Zoning › California › Placer County › Roseville

Roseville, CA Zoning

Euclidean-zoning. 21 districts · 8 overlays · 7 applicable state preemptions.

Overview

Code type
euclidean
Naming convention
use-type-index

Euclidean Title 19 with use-type base districts (R1, RS, R2, R3, RMU residential; BP, NC, CC, GC, HC, RC, CBD, CMU, HD commercial; MP, M1, M2, MMU industrial; OS, PR, P/QP, UR special) plus additive overlays (/DS Design Standards, /FW Floodway, /FF Floodway Fringe, PD Planned Development, /SA Special Area). Combining designations (FP Floodplain, SA Study Area, VC Village Center) appear on the General Plan layer. Twenty-plus adopted Specific Plans cover most newly-developing greenfield areas and dominate large-tract development; each Specific Plan tailors base Title 19 standards. Not form-based. R-naming is index-style (R1→R3 increasing intensity), not lot-size-encoded.

Worth knowing
  • Roseville is the largest city in Placer County (population ~156,527 in 2025; growing ~2.2% annually) and the principal employment / retail center for the South Placer subregion. Westfield Galleria at Roseville (RC zone) is one of the largest regional malls in Northern California. Roseville Auto Mall is a regional auto-retail concentration.
  • Capitol Corridor passenger rail at Roseville Station (201 Pacific Street, Old Town) is the dominant AB 2097 trigger. Multiple weekday round-trips on the Auburn-Sacramento-Oakland-San Jose corridor. The 0.5 mi station buffer overlaps the entire CBD + Old Town HD overlay + adjacent RMU / CMU / GC corridor parcels. SacRT light rail does NOT yet reach Roseville (Green Line extension future); local bus headways generally below AB 2097 15-min threshold.
  • 20+ adopted Specific Plans dominate development pattern: Amoruso Ranch, Atlantic Street Corridor, Creekview, Del Webb (Sun City Roseville), Downtown, Highland Reserve North, North Central Roseville, North Roseville, Northeast Roseville, Northwest Roseville, Riverside Gateway, Sierra Vista, Southeast Roseville, Stoneridge, West Roseville. Implementation via /SA Special Area combining overlay (§19.18.030) which can modify both use types AND dimensional standards by reference to Specific Plan. /SA is the primary tailored-zoning mechanism.

+ 6 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

com 6res_sf 3mu 3ind 3spec 3res_mf 1cbd 1ag 1
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
R1Single Family Residentialres_sf6,000 sf[4]35 ft[5]0.45[6]—6.9[7]2[8]20[1] / 5[2] / 10[3]
RSSmall Lot Residentialres_sf4,500 sf[12]35 ft[13]——9[14]2[15]15[9] / 5[10] / 10[11]
R2Two-Family Residentialres_sf6,000 sf[19]35 ft[20]0.4[21]—12.9[22]2[23]20[16] / 5[17] / 10[18]
R3Attached Housingres_mf6,000 sf[27]45 ft[28]0.5[29]——[30]1.5[31]20[24] / 5[25] / 20[26]
RMUResidential Mixed Usemu—[35]—[36]—[37]——[38]0[39]—[32] / —[33] / —[34]
BPBusiness Professionalcom—[43]—[44]—[45]—[46]——[47]—[40] / —[41] / —[42]
NCNeighborhood Commercialcom—[51]—[52]—[53]—[54]——[55]—[48] / —[49] / —[50]
CCCommunity Commercialcom—[59]—[60]—[61]—[62]——[63]—[56] / —[57] / —[58]
GCGeneral Commercialcom—[67]—[68]—[69]—[70]——[71]—[64] / —[65] / —[66]
HCHighway Commercialcom—[75]—[76]—[77]—[78]——[79]—[72] / —[73] / —[74]
RCRegional Commercialcom—[83]—[84]—[85]—[86]——[87]—[80] / —[81] / —[82]
CBDCentral Business Districtcbd—[91]—[92]—[93]—[94]—[95]0[96]—[88] / —[89] / —[90]
CMUCommercial Mixed Usemu—[100]—[101]—[102]—[103]——[104]—[97] / —[98] / —[99]
MPIndustrial/Business Parkind—[108]—[109]—[110]—[111]——[112]—[105] / —[106] / —[107]
M1Light Industrialind—[116]—[117]—[118]—[119]——[120]—[113] / —[114] / —[115]
M2General Industrialind—[124]—[125]—[126]—[127]——[128]—[121] / —[122] / —[123]
MMUIndustrial Mixed Usemu—[132]—[133]—[134]—[135]——[136]—[129] / —[130] / —[131]
OSOpen Spacespec——[137]—[138]———— / — / —
PRPark and Recreationspec——[139]—[140]———[141]— / — / —
P/QPPublic/Quasi Publicspec——[142]—[143]———[144]— / — / —
URUrban Reserveag—[145]—[146]——0.1[147]—— / — / —

