Pflugerville, TX Zoning

Hybrid-pd-zoning. 21 districts · 10 overlays · 1 applicable state preemptions.

Overview

Code type
hybrid-pd
Naming convention
mixed
Naming convention by category
res_sfuse-type-index
res_mfdensity-encoded
comletter-code
indletter-code
corridorintensity-tier

Pflugerville runs a Euclidean base-zoning system (§4.2 residential + §4.3 non-residential) alongside a form-based Corridor District system (§4.4 CL3/CL4/CL5) specifically for the SH130 and SH45 corridors, plus discretionary PUD (§4.5.3) for large mixed-use projects. MF district numbers are density-encoded (MF-10 = 10 du/ac, MF-20 = 20 du/ac); SF/2-F/A/MH districts use lot-area-based dimensional control; commercial districts are letter-coded (O/NS/R/GB1/GB2) with intensity tier. Corridor districts use build-to-lines, max density floors (min 6–20 du/ac), height up to 120 ft in CL5 with MF-Urban designation, and impervious cover up to 85% — distinctly form-based and intended for SH130/SH45-adjacent parcels. Classification = hybrid-pd because Corridor Districts + PUD together can supersede the Euclidean base in any corridor/large-site context; neither pure Euclidean nor pure form-based fits. | sub_flags_raw=[corridor-overlay-base, sh130-sh45-growth-driven, form-based-corridors]

Worth knowing
  • CL3/CL4/CL5 Corridor Districts are BASE zones (§4.4), not overlays — applied specifically to parcels along SH130 and SH45 corridors. Form-based (build-to-lines, min-density floors, impervious-cover ceilings) within an otherwise Euclidean UDC. Ord. 1623-24-04-23 (eff. 2024-04-23) is the current corridor-district amendment.
  • Downtown District Overlay (DD) has FOUR sub-districts — Downtown Core (0 ft setback, 60 ft height, 2-story minimum, 100% lot coverage), Transitional Compatibility Zone (15 ft front, 35 ft height, 70% coverage), Pfluger Tract, South Downtown (SoDo), and Western Gateway. Core requires ≥50% of minimum parking OFF-SITE (§4.5.1).
  • Pecan Street special treatment inside DD Core — 25 ft build-to-line (vs. 15 ft elsewhere in Core) and 25 ft front setback preserve historic streetwall character.

+ 11 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

spec 5res_sf 5res_mf 3ind 3mu 3com 2
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
AAgriculture / Development Reservespec130,680 sf[4]35 ft[5][6]25[1] / 7.5[2] / 20[3]
SF-ESingle Family Estateres_sf21,780 sf[10]35 ft[11]2[12]25[7] / 7.5[8] / 20[9]
SF-SSingle Family Suburbanres_sf9,000 sf[16]35 ft[17]4.84[18]25[13] / 7.5[14] / 20[15]
SF-RSingle Family Residentialres_sf6,250 sf[22]35 ft[23]6.97[24]25[19] / 5[20] / 20[21]
SF-MUSingle Family Mixed Use Residentialres_sf[28]35 ft[29]25[25] / 5[26] / 20[27]
2-FTwo Family Residentialres_sf9,000 sf[33]35 ft[34]9.68[35]15[30] / 5[31] / 20[32]
MF-10Multi-Family 10res_mf[39]38 ft[40]10[41]15[36] / 10[37] / 15[38]
MF-20Multi-Family 20res_mf[45]38 ft[46]20[47]15[42] / 10[43] / 15[44]
MHManufactured Housingres_mf4,500 sf[51]24 ft[52]8[53]25[48] / 20[49] / 15[50]
PFPublic Facilities and Open Spacespec[57]25 ft[58]25[59]25[54] / 10[55] / 20[56]
OOfficespec25 ft[63]25[64]15[60] / 10[61] / 20[62]
NSNeighborhood Servicespec25 ft[68]25[69]15[65] / 10[66] / 20[67]
RRetailspec35 ft[73]15[70] / 10[71] / 20[72]
GB1General Business 1com50 ft[77]15[74] / 10[75] / 20[76]
GB2General Business 2com50 ft[81]15[78] / 10[79] / 20[80]
CICampus Industrialind85 ft[85]80[86]15[82] / 10[83] / 25[84]
LILight Industrialind50 ft[90]80[91]15[87] / 10[88] / 25[89]
GIGeneral Industrialind100 ft[95]80[96]15[92] / 30[93] / 25[94]
CL3Corridor Level 3 — Suburban (SH130/SH45 Neighborhood-scale)mu35 ft[98]65[99]20[100]15[97] / /
CL4Corridor Level 4 — Urban (SH130/SH45 Mixed-Use/Innovation)mu[{'v': 60, 'c': 'c§4.4.1', 'note': 'Baseline'}, {'v': 100, 'c': 'c§4.4.1', 'note': 'With Multi-Family Urban designation'}] ft85[102]75[103]15[101] / /
CL5Corridor Level 5 — Urban Center (SH130/SH45 Dense Mixed-Use Core)mu[{'v': 85, 'c': 'c§4.4.1', 'note': 'Baseline'}, {'v': 120, 'c': 'c§4.4.1', 'note': 'With Multi-Family Urban designation'}] ft85[105]90[106]15[104] / /

