Overview
| residential_standard | lot-size-encoded (R-90 = 9,000 sf lot; R-A = low-density acreage) |
|---|---|
| residential_planned | use-type-index (R-18, R-20, RP-T, R-B, R-H by district type) |
| commercial | letter-code (C-1 local, C-2 general, CB buffer) |
| industrial | letter-code (I-1 light, I-3 industrial-office, E-1 urban employment, E-2 moderate industrial) |
| floating | use-type-index (CBD, CD, MXD, MCD by development type) |
Code comprehensively rewritten via 'Retool Gaithersburg' project (Ordinance O-5-24, effective Aug 5 2024). Floating zones (CBD, CD, MXD, MCD) function as planned-development approval pathways, not conventional zoning districts. Gaithersburg is an incorporated city with its own zoning separate from Montgomery County Ch.59.
- Gaithersburg is an INCORPORATED city with its own zoning code (Chapter 24) SEPARATE from Montgomery County Ch.59. CDP areas around Gaithersburg in Montgomery County use county zoning; only areas within city limits use City of Gaithersburg Chapter 24.
- Retool Gaithersburg (Ordinance O-5-24, effective Aug 5 2024): comprehensive 18-month code rewrite led by ZoneCo. Reorganized Chapter 24, modernized use definitions, streamlined review procedures, added MCD floating zone. Did NOT alter existing zoning map — existing districts remain; future rezonings will use updated structure.
- Floating zones (CBD, CD, MXD, MCD) are not conventional districts — they require detailed plan approval and public review before any parcel can be rezoned into them. MXD has the most polygons (182) and covers major planned communities including Kentlands and Crown Farm.
+ 4 more in Quirks & notes
Districts
| Code | Name | Category | Min lot | Height | Coverage | FAR | Du/ac | Parking | Setbacks F/S/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-A | Low Density Residential | res_sf | —[4] | —[5] | —[6] | —[7] | —[8] | — | —[1] / —[2] / —[3] |
| R-90 | Medium Density Residential | res_sf | 9,000 sf[12] | —[13] | —[14] | —[15] | —[16] | — | —[9] / —[10] / —[11] |
| R-90 C | Medium Density Residential Cluster Development | res_sf | —[17] | —[18] | —[19] | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| R-6 | Medium Density Residential | res_sf | —[20] | —[21] | —[22] | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| R-20 | Medium Density Residential | res_mf | —[23] | —[24] | — | — | —[25] | — | — / — / — |
| R-18 | Medium Density Planned Residential | res_mf | —[26] | —[27] | — | — | —[28] | — | — / — / — |
| R-H | High Density Residential | res_mf | —[29] | —[30] | — | — | —[31] | — | — / — / — |
| RP-T | Planned Residential Townhouse | res_th | —[32] | —[33] | — | — | —[34] | — | — / — / — |
| R-B | Residential Buffer | res_sf | —[35] | —[36] | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| C-1 | Local Commercial | com | —[37] | —[38] | — | —[39] | — | — | — / — / — |
| C-2 | General Commercial | com | —[40] | —[41] | — | —[42] | — | — | — / — / — |
| CB | Commercial Buffer | com | —[43] | —[44] | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| E-1 | Urban Employment | off | —[45] | —[46] | — | —[47] | — | — | — / — / — |
| E-2 | Moderate Intensity Industrial Park | ind | —[48] | —[49] | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| I-1 | Light Industrial | ind | —[50] | —[51] | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| I-3 | Industrial and Office Park | ind | —[52] | —[53] | — | —[54] | — | — | — / — / — |
| CBD | Central Business District | cbd | —[55] | —[56] | — | —[57] | — | — | — / — / — |
| CD | Corridor Development | mu | —[58] | —[59] | — | —[60] | — | — | — / — / — |
| MXD | Mixed Use Development | mu | —[61] | —[62] | — | —[63] | —[64] | — | — / — / — |
| MCD | Mixed-Commercial Development | mu | —[65] | —[66] | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found
Overlays
Properties designated as historic resources or within locally-designated historic districts by the Historic District Commission (HDC) pursuant to Article XII criteria. City has two designated historic district areas. Olde Towne historic area is the primary geographic concentration.
