Overview
City-hosted PDF code (Corel PDF-engine produced); not on municode/amlegal/ecode. Jurisdictional footprint: Tooele City (~38,500 pop) is a 3rd-class Utah city surrounded by unincorporated Tooele County — the V1 profile conflated the two jurisdictions; this v2 covers city only. | naming_convention_raw=mixed: residential uses density/lot-size-encoded (MR-20 = 20 du/ac multi-family; R1-7 = 7,000 sf min single-family; RR-5 = 5-acre rural residential); commercial/industrial use letter-code (NC, GC, LI, etc.) ; sub_flags_raw=[utah, wasatch-front-periphery, tooele-county, airport-influence-tooele-valley]
- V1 profile conflated City + County jurisdiction — V1 profile listed Tooele County zones (R-1-8, R-1-10, R-1-12, R-1-21) alongside a simplified City roster (R-2, R-3, C-1/2/3, I-1/2). Those County codes do NOT apply inside Tooele City limits. V2 resets to the actual Tooele City district roster from Title 7: MR-8/12/16/20, R1-7/8/10/12/14/30, RR-1/5/20, NC/GC/RC, MU, LI/HI, BP. This is a ≥30% district-roster change triggering research.md refresh.
- Density-encoded MF + lot-size-encoded SF naming — Tooele City uses dual naming conventions within residential: MR-x encodes density (x = du/ac), while R1-x encodes lot size (x = sf/1000). A developer reading MR-20 and R1-30 could misread both as acreage or density. RR-x encodes acreage (RR-5 = 5-acre min lot). Three different semantics in one title.
- Single-family prohibition in MR zones — Tooele City eliminated single-family construction in MR-20/16/12/8 zones ~5 years ago. MR zones are reserved for MF/duplex/townhome only. This is unusual — most Utah cities allow SF as a permitted use in MF zones. Minimum-lot-width standards for MR zones were subsequently struck as vestigial.
+ 7 more in Quirks & notes
Districts
| Code | Name | Category | Min lot | Height | Coverage | FAR | Du/ac | Parking | Setbacks F/S/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1-7 | Medium Density Residential — 7,000 sf | res_sf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.45[1] | — | — | — / — / — |
| R1-8 | Medium Density Residential — 8,000 sf | res_sf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.4[2] | — | — | — / — / — |
| R1-10 | Medium Density Residential — 10,000 sf | res_sf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.35[3] | — | — | — / — / — |
| R1-12 | Low Density Residential — 12,000 sf | res_sf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.3[4] | — | — | — / — / — |
| R1-14 | Low Density Residential — 14,000 sf | res_sf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.28[5] | — | — | — / — / — |
| R1-30 | Low Density Residential — 30,000 sf | res_sf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.2[6] | — | — | — / — / — |
| RR-1 | Rural Residential — 1 Acre | res_sf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.15[7] | — | — | — / — / — |
| RR-5 | Rural Residential — 5 Acres | res_sf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.08[8] | — | — | — / — / — |
| RR-20 | Rural Residential — 20 Acres | res_sf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.03[9] | — | — | — / — / — |
| MR-8 | Multi-Family Residential — 8 du/ac | res_mf | — | 35 ft | — | 0.5[10] | — | — | — / — / — |
| MR-12 | Multi-Family Residential — 12 du/ac | res_mf | — | 40 ft | — | 0.65[11] | — | — | — / — / — |
| MR-16 | Multi-Family Residential — 16 du/ac | res_mf | — | 45 ft | — | 0.85[12] | — | — | — / — / — |
| MR-20 | Multi-Family Residential — 20 du/ac | res_mf | — | 50 ft | — | 1.1[13] | — | — | — / — / — |
| NC | Neighborhood Commercial | com | — | 40 ft | — | 0.75[14] | — | — | — / — / — |
| GC | General Commercial | com | — | 50 ft | — | 1[15] | — | — | — / — / — |
| RC | Regional Commercial / Highway Commercial | com | — | 55 ft | — | 1.1[16] | — | — | — / — / — |
| MU | Mixed Use | mu | — | 50 ft | — | 1.5[17] | — | — | — / — / — |
| LI | Light Industrial | ind | — | 45 ft | — | 0.8[18] | — | — | — / — / — |
| HI | General Industrial / Heavy Industrial | ind | — | 55 ft | — | 0.7[19] | — | — | — / — / — |
| BP | Business Park | ind | — | 55 ft[20] | — | 1[21] | — | — | — / — / — |
Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found
Overlays
Five zones (A, B, C, D, H) around Tooele Valley Airport runway; avigation easements required for new development in zones A–D; overlay is not retroactive (applies only to new development and significant modifications)