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

DD
Downtown District Overlay
DT
UDC §4.5.1

Mapped overlay with four sub-districts: Downtown Core, Transitional Compatibility Zone (TCZ), Pfluger Tract, South Downtown (SoDo), and Western Gateway — centered on Pfluger Main Street / Pecan Street historic downtown core.

max_height_ft_core60[107]
max_height_ft_core_across_from_sf50[108]
max_height_ft_core_adjacent_to_residential35[109]
max_height_ft_tcz35[110]
min_front_setback_ft_core0[111]
min_front_setback_ft_pecan_street25[112]
build_to_line_ft_core15[113]
tcz_setbacks15 ft front, 15 ft side street, 5 ft interior side, 10 ft rear[114]
max_lot_coverage_core_pct100[115]
max_lot_coverage_tcz_pct70[116]
min_stories_core2[117]
parking_off_site_requirement_pct50[118]
bar_tavern_distance_from_sf_ft200[119]
prohibited_usesAssisted living, nursing homes, manufactured homes, most automotive and industrial uses[120]
685
685 Commercial Park Overlay District
COR
UDC §4.5.2

SH 130 / F.M. 685 corridor — mapped 685 Commercial Park subdivision and adjacent tracts; two development areas with differing standards.

dev_area_2_materialsBrick, stone, stucco, metal, EIFS (above 9 ft), glass (max 50%)[121]
dev_area_2_prohibited_materialsPink and gold glass prohibited[122]
dev_area_2_roof_pitchGable/hip 1:12 to 8:12 required[123]
dev_area_2_sidewalksNot required[124]
dev_area_2_landscape_min_trees_per_lot2[125]
dev_area_2_irrigationHand-watering permitted in lieu of irrigation system[126]
dev_area_2_max_fence_height_ft8[127]
dev_area_1_standardsFollow base UDC standards (no modifications)[128]
PUD
Planned Unit Development District
SPD
UDC §4.5.3

No fixed geography — applies to proposed mixed-use or innovative developments ≥20 acres (or smaller sites with City Council consent). Floating district activated via PUD ordinance + regulating plan.

min_size_acres20[129]
regulating_plan_required1[130]
development_code_required1[131]
comprehensive_plan_consistency_required1[132]
minor_amendment_administrative1[133]
major_amendment_council_approval1[134]
AEAH
Austin Executive Airport Hazard Overlay District
SPEC
UDC §4.5.4

Areas beneath approach, conical, horizontal, and transitional surfaces relative to Austin Executive Airport (KEDC) Runway 13/31 and planned Runway 13/34; depicted on 'Austin Executive Airport Height and Hazard Zoning Map' prepared by KSA Engineers, dated April 2015.

approach_surface_extent_ft50,000[135]
conical_surface_slope20:1 horizontal-to-vertical[136]
horizontal_surface_height_ft_msl770[137]
horizontal_surface_radius_ft10,000[138]
transitional_surface_slope7:1 horizontal-to-vertical[139]
airport_hazard_uses_prohibited1[140]
nonconforming_preservation1[141]
variance_authorityBoard of Adjustment[142]
HP
Historic Preservation / Heritage Overlay
HP
not_found

No dedicated Historic Preservation or Heritage overlay found in UDC Subchapter 4 §4.5 (only DD, 685, PUD, AEAH). Pflugerville's historic character is addressed via the Downtown District Overlay (DD) which covers the Pfluger Main Street / Pecan Street historic core, not a separate HP overlay.

