Overview
The Woodlands is NOT an incorporated municipality. The November 2021 incorporation referendum was defeated. It is a Census Designated Place (CDP) in Montgomery County. Land use is governed by (a) recorded deed restrictions (Residential and Commercial Development Standards written by The Woodlands Development Company — originally George Mitchell's Mitchell Energy & Development Corp., now owned by Howard Hughes Holdings) enforced by Covenant Administration / the Woodlands Development Standards Committee (WDSC), (b) the Village-level residential association covenants, (c) the Woodlands Township (a special-purpose district created by Tex. HB 4109 in 2007 from the merger of the Woodlands Association, Woodlands Community Association, and Town Center Improvement District) for limited police/fire/parks/signage/noise powers — the Township does NOT have zoning authority, (d) Montgomery County subdivision platting authority under Tex. Loc. Gov. Code Ch. 232. The base_districts[] array is intentionally empty; the villages and development-standard types are captured in districts[] and overlays[].
- The Woodlands is NOT an incorporated municipality. The November 2021 incorporation referendum was DEFEATED (approximately 58% against). It remains an unincorporated Census Designated Place (CDP) in Montgomery County. Prior v1 research records erroneously listed a 2022 incorporation — that never happened. The v1 'City of The Woodlands Municipal Code' does not exist as a legal instrument. (Montgomery County Elections Office, Nov 2021 ballot results; Texas HB 4109 (2007) creating The Woodlands Township as a special-purpose district, not a municipality)
- Land use is governed by recorded deed restrictions (Residential Development Standards and Commercial Development Standards) administered by Covenant Administration / the Woodlands Development Standards Committee (WDSC). The Township itself has NO zoning authority — its HB 4109 enabling act does not delegate Tex. Loc. Gov. Code Ch. 211 powers. This is a strict deed-restriction regime, stronger than Houston's (because the RDS is a unitary developer-authored document applied community-wide, not a patchwork of civic-club-enforced subdivision restrictions). (Tex. HB 4109 (80th Leg., 2007); RDS/CDS on file with Covenant Administration; Tex. Prop. Code Ch. 202, Ch. 209)
- Eight villages, each with its own supplementary RDS section and village association: Grogan's Mill (1974), Panther Creek (1978), Cochran's Crossing (1985), Indian Springs (1988), Alden Bridge (1994), College Park (2000), Sterling Ridge (2000), Creekside Park (2007). Creekside Park is the only village in Harris County; the other seven are in Montgomery County. (The Woodlands Township village directory and recorded village plats)
+ 6 more in Quirks & notes
Districts
| Code | Name | Category | Min lot | Height | Coverage | FAR | Du/ac | Parking | Setbacks F/S/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V-GM | Grogan's Mill Village | res_sf | —[4] | 35 ft[5] | —[6] | — | — | 2[7] | —[1] / —[2] / —[3] |
| V-PC | Panther Creek Village | res_sf | —[11] | 35 ft[12] | —[13] | — | — | 2[14] | —[8] / —[9] / —[10] |
| V-CC | Cochran's Crossing Village | res_sf | —[18] | 35 ft[19] | —[20] | — | — | 2[21] | —[15] / —[16] / —[17] |
| V-IS | Indian Springs Village | res_sf | —[25] | 35 ft[26] | —[27] | — | — | 2[28] | —[22] / —[23] / —[24] |
| V-AB | Alden Bridge Village | res_sf | —[32] | 35 ft[33] | —[34] | — | — | 2[35] | —[29] / —[30] / —[31] |
| V-CP | College Park Village | res_sf | —[39] | 35 ft[40] | —[41] | — | — | 2[42] | —[36] / —[37] / —[38] |
| V-SR | Sterling Ridge Village | res_sf | —[46] | 35 ft[47] | —[48] | — | — | 2[49] | —[43] / —[44] / —[45] |
| V-CSP | Creekside Park Village | res_sf | —[53] | 35 ft[54] | —[55] | — | — | 2[56] | —[50] / —[51] / —[52] |
| TC | Town Center (Commercial/Mixed-Use Tract) | mu | —[60] | -1 ft[61] | —[62] | — | — | —[63] | —[57] / —[58] / —[59] |
| RF | Research Forest Corridor (Commercial Tract) | off | —[67] | 75 ft[68] | —[69] | — | — | 3.5[70] | —[64] / —[65] / —[66] |
Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found
Overlays
State preemptions
Non-applicable laws (2)
Adopted building codes
Home rule; major cities on 2024 IBC
Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.
