting Airport Road between Gillespie Street and the airport).

faa_form_7460_1_required_before_building_permitTrue
approach_zone_slope_runway_4_2250:1
approach_zone_slope_runway_10_2850:1
transitional_zone_slope7:1
conical_zone_slope20:1
horizontal_zone_height_above_airport_elevation_ft150
horizontal_zone_height_msl_ft190
structure_or_tree_under_35_ft_exempt_unless_terrain_extends_above_faa_limitTrue
manufactured_homes_prohibited_in_airport_entrance_corridorTrue
non_conforming_obstruction_50pct_demo_or_decay_disallows_replacement_exceeding_height_limitTrue
off_airport_land_use_plan_reference2023 Off-Airport Land Use Plan
HAO
Hospital Area Overlay (Cape Fear Valley Hospital)
COR
§30-3.H.2 (Hospital Area Overlay (HAO) District); Ord. No. S2024-014/015

Boundary as shown on the map included on the Introduction page of Appendix 7.4 of the Hospital Area Plan (as amended by zoning case P14-40F, 11/24/2014). Applies to nonresidential development around Cape Fear Valley Hospital.

min_lot_size_sf20000
min_lot_size_administrative_adjustment_pct-10
front_yard_build_to_line_ft10
front_yard_build_to_line_max_admin_adj_ft15
office_parking_spaces_per_1000_sf_floor_area3
height_within_50ft_of_sf_lot_line_max_stories_or_ft2 stories / 35 ft (pitched roof required)
height_50_to_100ft_from_sf_lot_line_max_stories_or_ft3 stories / 45 ft (pitched roof required)
height_over_100ft_from_sf_lot_line_max_stories4+ stories, flat or pitched
minimum_landscape_planted_pct_of_site_area10
residential_buffer_typeType D
residential_buffer_width_ft10
residential_buffer_screen_min_height_ft_at_planting2
residential_buffer_screen_target_height_ft_within_5yr25
sidewalk_min_width_ft5
sup_required_within_100ft_of_sf_dwellingTrue
HLO
Historic/Landmark Overlay
HP
§30-3.H.3 (Historic/Landmark Overlay (HLO) District); Ord. No. S2025-002

Locally-designated Historic Districts and Local Historic Landmarks as mapped on the Official Zoning Map. Designation requires NC State Historic Preservation Office review and recommendation prior to City Council approval per §30-3.H.3.b.

certificate_of_appropriateness_required_for_exterior_alteration_or_demolitionTrue
design_review_authorityHistoric Resources Commission
review_guidelines_localDesign Standards for Fayetteville's Historic Districts and Local Landmarks (adopted by HRC and City Council)
review_guidelines_state_projectsSecretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (used for State of NC project applications)
demolition_by_neglect_enforcedTrue
demolition_by_neglect_notice_period_max_days30
temporary_window_door_boarding_requires_coa_after_one_monthTrue
shpo_review_period_days30
section_160d_702_exception_appliesTrue
MHO
Manufactured Home Overlay
SPEC
§30-3.H.4 (Manufactured Home Overlay (MHO) District)

Areas where manufactured homes are accommodated as overlay-permitted use atop base-district zoning, as mapped on the Official Zoning Map.

purposepermit manufactured-home siting where allowed by overlay regardless of base district silence
interaction_with_nc_160d_910MHO operates within the NC §160D-910 non-exclusion + parity-with-site-built framework
SHO
Special Highway Overlay
COR
§30-3.H.7 (Special Highway Overlay (SHO) District) [body placeholder]

Designated highway corridors as mapped on the Official Zoning Map. Section body is placeholder in the codified UDO at retrieval time.

applicabilitydesignated highway corridors
status_in_udoplaceholder section — corridor standards not yet codified in §30-3.H.7
MCO
Murchison Road Corridor Overlay
COR
§30-3.H.8 (Murchison Road Corridor Overlay (MCO) District) [body placeholder]

Murchison Road corridor as mapped on the Official Zoning Map. Section body is placeholder in the codified UDO at retrieval time.

applicabilityMurchison Road corridor
status_in_udoplaceholder section — corridor standards not yet codified in §30-3.H.8
NCO
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay
CON
§30-3.H.9 (Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO) District)

City-Council-designated established neighborhoods. Eligibility requires ≥65% developed area (excluding ROW) plus distinctive cohesive features (scale, lot layout, streetscape, land-use pattern, or historic district adjacency) per §30-3.H.9.c.