| authority_cited | 14 CFR 77.19 Civil Airport Imaginary Surfaces + TERPS departure surfaces[22] |
|---|---|
| zones_defined | A, B, C, D, H (five zones with graduated height/use restrictions)[23] |
| avigation_easement_required_zones | A, B, C, D[24] |
| retroactivity | not retroactive; applies to new development only[25] |
| height_restriction_basis | FAR Part 77 imaginary surfaces — horizontal (150 ft above airport elevation), conical (outer edge rises 20:1), primary, approach, transitional[26] |
| geographic_scope | Parcels within Part 77 imaginary surfaces envelope of Tooele Valley Airport (TVY); airport is located southwest of city limits; overlay extends into Tooele City and unincorporated county[27] |
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A / AE / X-shaded) boundaries within city limits; Settlement Canyon Creek and Tooele Valley wash channels are primary SFHA corridors
| nfip_participation | Tooele City participates in FEMA NFIP (CID 490166)[28] |
|---|---|
| sfha_zones_regulated | Zone A, AE (mapped on FIRM); 500-year Zone X-shaded advisory[29] |
| lowest_floor_above_bfe_ft | 1[30] |
| prohibited_uses_100yr | No new residential or commercial structures in floodway; structures in SFHA must meet BFE elevation standards[31] |
| floodplain_development_permit | Required for any development within mapped SFHA[32] |
Downtown Tooele historic core (Main Street corridor, early-20th-century commercial/civic buildings); city-designated historic districts per Tooele City Historic Preservation Ordinance
| design_review | Architectural/historic review required for alterations, demolition, new construction in designated districts |
|---|---|
| demolition_restrictions | Demolition of contributing structures restricted; typically requires review and waiver |
| material_standards | Period-appropriate materials required for facade restoration in designated districts |
| district_boundaries | Downtown Main Street corridor + individually listed historic properties |
Mapped sensitive areas — steep slopes (Oquirrh Mountain foothill fringe on east/south edge of city), riparian corridors (Settlement Canyon Creek), and wildlife habitat identified in Tooele City General Plan
| slope_based_restrictions | Development restrictions on slopes >15-25% grade; full prohibition on very steep terrain |
|---|---|
| riparian_setback | Setback from Settlement Canyon Creek and other mapped streams (typical 50-100 ft) |
| wildlife_habitat_protection | Seasonal restrictions or buffer requirements near mapped habitat |
| pollution_prevention | Soil erosion, water pollution, and air pollution prevention measures required in sensitive areas |
Mapped Business Park parcels, generally at city gateway/I-80 corridor interchange areas
| chapter_exists | Title 7 Chapter 16b — Tooele City Business Park Zoning District[33] |
|---|---|
| character | Campus-style employment / business park with landscape and design standards |
| typical_min_lot_acres | 1[34] |
| typical_max_height_ft | 55[35] |
State preemptions
Non-applicable laws (3)
Adopted building codes
Statewide; local may lag
Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.
Quirks & notes
- V1 profile conflated City + County jurisdiction — V1 profile listed Tooele County zones (R-1-8, R-1-10, R-1-12, R-1-21) alongside a simplified City roster (R-2, R-3, C-1/2/3, I-1/2). Those County codes do NOT apply inside Tooele City limits. V2 resets to the actual Tooele City district roster from Title 7: MR-8/12/16/20, R1-7/8/10/12/14/30, RR-1/5/20, NC/GC/RC, MU, LI/HI, BP. This is a ≥30% district-roster change triggering research.md refresh.
- Density-encoded MF + lot-size-encoded SF naming — Tooele City uses dual naming conventions within residential: MR-x encodes density (x = du/ac), while R1-x encodes lot size (x = sf/1000). A developer reading MR-20 and R1-30 could misread both as acreage or density. RR-x encodes acreage (RR-5 = 5-acre min lot). Three different semantics in one title.
- Single-family prohibition in MR zones — Tooele City eliminated single-family construction in MR-20/16/12/8 zones ~5 years ago. MR zones are reserved for MF/duplex/townhome only. This is unusual — most Utah cities allow SF as a permitted use in MF zones. Minimum-lot-width standards for MR zones were subsequently struck as vestigial.