Quirks & notes
- The Woodlands is NOT an incorporated municipality. The November 2021 incorporation referendum was DEFEATED (approximately 58% against). It remains an unincorporated Census Designated Place (CDP) in Montgomery County. Prior v1 research records erroneously listed a 2022 incorporation — that never happened. The v1 'City of The Woodlands Municipal Code' does not exist as a legal instrument. (Montgomery County Elections Office, Nov 2021 ballot results; Texas HB 4109 (2007) creating The Woodlands Township as a special-purpose district, not a municipality)
- Land use is governed by recorded deed restrictions (Residential Development Standards and Commercial Development Standards) administered by Covenant Administration / the Woodlands Development Standards Committee (WDSC). The Township itself has NO zoning authority — its HB 4109 enabling act does not delegate Tex. Loc. Gov. Code Ch. 211 powers. This is a strict deed-restriction regime, stronger than Houston's (because the RDS is a unitary developer-authored document applied community-wide, not a patchwork of civic-club-enforced subdivision restrictions). (Tex. HB 4109 (80th Leg., 2007); RDS/CDS on file with Covenant Administration; Tex. Prop. Code Ch. 202, Ch. 209)
- Eight villages, each with its own supplementary RDS section and village association: Grogan's Mill (1974), Panther Creek (1978), Cochran's Crossing (1985), Indian Springs (1988), Alden Bridge (1994), College Park (2000), Sterling Ridge (2000), Creekside Park (2007). Creekside Park is the only village in Harris County; the other seven are in Montgomery County. (The Woodlands Township village directory and recorded village plats)
- The Woodlands Development Company (originally Mitchell Energy & Development Corp., George Mitchell's firm) sold its interest to Howard Hughes Corporation in 2011 (now Howard Hughes Holdings). Howard Hughes retains declarant rights under the recorded covenants — meaning the developer's reserved approval authority did not expire with the original platting and continues to run alongside WDSC review for the newest tracts (Creekside Park, remaining Town Center parcels). (Mitchell Energy 2011 sale to Howard Hughes Corp; declarant-rights clauses in village declarations)
- Town Center is the only high-rise zone in The Woodlands — 30+ story towers (Anadarko/Occidental ~550 ft, Hughes Landing towers, Market Street-adjacent office) sit within a commercial tract governed by Town Center CDS, not a zoning district. Heights are set by CDS + FAA/airport-hazard, not by a zoning height table. (TC-CDS; Anadarko Tower at 1201 Lake Robbins Dr (~550 ft))
- ExxonMobil's Springwoods Village corporate campus immediately south of The Woodlands is a SEPARATE master-planned community (Springwoods Village, Harris County) and operates under its own development agreement. Prior v1 erroneously described an 'ExxonMobil Campus District' inside The Woodlands. The ExxonMobil Houston campus is geographically adjacent but not in The Woodlands. (Springwoods Village master plan (Coventry Development); boundary verification vs. The Woodlands Township boundary)
- SB 840 and SB 15 facial-zero applicability — same quirk as Houston. SB 840 preempts zoning districts that do not exist here; SB 15 reaches municipal plat authority not exercised here. The 2025 Texas housing-deregulation package does not reach this CDP's private-covenant regime. (Tex. Loc. Gov. Code §211.0165 (SB 840); §212.904 (SB 15); see quirks-catalog.md Houston entry for sibling pattern)
- Montgomery County subdivision regulations (Tex. Loc. Gov. Code Ch. 232) govern platting in the unincorporated area. Every new subdivision phase and every replat required Commissioners Court approval during the build-out of the villages. Post build-out, the regulatory center of gravity is WDSC covenant review, with County involvement limited to replats and vacation applications. (Tex. Loc. Gov. Code Ch. 232; Montgomery County Subdivision Regulations)
- The Woodlands Joint Powers Agency (WJPA) and multiple MUDs / WCIDs (Montgomery County MUD 6, 7, 36, 39, 40, 46, 47, 60, 67, 86, 89, 94, 95, 96, 99, 386 in Harris County) provide water/wastewater/drainage. Development approvals must coordinate with the relevant MUD as a separate entitlement step. These are infrastructure districts, not zoning authorities. (TCEQ MUD/WCID confirmation lists; WJPA interlocal agreements)
Formulas
Definitions
- height
- Grade to highest point of structure per Residential/Commercial Development Standards; typically 35 ft residential, varies commercial by village.
- lot_coverage
- Building footprint / lot area per village-specific RDS section.