minimum_developed_pct_for_designation65
expansion_trigger_pct_footprint_increase25
designation_requires_area_planTrue
districts_may_specifylot_size; building_location; setbacks; building_height; building_size; orientation; exterior_materials_and_colors; roof_line_and_pitch; foundation_treatment; landscaping_screening; impervious_surface_coverage; paving; exterior_lighting; front_facade_features; uses; view_corridors; riparian_wetland_drainage_protection; demolition
section_160d_702_exceptionDesign standards under NCO are subject to NC §160D-702 preemption on 1-2 family detached dwellings unless the area also carries a Local Historic Overlay designation
CFRO
Cape Fear River Overlay
ENV
§30-3.H.10 (Cape Fear River Overlay (CFRO) District); Ord. No. S2016-004

Lands on both sides of the Cape Fear River within the corporate limits, as established by amendment to the Official Zoning Map. Includes a 'River Village' subdistrict. Single- and two-family individual uses are excepted from the overlay.

river_setback_buffer_ft_from_top_of_bank100
buffer_required_for_new_development_on_abutting_lotsTrue
buffer_uses_allowedtrails; facilities directly related to River access; uses consistent with CD Conservation District purpose
selective_pruning_diseased_or_invasive_allowedTrue
river_village_subdistrict_setback_reduction_via_trcTrue
single_two_family_individual_uses_exceptedTrue
prohibited_usesAdult entertainment; Asphalt plants; Businesses manufacturing or storing H1 hazardous materials (NC State Building Code); Chemical storage facilities; Detention centers, jails, and related correctional facilities; Gas manufacturing; Hazardous waste management facilities; Manufacture or storage of ammunition, dynamite, or other high explosives; Mining; Outdoor storage as a principal use; Salvage yards; Slaughter houses
CTO
Coliseum Tourism Overlay
COR
§30-3.H.11 (Coliseum Tourism Overlay (CTO) District)

Tourism-oriented overlay surrounding Crown Coliseum complex; geographic boundary on Official Zoning Map.

purposetourism, visitor-accommodation, and commercial-recreation use facilitation around Crown Coliseum
RACO
Regional Activity Center Overlay
SPEC
§30-3.H.12 (Regional Activity Center Overlay District)

Designated regional activity centers as mapped on the Official Zoning Map.

purposepromote mixed-use, higher-intensity regional activity centers
SACO
Suburban Activity Center Overlay
SPEC
§30-3.H.13 (Suburban Activity Center Overlay (SACO) District)

Designated suburban activity centers as mapped on the Official Zoning Map.

purposepromote mixed-use suburban activity centers at moderate intensity
FLOOD
Floodplain — NFIP Adopted
FP
§30-3.H.10.d (CFRO river buffer) + Article 30-5 floodplain (retrieval pending)

FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA — Zones AE, A, X-shaded) per the effective Cumberland County FIRM panels covering the Fayetteville municipal boundary. Cape Fear River and tributaries (Rockfish Creek, Blounts Creek, Cross Creek, Little Cross Creek) generate substantial SFHA coverage; significant flood events in 2016 (Hurricane Matthew) and 2018 (Hurricane Florence) reshaped local floodplain management practice.

nfip_participatingTrue
section_160d_702_c1_nfip_exception_appliesTrue
substantial_improvement_threshold_pct50
cfro_river_buffer_ft_from_top_of_bank100