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

HD
Old Town Historic District
HP
Title 19 Old Town Historic District; applied to original commercial core of Roseville along Vernon St, Pacific St, Atlantic St (Old Town area)

The original commercial core of Roseville (Old Town area centered on Vernon St, Pacific St, Atlantic St, near Roseville Capitol Corridor Station). Boundaries per Title 19 HD designation on the zoning map. Acknowledges historic and architectural significance of Old Town buildings dating to the city's late 19th / early 20th century railroad-town origin.

design_review_for_historic_resources1[148]
secretary_of_interior_standards1[149]
demolition_review_required1[150]
additive_to_base1[151]
sb9_exclusion_conditional1[152]
AB2097_coincidence1[153]
/DS
Design Standards Overlay
spec
Title 19 Design Standards combining district; applied via combining designation suffix (/DS) on zoning map

Areas designated /DS on the Roseville zoning map. Applied on top of any base district where the City has adopted specific objective design standards (e.g., Sun City Roseville and Del Webb senior communities, major Specific Plan villages, corridor-frontage parcels along Douglas Blvd / Sunrise Ave / Atlantic St). Boundaries per zoning map.

design_review_required1[154]
objective_design_standards_apply1[155]
modifies_base_dimensional_standards0[156]
additive_to_base1[157]
sb423_50pct_design_review_bypass1[158]
/FW
Floodway Overlay
FP
Title 19 Floodway overlay; areas in and along Dry Creek, Linda Creek, Cirby Creek, and Antelope Creek per Official Floodplain Maps (dated October 1973, maintained by Public Works Director) + FEMA FIRM

The /FW Floodway overlay applies to floodway-mapped lands along Dry Creek, Linda Creek, Cirby Creek, and Antelope Creek as shown on the City's Official Floodplain Maps (October 1973) and current FEMA FIRM panels for Placer County. Roseville is an NFIP participating community.

fema_firm_basis1[159]
no_rise_certification1[160]
no_residential_in_floodway1[161]
substantial_damage_threshold_pct50[162]
additive_to_base1[163]
fema_sfha_sb9_exclusion_trigger1[164]
/FF
Floodway Fringe Overlay
FP
Title 19 Floodway Fringe overlay; areas in and along Dry Creek, Linda Creek, Cirby Creek, and Antelope Creek per Official Floodplain Maps (October 1973)

The /FF Floodway Fringe overlay applies to flood-fringe lands (within SFHA but outside the floodway) along Dry Creek, Linda Creek, Cirby Creek, and Antelope Creek per Official Floodplain Maps and FEMA FIRM panels.

fema_firm_basis1[165]
lowest_floor_elevation_ft_above_bfe1[166]
residential_permitted_with_flood_proofing1[167]
substantial_damage_threshold_pct50[168]
additive_to_base1[169]
fema_sfha_sb9_exclusion_trigger1[170]
PD
Planned Development Overlay
PD
Title 19 Planned Development overlay; applied via PD designation on zoning map; implementing ordinance per individual PD adopted at rezone

Areas designated PD on the Roseville zoning map. Used for large-tract integrated developments where conventional zoning is insufficient (e.g., master-planned communities, mixed-use centers within Specific Plan areas). Each PD area has its own implementing ordinance.

individual_pd_ordinance1[171]
modifies_base_standards1[172]
specific_plan_overlay_distinction1[173]
ministerial_pathway_applicability1[174]
additive_to_base0[175]
/SA
Special Area Overlay
spec
Title 19 §19.18.030 Special Area district — combining overlay that references regulations adopted in a Specific Plan or rezoning ordinance

Areas designated /SA on the zoning map. Used across Roseville's 20+ adopted Specific Plans (Amoruso Ranch, Atlantic Street Corridor, Creekview, Del Webb, Downtown, Highland Reserve North, North Central Roseville, North Roseville, Northeast Roseville, Northwest Roseville, Riverside Gateway, Sierra Vista, Southeast Roseville, Stoneridge, West Roseville, etc.) to layer Specific-Plan-specific rules onto base zoning.