FH
Floodplain / Flood Hazard Overlay
FP
under_review

FEMA FIRM Zones A/AE along Gilleland Creek and tributaries; regulatory floodplain boundaries maintained by City Development Engineering.

nfip_participation1
fema_firm_adoption1
CORR
Corridor / Highway Overlay (SH130, SH45)
COR
UDC §4.4 (Corridor Districts CL3/CL4/CL5)

Parcels within SH130 and SH45 corridor — NOT an overlay in UDC §4.5, but BASE CORRIDOR DISTRICTS in §4.4. CL3/CL4/CL5 are form-based zoning tiers (Suburban/Urban/Urban Center) specifically established for corridor parcels. Functionally performs the role of a corridor overlay in other cities.

streetscape_yard_ft15[143]
vegetative_bufferyard_ft30[144]
adjacency_setback_to_sf_ft30[145]
building_height_setback_rule1 ft height : 2 ft setback (commercial) OR 5 ft (multi-family) for structures >20 ft abutting SF residential[146]
ENV
Environmental / Stream Corridor Buffer Overlay
ENV
not_found

No dedicated Environmental, Stream Buffer, or Riparian overlay found in UDC Subchapter 4 §4.5. Gilleland Creek buffer treatment likely handled via flood damage prevention ordinance + subdivision standards (UDC §12 Tree Preservation, §14 Public Parkland and Open Space), not as a §4.5 mapped overlay.

TOD
Transit-Oriented Development / TOD Overlay
TOD
not_found

No TOD overlay in UDC — Pflugerville has no fixed-rail transit; Capital Metro bus service does not anchor dedicated station-area zoning. CL4/CL5 corridor districts (SH130/SH45) incorporate walkable-mixed-use form standards (build-to-lines, min density 20 du/ac, max 75–90 du/ac) that serve a TOD-like role without being labeled TOD.

AH
Affordable Housing Density Bonus
AH
not_found

No affordable housing density bonus overlay found in UDC Subchapter 4.

State preemptions

Qualifying condition
{"parcel_lot_area_threshold_sf": 4000, "threshold_source": "SB 15 \u00a7X \u2014 limits city regulation of setbacks/parking/height/FAR on lots \u22644,000 sf", "applies_statewide": true, "pflugerville_has_sub_4000_sf_lots": "Yes \u2014 CL3 townhome minimum lot is 2,500 sf (\u00a74.4.1); some legacy platted lots may be <4,000 sf", "vintage": "2026-04-19", "result": "SB 15 applies statewide to qualifying small lots. Pflugerville's CL3 townhome minimum (2,500 sf) and any legacy lots \u22644,000 sf are subject to SB 15 limitations on setbacks, parking, height, and FAR regulation."} | preempting_law=Texas SB 15 (88th Legislature, 2025) ; preempted_fields=['setback_ft', 'parking_ratio', 'max_height_ft', 'max_far'] ; preempted_effective_date=2025-09-01
Non-applicable laws (1)
Qualifying condition
{"city_population": 66819, "city_population_vintage": "2024-07-01 (Census PEP)", "city_population_threshold": 150000, "city_population_passes": false, "county_population": 1326436, "county_population_vintage": "2024-07-01 (Census PEP)", "county_population_threshold": 300000, "county_population_passes": true, "result": "City fails population gate (66,819 < 150,000); Travis County passes. Both gates must pass for SB 840 to apply. Pflugerville is NOT subject to SB 840."} | preempting_law=Texas SB 840 (88th Legislature, 2025) ; preempted_value=n/a — law does not apply ; preempted_effective_date=2025-09-01

Adopted building codes

Home rule; major cities on 2024 IBC

2012 (state min)
2021
2023
Local adoption
IECC (Residential)
2015
IECC (Commercial)
2015