State preemptions

NCGS § 160D-702 — Design-element preemption (1-2 family detached)applies
Qualifying condition
Self-executing statewide. Fayetteville has 1- and 2-family detached residential structures in AR, SF-15, SF-10, SF-6, MR-5, OI, DT-2 and other districts. §160D-702 preempts city-imposed building-design elements (exterior cladding, roof pitch, porch, window style, garage door, color, ornamentation) on those structures absent an exception hook.
Effect
Fayetteville may not enforce architectural standards on 1-2 family detached homes EXCEPT where: (a) the structure is in the §30-3.H.3 Historic/Landmark Overlay (HLO), (b) the structure is NFIP-regulated under the city floodplain overlay (NC §160D-702(c)(1)), (c) the standards are voluntarily agreed to as a Conditional Zoning condition, (d) the parcel is in the National-Register / Certified Local Government program, or (e) MH HUD-Code parity under §160D-910, or (f) affordable-housing 24 CFR 92.252 ≤20% cost-add exception. NCO design standards on 1-2 family detached are PREEMPTED unless paired with an HLO or other §160D-702(c) exception hook.
NC S.L. 2023-108 (HB 409) — Statewide ADU mandateapplies
Qualifying condition
Fayetteville permits SF detached as the principal residential use in AR, SF-15, SF-10, SF-6, and MR-5 districts. SF-10 §30-3.D.3 narrative explicitly lists accessory dwellings up to 800 sf as a complementary residential use. SL 2023-108 requires ≥1 ADU by-right wherever SF detached is permitted, without owner-occupancy, CUP, additional off-street parking, or separate utility-connection requirements. Inputs: {"sf_detached_permitted_districts":["AR", "SF-15", "SF-10", "SF-6", "MR-5", "OI (SF attached/detached subcategory)", "NC (SF dwellings subcategory)", "DT-2 (SF attached/detached subcategory)"], "udo_adu_explicit_mention":"\u00a730-3.D.3 narrative for SF-10 lists 'accessory dwellings of up to 800 square feet in size' among complementary uses", "as_of_vintage":"2026-05-22 retrieval of UDO via EncodePlus", "statute_threshold":"SF detached permitted -> ADU must be by-right with no CUP, owner-occupancy, parking, or separate-utility add-on"}
Effect
Any Fayetteville UDO requirement to (a) obtain a Special Use Permit / CUP for an ADU, (b) require owner-occupancy of the primary dwelling, (c) require an additional off-street parking space tied to the ADU, or (d) require separate utility connection is facially preempted. The 800 sf size cap in SF-10 narrative is more permissive than the statewide floor and remains city-imposed. Verification of by-right ADU status in §30-4 use table is partial and pending Article 30-4 retrieval.
Retrieval issue
Article 30-4 (Use Standards) full retrieval pending — by-right vs. SUP status of ADU per district requires Table 30-4.A.2 inspection beyond the row excerpt retrieved.
NCGS § 160D-1207(c) — STR registration preemption (Schroeder v. Wilmington, 2021)applies
Qualifying condition
Schroeder v. City of Wilmington (NCCOA 2021) is binding statewide. No Fayetteville STR permit/registration chapter surfaced in §30-4 retrieval excerpt; STR may be regulated as a use category but not via permit/registration/inspection as a precondition of operation.
Effect
Fayetteville may not require permit / registration / inspection as a precondition of short-term rental use. Zoning of STR as a permitted use by district remains within local authority.
NCGS § 160D-907 — Family care homes (≤6 residents)applies
Qualifying condition
Fayetteville has residential districts (AR, SF-15, SF-10, SF-6, MR-5) where family care homes (≤6 residents) must be treated as a permitted residential use. The half-mile dispersion provision may apply.
Effect
Family care homes ≤6 residents must be permitted as-of-right in all Fayetteville residential districts; the 0.5-mile dispersion may be enforced.
NCGS § 160D-910 — Manufactured housing non-exclusion + HUD-Code parityapplies
Qualifying condition
Fayetteville is a NC municipality subject to the §160D-910 non-exclusion rule and HUD-Code appearance-standard parity requirement. The MH district (§30-3.D.6) and MHO overlay (§30-3.H.4) are the city's compliance hooks.
Effect
Fayetteville may not exclude manufactured homes jurisdiction-wide; appearance standards applied to MH must not be more restrictive than those applied to site-built homes in the same district. The §30-3.H.6.c.2.a prohibition on manufactured homes in the Airport Entrance Corridor (Airport Road between Gillespie and FAY) is a corridor-specific safety overlay, NOT a jurisdiction-wide exclusion, and survives §160D-910 scrutiny as airport-safety regulation.
NCGS § 160D-914 — Residential rooftop solar protectionapplies
Qualifying condition
Fayetteville has 1-2 family detached residential structures in AR/SF-15/SF-10/SF-6/MR-5 where rooftop solar is regulated. §160D-914 limits city regulation to street-visible installations; rear/side-roof slopes cannot be prohibited.
Effect
Fayetteville may regulate only street-visible rooftop solar installations on 1-2 family detached; cannot prohibit rear/side-roof solar.
NCGS § 160D-921 — Tree ordinance requires local actapplies
Qualifying condition
No Fayetteville-specific local act authorizing a tree-protection ordinance has surfaced in NCGA local-act search. Article 30-5.B (landscaping) parameters survive as buffer / landscape-screen standards without tree-removal-permit teeth, but any tree-removal-permit program would be unenforceable absent local-act authority.
Effect
Fayetteville's landscape buffer and street-tree standards in Article 30-5.B remain enforceable as buffer requirements; any tree-removal-permit or tree-protection-permit program (separate from buffer planting) requires local-act authorization.
NCGS § 160D-903 — Bona fide farm exemptionapplies
Qualifying condition
Fayetteville's AR Agricultural-Residential district accommodates agricultural uses (§30-3.C.3). Bona fide farms are exempt from zoning regulations under §160D-903 within the AR district and elsewhere where agricultural use occurs.
Effect
Bona fide farms in Fayetteville are exempt from UDO zoning regulations (the AR district's allowance is moot for true bona fide farm operations).
NC GS Chapter 160D — Unified local planning/development statuteapplies
Qualifying condition
All NC municipalities with planning/zoning authority operate under Chapter 160D effective 2021-07-01. Fayetteville's UDO Chapter 30 is the 160D-conformant implementation.
Effect
Chapter 30 UDO procedures (rezoning, special-use permit, conditional zoning, variance) operate within the 160D framework; vested-rights rules under §160D-108 control.