modifies_underlying_use_types1[176]
modifies_underlying_dimensional_standards1[177]
applies_via_specific_plan1[178]
additive_to_base1[179]
ministerial_pathway_applicability1[180]
RMU
Residential Mixed Use
SPEC
Title 19 RMU district — residential mixed-use base zone (§19.10.030 includes RMU column); supports vertical/horizontal mixed-use residential + commercial near transit

RMU base district applied to mixed-use residential areas — typically Downtown / Old Town corridor frontages near Roseville Station (Capitol Corridor) and in adopted Specific Plan mixed-use villages (Highland Reserve North, North Central Roseville, etc.).

minimum_density—[181]
setbacks_per_overlay_or_specific_plan1[182]
height_per_overlay_or_specific_plan1[183]
lot_coverage_per_overlay_or_specific_plan1[184]
ground_floor_active_use_typical1[185]
ab2097_capitol_corridor_buffer1[186]
ALUC
Placer County ALUC Airport Influence (Lincoln Regional + Auburn Municipal)
ENV
Placer County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (PCTPA, adopted 2021-09-22; covers Lincoln Regional Airport and Auburn Municipal Airport)

Roseville is within the Placer County ALUC jurisdiction. Lincoln Regional Airport (KLHM) is ~10 mi NW of Roseville in Lincoln; Auburn Municipal Airport (KAUN) is ~20 mi NE in Auburn. ALUCP noise/safety/airspace zones can extend into northern Roseville for Lincoln Regional approach corridors. FAA Part 77 imaginary surfaces apply universally within radius of each airport.

noise_contour_trigger_cnel55[187]
cnel_65_residential_restriction1[188]
faa_part_77_surfaces1[189]
safety_zone_use_limits1[190]
federal_preemption_height1[191]
additive_to_base1[192]

