Overview
Code type
hybrid-pd
Naming convention
mixed
Euclidean base zoning is blended with 10 distinct Planned Communities (PCs) that cover a significant portion of the city. Base residential districts are R1, RS, R2, R4, and RP.
Districts
mu 5com 4res_sf 3res_mf 2ag 1spec 1ind 1off 1
| Code | Name | Category | Min lot | Height | Coverage | FAR | Du/ac | Parking | Setbacks F/S/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS | Residential Suburban | res_sf | 7,000 sf[4] | 35 ft[5] | 0.6[6] | — | — | — | 10[1] / 10[2] / 0[3] |
| R1 | Single-Family Residential | res_sf | 7,200 sf[10] | 35 ft[11] | — | — | — | — | 20[7] / 5[8] / 25[9] |
| R2 | Medium Density Residential | res_mf | 7,200 sf[15] | 35 ft[16] | — | — | — | — | 20[12] / 5[13] / 25[14] |
| R4 | High Density Residential | res_mf | 7,200 sf[20] | 35 ft[21] | — | — | — | — | 20[17] / 5[18] / 25[19] |
| RP | Residential Park | res_sf | 7,200 sf[25] | 35 ft[26] | — | — | — | — | 20[22] / 5[23] / 25[24] |
| MU 32 | Mixed-Use 32 | mu | — | 65 ft[30] | — | 1[31] | 32[32] | — | 10[27] / 10[28] / 10[29] |
| MU 43 | Mixed-Use 43 | mu | — | 65 ft[36] | — | 1.2[37] | 43[38] | — | 10[33] / 10[34] / 10[35] |
| MUO | Mixed-Use Overlay | mu | — | 65 ft[42] | — | 1.5[43] | — | — | 10[39] / 10[40] / 10[41] |
| UI 25 | Urban Infill 25 | mu | — | 65 ft[47] | — | 1[48] | 25[49] | — | 10[44] / 10[45] / 10[46] |
| UI 43 | Urban Infill 43 | mu | — | 65 ft[53] | — | 1.2[54] | 43[55] | — | 10[50] / 10[51] / 10[52] |
| A1 | Agricultural | ag | 174,240 sf[59] | 35 ft[60] | — | — | — | — | 20[56] / 5[57] / 25[58] |
| OS | Open Space | spec | 43,560 sf[61] | 18 ft[62] | 0.1[63] | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| C1 | Light Commercial | com | — | 35 ft[67] | — | — | — | — | 0[64] / 0[65] / 0[66] |
| C2 | General Commercial | com | — | 35 ft[71] | — | — | — | — | 0[68] / 0[69] / 0[70] |
| CC | Canyon Commercial | com | — | 65 ft[75] | — | — | — | — | 5[72] / 5[73] / 5[74] |
| CN | Neighborhood Commercial | com | — | 35 ft[79] | 0.35[80] | — | — | — | 20[76] / 20[77] / 20[78] |
| M1 | Light Industrial | ind | 10,000 sf[84] | 35 ft[85] | — | — | — | — | 20[81] / 20[82] / 20[83] |
| PA | Professional and Administrative Office | off | 10,000 sf[89] | 35 ft[90] | 0.35[91] | — | — | — | 10[86] / 10[87] / 10[88] |
Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found
State preemptions
ca-density-bonus-lawapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide application. Applies to any housing project in Lake Forest that meets the required affordability percentage thresholds under Government Code §65915.
ca-sb9-home-actapplies
Qualifying condition
Lake Forest is a CA general-law city with base single-family R1 and RS residential districts. Implements SB 9 duplexes and housing opportunity developments in Municipal Code Chapter 9.52.
ca-ab2097-parking-transitapplies
Qualifying condition
Applies conditionally on a per-parcel basis to commercial, residential, or mixed-use development parcels situated within one-half mile of a qualifying major transit stop.
ca-sb423-streamlinedapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide streamlining. Lake Forest has an adopted 6th Cycle Housing Element certified compliant as of 2023-02-24, and is in HCD's 50% streamlined ministerial approval tier.
ca-ab2011-affordable-housing-high-roadapplies
Qualifying condition
Applies to qualifying commercial zones situated along transport/transit corridors. Lake Forest commercial districts include CN, C1, C2, and mixed-use districts.
ca-adu-jaduapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide application. Applies to all residential and mixed-use zoning districts in Lake Forest.
ca-sb79-transit-orientedapplies
Qualifying condition
Applies conditionally on a per-parcel basis near transit hubs and rail stations, subject to proximity limits and criteria.
ca-sb4-yigby-faith-iheapplies
Qualifying condition
Applies statewide to qualifying institutions on housing development assets, allowing religious and higher education institution land overrides.
ca-sb684-sb1123-small-lot-subdivisionapplies
Qualifying condition
Applies statewide. Restructures lot split / subdivision procedures for projects of 10 units or less in multifamily, mixed-use, and vacant single-family sites.
ca-ab130-ceqa-statutory-infill-exemptionapplies
Qualifying condition
Applies to urban infill projects under 20 acres that meet zoning and objective standards.