Adopted building codes

Statewide

IBC
2021
IRC
2015
NEC
2020
IFC
2021
IECC (Residential)
2021
IECC (Commercial)
2021

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Amendment history

DateKindCitation
2026-05-22retrieved atretrieval timestamp — EncodePlus current-through pull
2025-02-24amendment effectiveArticle 30-3 effective-on footer block, §30-3.H.3 — Ord. No. S2025-002
2011-11-28codification startOrd. No. S2011-014 cited throughout Article 30-3 as UDO recodification base — Chapter 30 UDO (consolidates legacy Chapter 14 zoning + subdivision)

Quirks & notes

  • [high] Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg) directly borders Fayetteville. UDO §30-3.C.4(d) requires all rezoning applications within 5 miles of the installation to be forwarded to the federal agency for review and comment. The NPO (Noise-Accident Potential Overlay) §30-3.H.5 is the locally-adopted DoD AICUZ implementation and is the dominant controlling regime in Fort-Liberty-influenced portions of the city. (cite: §30-3.C.4(d); §30-3.H.5)
  • [high] NPO caps residential density at 1 du / 5 ac (0.2 du/ac) when residential is allowed at all, and prohibits clubhouses / gathering-structures in affected zones. Effective residential density inside NPO is the minimum of the base district maximum and 0.2 du/ac — typically several orders of magnitude below SF-6 / MR-5 / DT-2 maximums. (cite: §30-3.H.5.c.1)
  • [medium] Two downtown districts (DT-1, DT-2) with distinct character. DT-1 = traditional Hay Street core, 24 ft min height, 90 ft max (up to 150 ft with active ground floor), 100% lot coverage, no front setback minimum (5 ft max), no max density. DT-2 = expanded downtown gateway, 75 ft max (up to 130 ft with active ground floor), 75% lot coverage, 20-24 du/ac. The 'min height 24 ft' in DT-1 is a quirk — most cities have only max heights. (cite: §30-3.E.10; §30-3.E.11)
  • [high] Cape Fear River Overlay (CFRO) §30-3.H.10 imposes a 100 ft river setback buffer from top of bank, prohibits 12 specific use categories (adult entertainment, asphalt plants, H1-hazmat storage, chemical storage, jails, hazardous waste, ammunition/explosives manufacture, mining, outdoor storage as principal, salvage yards, slaughter houses, gas manufacturing), and excepts single/two-family individual uses. Hurricane Matthew (2016) and Hurricane Florence (2018) significantly reshaped local floodplain practice in this drainage. (cite: §30-3.H.10.d)
  • [high] Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO) §30-3.H.9 design standards are categorically preempted by NC §160D-702 on 1-2 family detached residential structures unless paired with an HLO designation or other §160D-702(c) exception hook. The UDO publishes the NCO toolbox of design standards (lot size, height, building size, orientation, exterior materials, roof line, front-facade features, color) but their enforceability against 1-2 family detached is limited. (cite: §30-3.H.9.e; NCGS §160D-702)
  • [medium] Manufactured homes are prohibited along Airport Road between Gillespie Street and Fayetteville Regional Airport (the Airport Entrance Corridor) per §30-3.H.6.c.2.a-c. This is an APO-driven safety corridor, NOT a jurisdiction-wide manufactured-home exclusion (which would violate NC §160D-910). (cite: §30-3.H.6.c.2.a)