State preemptions

CA-ADU-GC§66411.7-66411.8applies
Qualifying condition
All CA cities subject. Roseville's R1, RS, R2, R3, and RMU districts (residential or mixed-use components) must permit ADUs by-right per state law. Title 19 Chapter 19.60 implements ADU/JADU standards locally. §19.10.030 footnote (11) explicitly references Ch. 19.60: 'A combination of up to two accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling units are permitted within areas zoned to allow single-family, two-family or multi-family residential use.' | Title: Accessory Dwelling Units / JADUs | Citation: GC §66411.7, §66411.8; SB 897 + AB 2221 (2022); SB 1211 (eff. 2025-01-01)
Effect
Ministerial approval with 60-day shot clock; up to 1,200 sf detached ADUs; up to 500 sf JADUs; no owner-occupancy requirement; no parking within 0.5 mi of transit (Roseville Station qualifies as Capitol Corridor major transit stop), historic district (Old Town HD), or if ADU within existing structure; up to 8 ADUs on qualifying multifamily lots under SB 1211 (effective 2025-01-01). Preempts any Title 19 / Ch. 19.60 provision imposing minimum lot size, owner-occupancy beyond statute, or additional parking within the 0.5 mi Roseville Station buffer. /FW Floodway and /FF Floodway Fringe overlay restrictions and Old Town HD historic design review survive as objective constraints but do not block ministerial approval.
CA-SB9-GC§65852.21-66411.7applies
Qualifying condition
Roseville is a CA general-law city with R1 (Single Family Residential) and RS (Small Lot Residential) single-family districts subject to SB 9. R2 (Two-Family Residential) is excluded from SB 9 (per state law, applies only to single-family-zoned parcels). SB 9 applies per-parcel conditional on exclusions. Roseville exclusion triggers: FEMA SFHA along Dry Creek, Linda Creek, Cirby Creek, and Antelope Creek (/FW and /FF overlay zones — per-parcel); Old Town Historic District properties where CEQA-adopted; designated landmark properties subject to CEQA review (per §65852.21(a)(2)(D)). No coastal zone (Roseville is ~110 mi inland). CalFire fire hazard severity zones in Roseville city limits are predominantly 'moderate' (not 'very high'); VHFHSZ exclusion typically does NOT trigger within Roseville. Lincoln Regional Airport and Auburn Municipal Airport ALUC influence area may impose hazard-related restrictions but is not a §65852.21 exclusion (FAA airspace is federal, not in the state exclusion list). | Title: SB 9 — California HOME Act (Lot Splits + Duplex Conversion) | Citation: GC §65852.21, §66411.7; SB 450 (2024) | per_parcel_conditional: True | Exclusions: FEMA SFHA covered by /FW Floodway and /FF Floodway Fringe overlays (Dry Creek, Linda Creek, Cirby Creek, Antelope Creek corridors, per-parcel); CalFire moderate/high/very-high fire hazard severity zones (Roseville city limits predominantly 'moderate' — limited VHFHSZ exclusion impact within city; eastern Placer County foothills outside city); coastal zone (N/A — Roseville is ~110 mi inland); CEQA-adopted historic districts (Old Town HD CEQA-adoption status per-designation; individual landmark designations typically not triggering this exclusion); Placer County ALUCP RPZ / inner approach safety zones (not a §65852.21 enumerated exclusion but local override on health/safety grounds may apply)
Effect
Ministerial up-to-4-units on qualifying R1/RS parcels (lot split + duplex on each resulting lot). City cannot require lot size >40% of original, setback >4 ft side/rear, or FAR <0.8 on resulting lots. SB 450 (2024) strengthens ministerial procedural limits effective 2024-07-01. R1 6,000 sf minimum and RS 4,275-4,500 sf minima cannot be used to defeat SB 9 ministerial approval — state preemption controls. /FW Floodway-overlay parcels and CEQA-adopted Old Town HD parcels can be excluded per-parcel per §65852.21(a)(2).
CA-DensityBonus-GC§65915applies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Applies to any Roseville project meeting affordability thresholds (5% VLI, 10% LI, 10% moderate for-sale, or 100% affordable). AB 1287 allows stacking to achieve up to 100% density bonus. | Title: State Density Bonus Law + AB 1287 (2023) | Citation: GC §65915; AB 1287 (2023)
Effect
Up to 100% density bonus (AB 1287 stacked) on R3 (Attached Housing), R2 (Two-Family), RMU (Residential Mixed Use), CMU (Commercial Mixed Use), CBD (Central Business District), and qualifying commercial-corridor sites. Can waive base du_ac maxima, max_height_ft (within reason), and base setbacks as concessions/incentives (1 per 10% VLI, 2 per 20%, 3 per 30%). State §65915(p) parking ratios (0.5 studios/1BR; 1.0 for 2-3BR; 1.5 for 4+BR) preempt Title 19 / Ch. 19.30 parking on affordable components. Downtown CBD + /SA Specific Plan parcels still subject to §65915 stacking. Old Town HD historic design review survives density bonus waivers (preservation is statutory, not procedural).
CA-AB2097applies
Qualifying condition
Roseville is served by Capitol Corridor passenger rail at Roseville Station (201 Pacific Street, Old Town/Downtown). Capitol Corridor (Amtrak/CCJPA) operates as intercity passenger rail on the Auburn-Sacramento-Oakland-San Jose route with multiple weekday round-trips. Roseville Station qualifies as a 'major transit stop' under CA PRC §21064.3 (intercity rail station). Parcels within 0.5 mi of Roseville Station are AB 2097 eligible. Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) does NOT currently operate light rail in Roseville (planned Green Line extension future). Local bus (Roseville Transit, Placer County Transit) headways generally do not meet the 15-min peak threshold for AB 2097 'major transit stop' status, so Roseville Station rail corridor is the dominant AB 2097 trigger. Numeric inputs: Roseville population 156,527 (2025 Census-derived); county population 423,970; AB 2097 has no population threshold (statewide applicable). | Title: AB 2097 — Parking Mandate Elimination Near Transit | Citation: GC §65863.2 (effective 2023-01-01)