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Amendment history

DateKindCitation
2026-04-19retrieved at
2024-04-23amendment effectiveOrd. 1623-24-04-23 (Corridor Districts §4.4 update)
2018-07-10amendment effectiveOrd. 1355-18-07-10 (Zoning Districts Established §4.1)
2015-02-24adoptionOrd. 1203-15-02-24 (UDC adoption)

Quirks & notes

  • CL3/CL4/CL5 Corridor Districts are BASE zones (§4.4), not overlays — applied specifically to parcels along SH130 and SH45 corridors. Form-based (build-to-lines, min-density floors, impervious-cover ceilings) within an otherwise Euclidean UDC. Ord. 1623-24-04-23 (eff. 2024-04-23) is the current corridor-district amendment.
  • Downtown District Overlay (DD) has FOUR sub-districts — Downtown Core (0 ft setback, 60 ft height, 2-story minimum, 100% lot coverage), Transitional Compatibility Zone (15 ft front, 35 ft height, 70% coverage), Pfluger Tract, South Downtown (SoDo), and Western Gateway. Core requires ≥50% of minimum parking OFF-SITE (§4.5.1).
  • Pecan Street special treatment inside DD Core — 25 ft build-to-line (vs. 15 ft elsewhere in Core) and 25 ft front setback preserve historic streetwall character.
  • MF-10 and MF-20 district numbers are density-encoded: 10 du/ac and 20 du/ac respectively; lot area is N/A (no minimum) in these districts.
  • SB 840 does NOT apply — Pflugerville (~67K) below 150K city population threshold. City retains full legislative authority over density, height, setbacks, parking on commercial/office/retail parcels.
  • SB 15 applies statewide — small-lot deregulation (≤4,000 sf) constrains Pflugerville's authority over setbacks/parking/height/FAR on CL3 townhome lots (2,500 sf) and any legacy sub-4,000 sf lots.
  • Austin Executive Airport Hazard Overlay (AEAH) — 14 CFR Part 77-aligned approach/conical/horizontal/transitional surfaces; 150-ft horizontal surface cap above 620 MSL airport elevation (770 ft MSL absolute); depicted on KSA Engineers' April 2015 map (§4.5.4).
  • 685 Commercial Park Overlay — highly prescriptive architectural standards for 'Development Area 2' including prohibited 'pink and gold glass,' required gable/hip roof pitch 1:12–8:12, and permitted chain-link fencing up to 8 ft — distinctive standards for this single SH130/FM685 subdivision.
  • Building height setback rule — structures >20 ft abutting single-family residential require 1 ft additional setback per 1 ft additional height (commercial) OR 2 ft setback per 1 ft height step (multi-family). Rule applies across §4.3 and §4.4.
  • No dedicated Floodplain overlay in UDC §4.5 — flood regulation lives in Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (Subchapter 9 or standalone), not as a mapped §4.5 overlay district. V1 inferred 'FH' overlay code is NOT the actual UDC structure.
  • No dedicated Historic Preservation, Stream/Environmental, TOD, or Affordable Housing overlay — only 4 overlays in §4.5 (DD, 685, PUD, AEAH). Environmental handled via Subchapter 12 (Tree Preservation) and Subchapter 14 (Public Parkland/Open Space); historic character captured via DD Core sub-district.
  • Campus Industrial (CI) district permits max 85 ft height — highest non-corridor, non-overlay district; positioned for corporate/R&D campuses and (per market pattern) data center use. GI goes to 100 ft.
  • PUD district (§4.5.3) is a floating district — minimum 20 acres (or smaller with Council consent); project-specific regulating plan and development code supersede base; Council-approved minor amendments require meeting 8 criteria, major require new application.
  • EncodePlus SPA platform — JS-rendered document viewer; deep-section HTML fetches return navigation shell only. Reliable path is /doc-view.aspx?tocid=XXX&print=1 print-view which returns full section text.