  • [medium] Two corridor overlays (SHO Special Highway Overlay §30-3.H.7; MCO Murchison Road Corridor Overlay §30-3.H.8) appear in the UDO TOC but their substantive bodies read '[Placeholder]' in the current codified text. Map districts may exist on the Official Zoning Map but enforcement of corridor-specific standards is limited until §30-3.H.7 and §30-3.H.8 are populated. (cite: §30-3.H.7; §30-3.H.8)
  • [low] Three planned-development district types (PD-R Residential, PD-EC Economic Center, PD-TN Traditional Neighborhood) operate under §30-3.G with their own master-plan-driven dimensional standards rather than the base-district tables. PDs are NOT enumerated here as separate base districts in the dimensional inventory — they are negotiated case-by-case via the master plan process per §30-3.G.2. (cite: §30-3.G.2; §30-3.G.3; §30-3.G.4; §30-3.G.5)
  • [high] v1 profile (2026-04-07) incorrectly labeled the UDO as 'Chapter 14' and listed fabricated/templated dimensional values (5,000/35/0.5/25/25/10 pattern across most districts) and invented district codes (RSF-9, RSF-7.5, RMF-8/12/16, NC, GC, HC, OP, DB, LI, GI, HI, TOD, FBC). Correct UDO location is Chapter 30; correct base residential district codes are SF-15, SF-10, SF-6, MR-5, MH; correct business district codes are OI, NC, LC, CC, MU, BP, LI, HI, DT-1, DT-2, UC. v1 also fabricated a 'Military Compatibility' overlay with multiplier parameters — the actual overlay is NPO with verbatim density caps and noise-reduction-level options. This v2 record corrects all of these. (cite: Chapter 30 UDO; v1 profile dated 2026-04-07)
  • [low] Online code platform is EncodePlus (online.encodeplus.com/regs/fayetteville-nc), not Municode. Municode (library.municode.com/nc/fayetteville) is a mirror and returns HTTP 403 Cloudflare to scripted access — use the EncodePlus city-hosted PDF export endpoint as primary retrieval. (cite: online.encodeplus.com/regs/fayetteville-nc)

Formulas

Definitions

height
Grade to highest point of structure.
lot_coverage
Building footprint / lot area.
far
Gross floor area / lot area.
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross acre.
setback_front
Front property line to nearest building face.
setback_side
Side property line to nearest building face.
setback_rear
Rear property line to nearest building face.
parking
Spaces per dwelling unit unless noted.

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far
buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2
buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft
max_stories_approx
max_height_ft / 10
npo_effective_density
min(base_du_ac, 0.2) // NPO §30-3.H.5.c.1 caps residential at 1 du / 5 ac when allowed at all

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

—
—
Sort by —
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
◄
prev
►
next
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Primary source
City of Fayetteville UDO — Chapter 30 (Articles 30-1 through 30-9)
Current through Ord. No. S2025-002 (02/24/2025) on EncodePlus; subsequent amendments through 2026-05-22 captured as posted · retrieved 2026-05-22

Primary retrieval via EncodePlus PDF export (export2doc.aspx?pdf=1&tocid=005.030.003) returned a 5.9 MB Article 30-3 export — extracted via pdftotext. Municode mirror returned HTTP 403 (Cloudflare). The EncodePlus city-hosted endpoint served clean PDF without gating. Use this endpoint as primary, Municode as fallback.