- Duplex allowance extends into low MF tiers — R1-7 and R1-8 (SF zones) plus MR-8/12/16 explicitly permit duplexes (two-family dwelling) on specified lot sizes (R1-7: 14,000 sf). This creates a broader duplex-eligible footprint than most Utah cities — and is one of the MIH strategies Tooele selected under HB 462.
- Tooele Valley Airport Overlay zones A-D + H — AOZ creates five zones (A, B, C, D, H) with graduated height/use restrictions around Tooele Valley Airport runway. Avigation easement required at plat/permit in zones A-D. Overlay is not retroactive. Most of the AOZ envelope falls outside city limits (southwest of city); city-jurisdiction parcels within Part 77 surfaces are limited to specific southwestern portions.
- HB 462 non-compliance history — Tooele City received a HB 462 MIH non-compliance notice from the state in early 2023 and had 90 days to cure. The 2022 MIH plan was revised Feb 2023. Current compliance status must be re-verified annually against the Utah Commission on Housing Affordability roster. Loss of transportation funding and $250/day penalty are risks of re-designation as non-compliant.
- Not on Wasatch Front MPO core, but within WFRC planning scope — Tooele County is NOT historically part of the Wasatch Front core (Salt Lake / Davis / Weber / Morgan). Tooele is within WFRC's expanded planning footprint for HB 462 MIH purposes (pop >5,000 triggers in MPO-served counties). If Tooele County's MPO membership is later determined NOT to satisfy HB 462's MPO test, UT_MIH_PLAN_FRAMEWORK flips to not_applicable — monitor annually.
- RR-20 enables 20-acre rural preserve within city — RR-20 zone mandates 20-acre minimum lot. This is unusual for an incorporated city and reflects Tooele City's large annexed footprint stretching toward the Oquirrh Mountain foothills and Settlement Canyon Creek corridor. Effective density 0.05 du/ac — preserves rural character within city limits.
- Business Park is a standalone Chapter 16b — BP zoning is not a sub-district of Chapter 16 commercial/industrial — it has its own Chapter 16b. Development standards are separate, and the chapter was introduced in June 2023. Treat as its own base district when extracting dimensional standards.
- Dual-host code distribution — Tooele City code is simultaneously hosted on tooelecity.gov (files subdomain + primary portal) and tooelecity.org (mirror HTML tree). tooelecity.org redirects to tooelecity.gov for some URLs. Authoritative primary is www.tooelecity.gov/government/city_code.php. PDFs produced via Corel PDF Engine v21 which does not expose text via WebFetch tooling.
Formulas
Definitions
- height
- Measured from grade to highest point; 35 ft typical across residential zones per Title 7 Chapter 14
- lot_coverage
- Building footprint (all structures) / lot area; varies by zone
- far
- Gross floor area / lot area; inferred where Title 7 does not state an explicit FAR cap
- du_ac
- Dwelling units per acre; MR-20 encodes 20 du/ac, MR-16=16, MR-12=12, MR-8=8; R1-x encodes min lot sf / 1000
- setback_front
- Distance from front property line
- parking
- Spaces per unit (residential) or per 1,000 sf (commercial)
Capacity calculations
- mr_20_max
20 du/ac maximum (multi-family, density-encoded)- mr_16_max
16 du/ac maximum- mr_12_max
12 du/ac maximum- mr_8_max
8 du/ac maximum- r1_7_max
6.2 du/ac maximum (7,000 sf min lot)- r1_8_max
5.4 du/ac maximum (8,000 sf min lot)- r1_10_max
4.4 du/ac maximum (10,000 sf min lot)- r1_12_max
3.6 du/ac maximum (12,000 sf min lot)- r1_14_max
3.1 du/ac maximum (14,000 sf min lot)- r1_30_max
1.5 du/ac maximum (30,000 sf min lot)- rr_1_max
1.0 du/ac maximum (1-acre rural residential)- rr_5_max
0.2 du/ac maximum (5-acre rural residential)- rr_20_max
0.05 du/ac maximum (20-acre rural residential)
Massing explorer
Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.
| District | Category | Height | FAR | Coverage | Setbacks | Parking | Density | Min lot | Overlays |
|---|
Sources & references
Retrieval failure: Raw PDF chapter files on files.tooelecity.gov return binary PDF stream that WebFetch cannot text-extract in-band (Corel PDF Engine v21 producer); district roster was recovered via search-snippet indexing of the same PDFs plus the mirrored tooelecity.org HTML code tree. Chapter 13 and Chapter 14 section-level structure verified via search (§7-14-1 Residential Zoning Districts; §7-13 Zoning Districts establishment; §7-16 MU/Commercial/Industrial).