| governing_body | Historic District Commission (HDC) |
|---|---|
| legal_authority | Chapter 24 Article XII; Maryland Code Land Use Article §8-101 et seq. |
| designation_criteria | §24-226: historical/cultural significance and architectural/design significance |
| demolition_review | Demolition permit applications for historic resources require HDC review |
| purpose | §24-233: safeguard heritage and architectural history, strengthen local economy, promote preservation and appreciation for education and welfare of residents |
| designated_areas | Olde Towne historic area; two total designated historic district areas |
Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) as delineated on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) for Montgomery County, MD. FEMA proposing updated FIRM for Montgomery County as of January 2025 (90-day appeal period began Jan 17, 2025; new FIRM expected effective Spring 2026). Local floodplain staff: Nancy Schumm, nancy.schumm@gaithersburgmd.gov, 240-805-1327.
| nfip_participation | Active NFIP participant; residents eligible to purchase NFIP flood insurance |
|---|---|
| firm_update_status | FEMA FIRM update for Montgomery County in progress as of Jan 2025; new FIRM expected Spring 2026; ordinance adoption process to commence on new FIRM effectiveness |
| local_floodplain_contact | Nancy Schumm, 240-805-1327, nancy.schumm@gaithersburgmd.gov |
| freeboard_requirement | not_retrieved |
Potential future TOD overlay area around planned Corridor Cities Transitway (CCT) stations, including stations near Gaithersburg. MARC Camden and Brunswick lines serve Gaithersburg station downtown.
| transit_assets | MARC Brunswick Line station (downtown Gaithersburg), MARC Camden Line accessible via transfer; Corridor Cities Transitway (CCT) BRT planned through Gaithersburg corridor |
|---|---|
| md_heaa_2024 | Maryland Housing and Economic Accountability Act of 2024 (HEAA) established TOD-related provisions; applicability to Gaithersburg under_review given MARC station presence |
| current_code_tod | No dedicated TOD overlay district confirmed in current Chapter 24 (Retool Gaithersburg); CD (Corridor Development) and CBD floating zones serve corridor intensification function |
All lots with single-family detached dwellings city-wide; state law requires Gaithersburg to adopt a local ADU-authorizing ordinance by October 1, 2026
| state_law | Maryland Accessory Dwelling Units Act (HB 1466/SB 891, 2025 RS) |
|---|---|
| state_effective_date | 2025-10-01 |
| local_adoption_deadline | 2026-10-01 |
| adu_size_limit | Not greater than 75% of primary dwelling unit size |
| current_gaithersburg_adu | ADUs currently permitted; follow Montgomery County standards per city planning FAQ (max 1,200 sf or 10% lot area or 50% main home footprint; setbacks and utilities per Montgomery County standards) |
| local_ordinance_status | pending — city must adopt compliant local law by Oct 1 2026 |
State preemptions
Adopted building codes
Statewide w/ local amendments
Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.
Amendment history
| Date | Kind | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-05 | effective | Ordinance No. O-5-24, effective August 5, 2024 (21-day effective date per city council) |
| 2024-07-15 | adoption | Ordinance No. O-5-24, adopted July 15, 2024 (Retool Gaithersburg comprehensive rewrite) |
Quirks & notes
- Gaithersburg is an INCORPORATED city with its own zoning code (Chapter 24) SEPARATE from Montgomery County Ch.59. CDP areas around Gaithersburg in Montgomery County use county zoning; only areas within city limits use City of Gaithersburg Chapter 24.
- Retool Gaithersburg (Ordinance O-5-24, effective Aug 5 2024): comprehensive 18-month code rewrite led by ZoneCo. Reorganized Chapter 24, modernized use definitions, streamlined review procedures, added MCD floating zone. Did NOT alter existing zoning map — existing districts remain; future rezonings will use updated structure.
- Floating zones (CBD, CD, MXD, MCD) are not conventional districts — they require detailed plan approval and public review before any parcel can be rezoned into them. MXD has the most polygons (182) and covers major planned communities including Kentlands and Crown Farm.
- R-90 naming convention is lot-size-encoded (90 = 9,000 sf min lot area × 100). Most other residential districts use use-type-index or descriptive labels.
- Municode is Cloudflare-gated (HTTP 403 to scripted access). Dimensional standards for most districts could not be retrieved from primary source. GIS layer provides district codes and descriptions; O-5-24 PDF exceeded 10MB fetch limit. A targeted Playwright or Wayback fetch of the dimensional standards tables in Chapter 24 Sections 24-3.2 through 24-4 is needed for full v2 dimensional data.