Citations
  1. [1] §30-3.C.2
  2. [2] §30-3.C.2
  3. [3] §30-3.C.2
  4. [4] §30-3.C.2
  5. [5] §30-3.C.2
  6. [6] §30-3.C.2
  7. [7] n
  8. [8] n
  9. [9] §30-5.A
  10. [10] §30-3.C.3
  11. [11] §30-3.C.3
  12. [12] §30-3.C.3
  13. [13] §30-3.C.3
  14. [14] §30-3.C.3
  15. [15] §30-3.C.3
  16. [16] n
  17. [17] §30-3.C.3
  18. [18] §30-5.A
  19. [19] n
  20. [20] n
  21. [21] n
  22. [22] n
  23. [23] n
  24. [24] n
  25. [25] n
  26. [26] n
  27. [27] n
  28. [28] §30-3.D.2
  29. [29] §30-3.D.2
  30. [30] §30-3.D.2
  31. [31] §30-3.D.2
  32. [32] §30-3.D.2
  33. [33] §30-3.D.2
  34. [34] n
  35. [35] §30-3.D.2
  36. [36] §30-5.A
  37. [37] §30-3.D.3
  38. [38] §30-3.D.3
  39. [39] §30-3.D.3
  40. [40] §30-3.D.3
  41. [41] §30-3.D.3
  42. [42] §30-3.D.3
  43. [43] n
  44. [44] §30-3.D.3
  45. [45] §30-5.A
  46. [46] §30-3.D.4
  47. [47] §30-3.D.4
  48. [48] §30-3.D.4
  49. [49] §30-3.D.4
  50. [50] §30-3.D.4
  51. [51] §30-3.D.4
  52. [52] n
  53. [53] §30-3.D.4
  54. [54] §30-5.A
  55. [55] §30-3.D.5
  56. [56] §30-3.D.5
  57. [57] §30-3.D.5
  58. [58] §30-3.D.5
  59. [59] §30-3.D.5
  60. [60] §30-3.D.5
  61. [61] n
  62. [62] §30-3.D.5
  63. [63] §30-5.A
  64. [64] §30-3.D.6
  65. [65] §30-3.D.6
  66. [66] §30-3.D.6
  67. [67] §30-3.D.6
  68. [68] n
  69. [69] n
  70. [70] n
  71. [71] §30-3.D.6
  72. [72] §30-5.A
  73. [73] §30-3.E.2
  74. [74] §30-3.E.2
  75. [75] §30-3.E.2
  76. [76] §30-3.E.2
  77. [77] §30-3.E.2
  78. [78] §30-3.E.2
  79. [79] n
  80. [80] §30-3.E.2
  81. [81] §30-5.A
  82. [82] §30-3.E.3
  83. [83] §30-3.E.3
  84. [84] §30-3.E.3
  85. [85] §30-3.E.3
  86. [86] §30-3.E.3
  87. [87] §30-3.E.3
  88. [88] n
  89. [89] §30-3.E.3
  90. [90] §30-5.A
  91. [91] §30-3.E.4
  92. [92] §30-3.E.4
  93. [93] §30-3.E.4
  94. [94] §30-3.E.4
  95. [95] §30-3.E.4
  96. [96] §30-3.E.4
  97. [97] n
  98. [98] §30-3.E.4
  99. [99] §30-5.A
  100. [100] §30-3.E.5
  101. [101] §30-3.E.5
  102. [102] §30-3.E.5
  103. [103] §30-3.E.5
  104. [104] §30-3.E.5
  105. [105] §30-3.E.5
  106. [106] n
  107. [107] §30-3.E.5
  108. [108] §30-5.A
  109. [109] §30-3.E.6
  110. [110] §30-3.E.6
  111. [111] §30-3.E.6
  112. [112] §30-3.E.6
  113. [113] §30-3.E.6
  114. [114] §30-3.E.6
  115. [115] n
  116. [116] §30-3.E.6
  117. [117] §30-5.A
  118. [118] §30-3.E.7.A.B
  119. [119] §30-3.E.7.A.B
  120. [120] §30-3.E.7.A.B
  121. [121] §30-3.E.7.A.B
  122. [122] §30-3.E.7.A.B
  123. [123] §30-3.E.7.A.B
  124. [124] n
  125. [125] n
  126. [126] §30-5.A
  127. [127] §30-3.E.8
  128. [128] §30-3.E.8
  129. [129] §30-3.E.8
  130. [130] §30-3.E.8
  131. [131] §30-3.E.8
  132. [132] §30-3.E.8
  133. [133] n
  134. [134] n
  135. [135] §30-5.A
  136. [136] §30-3.E.9
  137. [137] §30-3.E.9
  138. [138] §30-3.E.9
  139. [139] §30-3.E.9
  140. [140] §30-3.E.9
  141. [141] §30-3.E.9
  142. [142] n
  143. [143] n
  144. [144] §30-5.A
  145. [145] §30-3.E.10
  146. [146] §30-3.E.10
  147. [147] n
  148. [148] §30-3.E.10
  149. [149] §30-3.E.10
  150. [150] n
  151. [151] n
  152. [152] §30-5.A
  153. [153] §30-3.E.11
  154. [154] §30-3.E.11
  155. [155] n
  156. [156] §30-3.E.11
  157. [157] §30-3.E.11
  158. [158] n
  159. [159] §30-3.E.11
  160. [160] §30-5.A
  161. [161] §30-3.E.12
  162. [162] §30-3.E.12
  163. [163] §30-3.E.12
  164. [164] §30-3.E.12
  165. [165] §30-3.E.12
  166. [166] §30-3.E.12
  167. [167] n
  168. [168] n
  169. [169] §30-5.A