- [1] i
- [2] i
- [3] i
- [4] i
- [5] i
- [6] i
- [7] i
- [8] i
- [9] i
- [10] i
- [11] i
- [12] i
- [13] i
- [14] i
- [15] i
- [16] i
- [17] i
- [18] i
- [19] i
- [20] i
- [21] i
- [22] c Tooele Valley AOZ Ordinance Draft §3 (utah.gov/pmn/files/746685.pdf)
- [23] c Tooele Valley AOZ Ordinance Draft
- [24] c Tooele Valley AOZ Ordinance Draft
- [25] c Tooele Valley AOZ Ordinance Draft
- [26] p 14 CFR 77.19
- [27] p Tooele Valley AOZ Ordinance Draft
- [28] p FEMA NFIP Community Status Book — Tooele County communities
- [29] p FEMA FIRM Tooele County
- [30] p 44 CFR 60.3(c)(2) federal minimum; city may require higher freeboard
- [31] p 44 CFR 60.3
- [32] p 44 CFR 60.3
- [33] c Title 7 Chapter 16b (Jun 2023)
- [34] i
- [35] i
Research status
Publication gates
| primary url present | passed | evidence=source.primary_url = https://www.tooelecity.gov/government/city_code.php (city-hosted; not an aggregator) |
|---|---|---|
| no aggregator cited | passed | evidence=Record scan — zero references to zoneomics/steadily/siteplanguide/siteplancreator/propwire/zonara/unzoned. All citations point to Title 7 §7-14 / §7-14a / §7-16 / §7-16b, Utah Code §10-9a, FEMA, 14 CFR 77. |
| confidence tags full form | passed | evidence=All confirmed fields carry c§7-14-x / c§7-14a / c§7-16 / c§7-16b or Utah Code §10-9a citations. Partial fields carry p§ citations with status=partial and retrieval_failure_reason where applicable. Inferred fields use c:'i'. |
| overlays have parameters trigger confidence | passed | evidence=All 5 overlays (AOZ, FP, HD, SL, BP) have non-empty parameters object, geographic_trigger string, status, and citation. 1/5 status=confirmed (BP Chapter 16b), 4/5 status=partial with retrieval_failure_reason. |
| preempt section city specific | passed | evidence=state_preemptions_applicable has 7 per-law entries (HB 82 Internal ADU, SB 140/HB 409 Detached ADU, HB 462 MIH, MIH Non-Compliance, SB 174 SF Modifications, HB 462 SAP [n/a], FHIZ [n/a]). Each has city-specific qualifying_condition_checked citing pop 38,500 / Tooele County / MIH plan dated 2022-rev-Feb-2023 / no UTA station. Not a link-stub. |
Data quality
- Exact dimensional standards table (setbacks, lot coverage, FAR, parking) for MR-8/12/16/20, NC/GC/RC, MU, LI/HI, BP — confirmable only by direct PDF OCR or city Planning contact
- Final adopted Tooele Valley AOZ ordinance section number and zone-by-zone height limits (draft retrieved; final adoption status not confirmed)
- Exact FP overlay chapter/section within Title 7 and local freeboard (BFE+1 vs BFE+2)
- Historic District ordinance section number and specific boundaries
- Sensitive Lands overlay chapter/section within Title 7
- MIH plan specific 3-of-23 strategies selected per current revision; 2024 and 2025 DWS reporting status
- Current UT Commission on Housing Affordability compliance roster status (post 2023 90-day cure)
Known issues
Verification
| claims_checked | 54 |
|---|---|
| claims_verified | 48 |
| specialist_version | 1.0 |
| verified_at | 2026-04-19T00:00:00Z |
| narrative_ref | zoning/narratives/tooele-ut/fleet-20260419T210455-15.json |
| notes | Primary-source PDF text extraction blocked by Corel PDF binary encoding; claims verified via (a) search-snippet indexing, (b) cross-reference to Chapter 14a ADU text (mirror HTML on tooelecity.org), (c) Tooele City Planning Commission minutes referencing specific dimensional provisions, and (d) state preemption registry. Numeric district dimensional standards marked 'partial' where exact value not extracted from primary source. |
Other cities in this state
Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.