- far
- Not regulated by deed restrictions citywide; controlled indirectly via lot coverage + height + setback.
- du_ac
- Not a deed-restriction concept; density was set at the master-plan subdivision stage and is fixed by the recorded plat for each village.
- setback_front
- Front property line to nearest building face per RDS/CDS village section.
- setback_side
- Side property line to nearest building face per RDS/CDS village section.
- setback_rear
- Rear property line to nearest building face per RDS/CDS village section.
- parking
- Per Montgomery County subdivision regulations + recorded site plan approvals; Township does not set parking ratios.
- wdsc_review
- Mandatory pre-construction review by Woodlands Development Standards Committee / Covenant Administration for any exterior work visible from public view, including color, materials, fencing, landscaping, and signage.
Capacity calculations
- max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage_from_rds- max_units
Fixed by recorded subdivision plat per village — not a variable- far_not_applicable
No citywide FAR; bulk is controlled via RDS lot-coverage + height + setback + WDSC aesthetic review.
Massing explorer
Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.
| District | Category | Height | FAR | Coverage | Setbacks | Parking | Density | Min lot | Overlays |
|---|
Sources & references
- [1] uRDS
- [2] uRDS
- [3] uRDS
- [4] uRDS
- [5] iRDS
- [6] uRDS
- [7] iRDS
- [8] uRDS
- [9] uRDS
- [10] uRDS
- [11] uRDS
- [12] iRDS
- [13] uRDS
- [14] iRDS
- [15] uRDS
- [16] uRDS
- [17] uRDS
- [18] uRDS
- [19] iRDS
- [20] uRDS
- [21] iRDS
- [22] uRDS
- [23] uRDS
- [24] uRDS
- [25] uRDS
- [26] iRDS
- [27] uRDS
- [28] iRDS
- [29] uRDS
- [30] uRDS
- [31] uRDS
- [32] uRDS
- [33] iRDS
- [34] uRDS
- [35] iRDS
- [36] uRDS
- [37] uRDS
- [38] uRDS
- [39] uRDS
- [40] iRDS
- [41] uRDS
- [42] iRDS
- [43] uRDS
- [44] uRDS
- [45] uRDS
- [46] uRDS
- [47] iRDS
- [48] uRDS
- [49] iRDS
- [50] uRDS
- [51] uRDS
- [52] uRDS
- [53] uRDS
- [54] iRDS
- [55] uRDS
- [56] iRDS
- [57] uCDS
- [58] uCDS
- [59] uCDS
- [60] uCDS
- [61] TC-CDS
- [62] uCDS
- [63] uCDS
- [64] uCDS
- [65] uCDS
- [66] uCDS
- [67] uCDS
- [68] iCDS
- [69] uCDS
- [70] iCDS
Research status
Publication gates
| primary url present | passed | |
|---|---|---|
| no aggregator cited | passed | |
| confidence tags full form | passed | |
| overlays have parameters trigger confidence | passed | |
| preempt section city specific | passed |
Data quality
- Per-village RDS section-level lot/setback/height tables — RDS documents are not published online; they require direct request from Covenant Administration, FOIA, or title-company retrieval from the Montgomery County Clerk. Per-village standards therefore status=unknown (u) rather than partial.
- Per-tract CDS standards for Town Center / Research Forest / Hughes Landing — also not published online; confirm at WDSC review for specific sites.
- Creekside Park Village is in Harris County, not Montgomery County — Harris County subdivision regulations (different from Montgomery Ch. 232 implementation) apply to that village. Dual-county regulatory footprint not separately extracted here.
- Springwoods Village (ExxonMobil) boundary verification — explicit confirmation that Springwoods is outside the Township boundary was performed by address/map comparison; no dedicated source citation captured.
- FEMA FIRM revision dates post-Harvey (2017) — current effective FIRM panel date not captured.
- Exact count of overlapping MUDs/WCIDs and their per-village service areas — list above is partial.
Known issues
Verification
| last_verified_at | 2026-04-19T00:00:00Z |
|---|---|
| verifier_specialist | verification-pass |
| verifier_version | 1.0 |
| verification_result | passed |
| atomic_claims_checked | 28 |
| atomic_claims_passed | 27 |
| atomic_claims_failed | 1 |
| failed_claims | reason: FABRICATION. The 2021 incorporation referendum was defeated. No such municipal code exists. This was FM-1 signal-on-shape combined with FM-7 fabricated-overlay. Corrected. |
| narrative_ref | narratives/the-woodlands-tx/the-woodlands-2026-04-19-v2.json |
Other cities in this state
Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.