Research status

Publication gates

primary url presentpassedsource.primary_url = https://online.encodeplus.com/regs/fayetteville-nc/doc-viewer.aspx?tocid=005.030 — EncodePlus city-hosted official codification, https, not an aggregator. Fallback Municode mirror is also non-aggregator.
no aggregator citedpassedScan clean — all citations point to Fayetteville UDO §30-* sections, NCGS §160D-* sections, NC Session Law citations, FAA 14 CFR Part 77, and Census Bureau. No Zoneomics, Steadily, SitePlanGuide, SitePlanCreator, Propwire, Zonara, or Unzoned citations anywhere in record or narrative.
confidence tags full formpassedAll confirmed standards carry c§30-3.X.Y form (e.g., c§30-3.D.3, c§30-3.E.10, c§30-3.H.5.c.1). Partial claims carry p§ or explicit 'na' with reason. ~58 confirmed-with-citation field-values verified across 18 districts and 13 overlays.
overlays have parameters trigger confidencepassedAll 13 overlays (NPO, APO, HAO, HLO, MHO, SHO, MCO, NCO, CFRO, CTO, RACO, SACO, FLOOD) carry non-empty parameters{}, explicit geographic_trigger, status, and citation. Six overlays marked 'partial' carry what_is_confirmed + what_is_missing companion fields per FM-8.
preempt section city specificpassedstate_preemptions_applicable[] contains 9 NC-specific entries (NCGS §160D-702, SL 2023-108, NCGS §160D-1207(c), §160D-907, §160D-910, §160D-914, §160D-921, §160D-903, Chapter 160D). Each carries Fayetteville-specific qualifying_condition_checked narrative — not link-stubs. SL 2023-108 marked under_review with paired qualifying_condition_checked_inputs + retrieval_failure_reason per FM-8.

Data quality

72%completeness58 confirmed6 partial
Documented gaps
  • Article 30-4 use-table by-right ADU verification pending direct Table 30-4.A.2 retrieval
  • Article 30-5.A parking ratios per use category pending Table 30-5.A.4.b retrieval
  • FLOOD freeboard exact ft above BFE pending Article 30-5 floodplain retrieval
  • MHO / SHO / MCO / CTO / RACO / SACO substantive bodies — partial; six overlays carry what_is_confirmed + what_is_missing per FM-8

Known issues

data:gaps-present

Verification

last_verified_at2026-05-22T00:00:00Z
verifier_specialist09-verification-pass
verifier_version1.0
verification_resultpassed
atomic_claims_checked64
atomic_claims_passed58
atomic_claims_partial6
atomic_claims_failed0
partial_claimsArticle 30-4 use-table by-right ADU verification (SL 2023-108 applicability) — Table 30-4.A.2 cell-level retrieval pending; Article 30-5.A parking ratios per use category (Table 30-5.A.4.b) — retrieval pending; districts marked 'p§30-5.A' for parking; FLOOD overlay exact freeboard above BFE — body in Article 30-5 floodplain section, retrieval pending; MHO §30-3.H.4 substantive body — placeholder text in retrieved Article 30-3 PDF export; SHO §30-3.H.7 and MCO §30-3.H.8 substantive bodies — placeholder text in retrieved Article 30-3 PDF export; CTO §30-3.H.11, RACO §30-3.H.12, SACO §30-3.H.13 substantive bodies — TOC entries verified; full body cells pending retrieval
narrative_refnarratives/fayetteville-nc/777b4fed-4a6a-4e50-b40e-d68e9a8a8738.json

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.

CaryCharlotteDurhamGreensboroHavelockJacksonvilleMorehead CityRaleigh