ca-sb131-ceqa-near-missapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide CEQA streamlining. Limits environmental review to single failing conditions on near-miss exemptions.
ca-ab1287-density-bonus-stackingapplies
Qualifying condition
Applies to projects that qualify for and maximize base State Density Bonus Law provisions.
ca-ab2243-ab2011-mall-acreageapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide Commercial Corridor expansion. Expands regional mall exemptions under AB 2011 up to 100 acres.
ca-ab893-ab2011-campus-extensionapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Extends the commercial corridor provisions of AB 2011 to campus and nonprofit institutional developer programs.
ca-ab1061-sb9-cleanupapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Re-enables SB 9 on sites containing non-contributing historic structures.
ca-ab1633-ceqa-haa-linkapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Links CEQA review timing to HAA's failure to act / disapproval definitions.
Non-applicable laws (3)
ca-builders-remedydoes_not_apply
Qualifying condition
Lake Forest has a certified compliant 6th Cycle Housing Element (certified 2023-02-24, compliance status 'In'). Builder's Remedy is not applicable.
ca-sb10-local-upzoningdoes_not_apply
Qualifying condition
Optional local upzoning authority. Lake Forest has not adopted a local upzoning ordinance under SB 10.
ca-ab1893-builders-remedy-cleanupdoes_not_apply
Qualifying condition
Clean-up legislation for Builder's Remedy; not active as Lake Forest has a compliant Housing Element.
Adopted building codes
Statewide mandatory minimum
Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.
Amendment history
| Date | Kind | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-31 | retrieved at | |
| 2025-02-04 | supplement effective | Ordinance No. 374 |
Formulas
Definitions
- height
- Vertical distance above finished grade to top of the structure, or slope-adjusted per §9.144.050.1.
- setback
- Distance from ultimate street right-of-way line or property line to nearest building face per §9.144.030.1.
- lot_coverage
- Maximum percentage of building site area covered by principal and accessory buildings (§9.48.080.C for RS).
- density
- Net land area per dwelling unit (§9.144.020 / §9.56.080.C for R2, §9.64.080.C for R4).
- far
- Floor area ratio (§9.73.020 for Mixed Use).
Massing explorer
Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.
Sort by
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
| District | Category | Height | FAR | Coverage | Setbacks | Parking | Density | Min lot | Overlays |
|---|
Sources & references
Citations
- [1] §9.144.030
- [2] §9.144.030
- [3] §9.144.030
- [4] §9.48.080
- [5] §9.48.080
- [6] §9.48.080
- [7] §9.144.030
- [8] §9.144.030
- [9] §9.144.030
- [10] §9.44.080
- [11] §9.44.080
- [12] §9.144.030
- [13] §9.144.030
- [14] §9.144.030
- [15] §9.56.080
- [16] §9.56.080
- [17] §9.144.030
- [18] §9.144.030
- [19] §9.144.030
- [20] §9.64.080
- [21] §9.64.080
- [22] §9.144.030
- [23] §9.144.030
- [24] §9.144.030
- [25] §9.68.080
- [26] §9.68.080
- [27] §9.73.061
- [28] §9.73.061
- [29] §9.73.061
- [30] §9.73.020
- [31] §9.73.020
- [32] §9.73.020
- [33] §9.73.061
- [34] §9.73.061
- [35] §9.73.061
- [36] §9.73.030
- [37] §9.73.030
- [38] §9.73.030
- [39] §9.73.061
- [40] §9.73.061
- [41] §9.73.061
- [42] §9.73.040
- [43] §9.73.040
- [44] §9.73.061
- [45] §9.73.061
- [46] §9.73.061
- [47] §9.73.050
- [48] §9.73.050
- [49] §9.73.050
- [50] §9.73.061
- [51] §9.73.061
- [52] §9.73.061
- [53] §9.73.060
- [54] §9.73.060
- [55] §9.73.060
- [56] §9.72.010
- [57] §9.72.010
- [58] §9.72.010
- [59] §9.72.010
- [60] §9.72.010
- [61] §9.72.020
- [62] §9.72.020
- [63] §9.72.020
- [64] §9.72.025
- [65] §9.72.025
- [66] §9.72.025
- [67] §9.72.025
- [68] §9.72.030
- [69] §9.72.030
- [70] §9.72.030
- [71] §9.72.030
- [72] §9.72.040
- [73] §9.72.040
- [74] §9.72.040
- [75] §9.72.040
- [76] §9.72.050
- [77] §9.72.050
- [78] §9.72.050
- [79] §9.72.050
- [80] §9.72.050
- [81] §9.72.070
- [82] §9.72.070
- [83] §9.72.070
- [84] §9.72.070
- [85] §9.72.070
- [86] §9.72.080
- [87] §9.72.080
- [88] §9.72.080
- [89] §9.72.080
- [90] §9.72.080
- [91] §9.72.080
Research status
Publication gates
| primary url present | passed | |
|---|---|---|
| no aggregator cited | passed | |
| confidence tags full form | passed | |
| overlays have parameters trigger confidence | passed | |
| preempt section city specific | passed | |
| research profile consistent | passed |
Other cities in this state
Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.