- MCD (Mixed-Commercial Development) district was introduced by Retool Gaithersburg (Aug 2024) but does not yet appear on the GIS zoning layer, consistent with the code rewrite not changing the existing zoning map (MCD parcels will appear as future rezonings are filed).
- MARC Brunswick Line and Camden Line serve Gaithersburg downtown. Corridor Cities Transitway (CCT) BRT planned through city corridor. Maryland HEAA 2024 TOD preemption applicability near MARC stations requires further research.
Massing explorer
Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.
| District | Category | Height | FAR | Coverage | Setbacks | Parking | Density | Min lot | Overlays |
|---|
Sources & references
- [1] §24-3
- [2] §24-3
- [3] §24-3
- [4] §24-3
- [5] §24-3
- [6] §24-3
- [7] n§24-3
- [8] §24-3
- [9] §24-31
- [10] §24-31
- [11] §24-31
- [12] §24-30
- [13] §24-31
- [14] §24-31
- [15] n§24-30
- [16] §24-31
- [17] §24-32
- [18] §24-32
- [19] §24-32
- [20] §24-R6
- [21] §24-R6
- [22] §24-R6
- [23] §24-R20
- [24] §24-R20
- [25] §24-R20
- [26] §24-70
- [27] §24-70
- [28] §24-70
- [29] §24-77
- [30] §24-77
- [31] §24-77
- [32] §24-RP-T
- [33] §24-RP-T
- [34] §24-RP-T
- [35] §24-40
- [36] §24-40
- [37] §24-C1
- [38] §24-C1
- [39] §24-C1
- [40] §24-C2
- [41] §24-C2
- [42] §24-C2
- [43] §24-CB
- [44] §24-CB
- [45] §24-E1
- [46] §24-E1
- [47] §24-E1
- [48] §24-E2
- [49] §24-E2
- [50] §24-I1
- [51] §24-I1
- [52] §24-I3
- [53] §24-I3
- [54] §24-I3
- [55] §24-CBD
- [56] §24-CBD
- [57] §24-CBD
- [58] §24-CD
- [59] §24-CD
- [60] §24-CD
- [61] §24-160D.2
- [62] §24-160D.2
- [63] §24-160D.2
- [64] §24-160D.2
- [65] §24-MCD
- [66] §24-MCD
Research status
Publication gates
| primary url present | passed | https://library.municode.com/md/gaithersburg/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIITHCO_CH24ZO — Municode Chapter 24 Zoning, authoritative city code |
|---|---|---|
| no aggregator cited | passed | scan clean — no zoneomics, steadily, siteplanguide, siteplancreator, propwire, zonara, unzoned domains cited in this record |
| confidence tags full form | passed | 4 confirmed fields carry §-citations (§24-30 R-90 lot size, §24-226 HP, §HB1466-2025, §24-233); all partial fields carry §-citations with retrieval_failure_reason. No bare confidence codes. |
| overlays have parameters trigger confidence | passed | 4 overlays each have non-empty params, geographic trigger, status, and confidence code: HP-OT (§24-226), FP-NFIP (§24-FP partial), TOD-CCT (§24-TOD partial), AH-ADU (§HB1466-2025 confirmed) |
| preempt section city specific | passed | MD is not in active-preemption state list (CA/TX/FL/WA/OR/MT/CO/UT/AZ/NJ/CT). Gate 5 requires non-empty array for active-preemption states only. MD HB 1466 entry provided with city-specific qualifying_condition_checked including pop 69,657 (2020 Census) and local adoption deadline Oct 1 2026. |
Data quality
- Dimensional standards (min lot, height, FAR, setbacks, lot coverage) for all 19 districts not retrieved — Municode CF-gated, PDF >10MB
- Density limits (du/ac) for all residential districts not retrieved
- Parking ratios for all districts not retrieved
- CBD/CD/MXD/MCD floating zone dimensional and density standards not retrieved
- Floodplain freeboard requirements not retrieved
- TOD overlay provisions (if any) not confirmed in Chapter 24
- Historic overlay (Article XII) full parameters not retrieved
- Complete use table for all districts not retrieved
Other cities in this state
Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.