Formulas

Definitions

height
Grade to highest point of structure (including roof peak/equipment) per UDC §4.2–§4.4 tables.
lot_coverage
Building footprint / lot area.
impervious_cover
All hardscape (buildings, driveways, parking, sidewalks) / lot area; capped per district in §4.3/§4.4.
far
Gross floor area / lot area (not consistently published in §4.3 dimensional table).
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross acre; explicit in MF-10 (10 du/ac) and MF-20 (20 du/ac); MH capped at 8 du/ac; corridor districts use min-density floors + max ceilings.
setback_front
Front property line to nearest building face.
setback_side
Side property line to nearest building face (interior vs. street side distinguished in corridor districts).
setback_rear
Rear property line to nearest building face.
build_to_line
Maximum front setback requirement (CL4/CL5 require building placed <25 ft from property line on >50% of frontage, except toll/frontage roads).
parking
Spaces per dwelling unit; Downtown Overlay requires ≥50% of minimum required parking to be off-site.

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_impervious_sf
lot_area_sf * impervious_cover
max_units_from_density
lot_area_sf * du_ac / 43560
building_height_setback_rule
For structures >20 ft abutting single-family residential zoning: 1 ft additional height requires 2 ft additional setback (commercial base) OR 5 ft (multi-family base). Per §4.4 corridor districts.

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

Sort by
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
ft
Floor area ratio
Lot coverage
%
Setbacks (F / S / R)
ft
Parking
/unit
Max density
du/ac
Min lot size
sf
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Primary source
city-hosted · Subchapter 4 (base districts §4.1–§4.4); Subchapter 4 §4.5 (Special Districts and Overlays) · Ord. 1355-18-07-10 (UDC recodification, eff. 2018-07-10) + Ord. 1623-24-04-23 (Corridor District amendments, eff. 2024-04-23) · retrieved 2026-04-19

EncodePlus is a JS-rendered document viewer; per-section HTML deep-fetches return navigation shell only, but /doc-view.aspx?tocid=004.00x&print=1 print-view successfully returned full Subchapter 4 text. Core district roster + overlays + CL3/4/5 corridor parameters all captured from primary print-view on 2026-04-19. Secondary v1→v2 flip: v1 mis-inferred Euclidean SF-E/SF-S/SF-C/TH/MF-L/MF-M/MF-H + NC/GC/RC/OP/MU-TC/LI/HI/PUB taxonomy (extrapolated from Austin/Round Rock precedent). Actual district list is 9 residential (A, SF-E, SF-S, SF-R, SF-MU, 2-F, MF-10, MF-20, MH) + 9 non-residential (PF, O, NS, R, GB1, GB2, CI, LI, GI) + 3 corridor (CL3, CL4, CL5 — form-based) + 4 overlays (DD, 685 Commercial Park, PUD, Austin Executive Airport Hazard). V1 overlay roster (FH, TC-130, MU-SH, SC, ETJ) was entirely inferred and is NOT present in the actual UDC by those codes — TC-130 corresponds to CL3/CL4/CL5 base districts (not an overlay), MU-SH has no counterpart (Stone Hill Town Center is a retail development, not a zoning overlay), FH/floodplain is handled in Subchapter 9 design provisions not as a mapped overlay in §4.5, ETJ is a jurisdictional concept not an overlay.

Citations
  1. [1] §4.2
  2. [2] §4.2
  3. [3] §4.2
  4. [4] §4.2
  5. [5] §4.2
  6. [6] §4.2
  7. [7] §4.2
  8. [8] §4.2
  9. [9] §4.2
  10. [10] §4.2
  11. [11] §4.2
  12. [12] §4.2
  13. [13] §4.2
  14. [14] §4.2
  15. [15] §4.2
  16. [16] §4.2
  17. [17] §4.2
  18. [18] §4.2
  19. [19] §4.2
  20. [20] §4.2
  21. [21] §4.2
  22. [22] §4.2
  23. [23] §4.2
  24. [24] §4.2
  25. [25] §4.2
  26. [26] §4.2
  27. [27] §4.2
  28. [28] §4.2
  29. [29] §4.2
  30. [30] §4.2
  31. [31] §4.2
  32. [32] §4.2
  33. [33] §4.2
  34. [34] §4.2
  35. [35] §4.2
  36. [36] §4.2
  37. [37] §4.2
  38. [38] §4.2
  39. [39] §4.2
  40. [40] §4.2
  41. [41] §4.2
  42. [42] §4.2
  43. [43] §4.2
  44. [44] §4.2
  45. [45] §4.2
  46. [46] §4.2
  47. [47] §4.2
  48. [48] §4.2
  49. [49] §4.2
  50. [50] §4.2
  51. [51] §4.2
  52. [52] §4.2
  53. [53] §4.2
  54. [54] §4.3
  55. [55] §4.3
  56. [56] §4.3
  57. [57] §4.3
  58. [58] §4.3
  59. [59] §4.3
  60. [60] §4.3
  61. [61] §4.3
  62. [62] §4.3
  63. [63] §4.3
  64. [64] §4.3
  65. [65] §4.3
  66. [66] §4.3
  67. [67] §4.3
  68. [68] §4.3
  69. [69] §4.3
  70. [70] §4.3
  71. [71] §4.3
  72. [72] §4.3
  73. [73] §4.3
  74. [74] §4.3
  75. [75] §4.3
  76. [76] §4.3
  77. [77] §4.3
  78. [78] §4.3
  79. [79] §4.3
  80. [80] §4.3
  81. [81] §4.3
  82. [82] §4.3
  83. [83] §4.3
  84. [84] §4.3
  85. [85] §4.3
  86. [86] §4.3
  87. [87] §4.3
  88. [88] §4.3
  89. [89] §4.3
  90. [90] §4.3
  91. [91] §4.3
  92. [92] §4.3
  93. [93] §4.3
  94. [94] §4.3
  95. [95] §4.3
  96. [96] §4.3
  97. [97] §4.4.1
  98. [98] §4.4.1
  99. [99] §4.4.1
  100. [100] §4.4.1
  101. [101] §4.4.1
  102. [102] §4.4.1
  103. [103] §4.4.1
  104. [104] §4.4.1
  105. [105] §4.4.1
  106. [106] §4.4.1
  107. [107] §4.5.1
  108. [108] §4.5.1
  109. [109] §4.5.1
  110. [110] §4.5.1
  111. [111] §4.5.1
  112. [112] §4.5.1
  113. [113] §4.5.1
  114. [114] §4.5.1
  115. [115] §4.5.1
  116. [116] §4.5.1
  117. [117] §4.5.1
  118. [118] §4.5.1
  119. [119] §4.5.1
  120. [120] §4.5.1
  121. [121] §4.5.2
  122. [122] §4.5.2
  123. [123] §4.5.2
  124. [124] §4.5.2
  125. [125] §4.5.2
  126. [126] §4.5.2
  127. [127] §4.5.2
  128. [128] §4.5.2
  129. [129] §4.5.3
  130. [130] §4.5.3
  131. [131] §4.5.3
  132. [132] §4.5.3
  133. [133] §4.5.3
  134. [134] §4.5.3
  135. [135] §4.5.4
  136. [136] §4.5.4
  137. [137] §4.5.4
  138. [138] §4.5.4
  139. [139] §4.5.4
  140. [140] §4.5.4
  141. [141] §4.5.4
  142. [142] §4.5.4
  143. [143] §4.4.1
  144. [144] §4.4.1
  145. [145] §4.4.1
  146. [146] §4.4.1

Research status

Publication gates

primary url presentpassedevidence=source.primary_url = https://online.encodeplus.com/regs/pflugerville/doc-viewer.aspx (city-hosted EncodePlus; not an aggregator)
no aggregator citedpassedevidence=scan clean — no zoneomics/steadily/siteplanguide/etc. cited
confidence tags full formpassedevidence=19/22 districts fully confirmed with §4.2/§4.3/§4.4.1 citations; SF-MU is partial (table incomplete), A/SF-E/SF-S/SF-R/2-F derive du_ac from lot-area ratio (tagged p§4.2); every confirmed numeric carries a §-citation
overlays have parameters trigger confidencepassedevidence=DD (§4.5.1), 685 (§4.5.2), PUD (§4.5.3), AEAH (§4.5.4) all have non-empty parameters, geographic_trigger, status:confirmed, citation. FH partial (documented under_review with paired companion). HP/ENV/TOD/AH not_found with search_performed companion. CORR not_applicable with reason.
preempt section city specificpassedevidence=2 laws with city-specific qualifying_condition_checked — SB 840 (applies:false with numeric population gates documented) + SB 15 (applies:true with CL3 townhome 2,500 sf trigger documented)

Known issues

freshness:volatile

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.