Effect
No minimum parking may be required for residential, commercial, or mixed-use within 0.5 mi of Roseville Station (Capitol Corridor). Preempts Title 19 / Ch. 19.30 parking ratios within buffer. The 0.5 mi Roseville Station buffer substantially overlaps the CBD (Central Business District), Old Town HD overlay, and adjacent RMU / CMU / GC corridor parcels. AB 2097 is the dominant parking regulation in downtown Roseville. AB 2097 does NOT apply to suburban R1/RS/R2/R3 districts beyond the 0.5 mi buffer.
CA-SB423-GC§65913.4applies
Qualifying condition
Roseville is within the SACOG region (Sacramento Area Council of Governments) 6th-cycle planning period 2021-05-15 to 2029-05-15. Roseville adopted its 6th-cycle Housing Element on 2021-11-17 per HCD adopted-letter record. However, HCD's 2024-08-14 Letter of Inquiry regarding rezone-program completion indicates compliance status remained subject to follow-up. Without the current HCD compliance_status finding (in / out / enforcement out) and the most recent APR-based determination, the precise SB 423 tier (exempt / 10% / 50%) cannot be confirmed. Numeric inputs: Roseville population 156,527 (>10,000 threshold for SB 423 applicability); 6th-cycle SACOG planning period 2021-2029; halfway point October 2024; HCD SMAP Dashboard daily updates began 2025-06-30. SB 423 city tier requires direct HCD lookup of current compliance and SMAP-tier determination. | HCD Housing Element Compliance Report current compliance_status for Roseville and current SB 423 SMAP Dashboard tier (effective 2025-06-30+) not retrieved live for v2 ship — HCD authoritative data hosted in dashboard requiring direct lookup. WebSearch confirmed Roseville has 6th-cycle adopted Housing Element + HCD 2024 rezone-LOI follow-up but does not provide current tier finding. | Title: SB 423 — Streamlined Ministerial Multifamily Approval (extends SB 35, 2024–2036) | Citation: GC §65913.4 (SB 423, 2023; effective 2024-01-01 through 2036-01-01) | Tier: 10%-likely-pending-HCD-confirmation
Effect
Conservative posture: assume Roseville is SUBJECT TO SB 423 at 10% tier (or potentially 50% tier depending on APR performance). If 10% tier: ministerial by-right approval required for qualifying multifamily projects on R3 / RMU / CMU / CBD and qualifying CN / CC / GC / BP / RC commercial sites when project meets ≥10% lower-income rental or ≥10% moderate-income ownership threshold. If 50% tier: ≥50% affordable threshold required. 50%+ affordable projects bypass discretionary design review — but Old Town HD historic preservation design review survives (preservation is statutory, not procedural). Prevailing wage / skilled-and-trained workforce requirements apply for 10+ unit projects. /FW Floodway-overlay parcels and Old Town HD CEQA-adopted parcels are excluded. Final tier confirmation requires HCD SMAP Dashboard lookup.
CA-AB2011-GC§65912.100applies
Qualifying condition
Roseville has commercially-zoned parcels along defined corridors (Douglas Blvd, Sunrise Ave, Atlantic St, Foothills Blvd, Vernon St, Riverside Ave, Roseville Pkwy, Eureka Rd) that qualify as 'commercial corridors' under AB 2011. NC (Neighborhood Commercial), CC (Community Commercial), GC (General Commercial), HC (Highway Commercial), CMU (Commercial Mixed Use) base zones along these corridors are AB 2011 candidates. RC (Regional Commercial — Galleria mall) and BP (Business Professional — office-only) typically excluded by use restriction. | Title: AB 2011 — Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act | Citation: GC §65912.100 et seq. (AB 2011, 2022; effective 2023-07-01)
Effect
Ministerial approval for qualifying multifamily on NC, CC, GC, HC, CMU corridor-frontage sites. 100% affordable bypasses discretionary review on any commercial site. 100% affordable bypasses Title 19 discretionary review — but Old Town HD historic design review survives (preservation is statutory). Minimum density cannot be less than Roseville's default density for the area. Overlaps with SB 423 — developers choose pathway. Prevailing wage required. BP office-only zones and M1/M2/MMU industrial-only zones excluded. Verify base zoning per parcel.
CA-BuildersRemedy-GC§65589.5(d)(5)applies
Qualifying condition
Roseville adopted its 6th-cycle Housing Element on 2021-11-17 (SACOG planning period 2021-05-15 to 2029-05-15). HCD informal review letter dated 2020-12-18; adopted version submitted 2021-11-17. HCD 2024-08-14 Letter of Inquiry regarding rezone-program completion implies compliance status was subject to follow-up. WITHOUT current HCD compliance_status finding (compliance_status=In versus =Out versus =Enforcement Out), Builder's Remedy availability is uncertain. Conservative posture: if HCD has not issued a current substantial-compliance finding (compliance_status=In) or if Roseville has fallen out of compliance via APR performance, Builder's Remedy under GC §65589.5(d)(5) is theoretically available for ≥20%-affordable projects on any site. Status requires per-project confirmation via HCD Housing Element Compliance Report. | HCD Housing Element Compliance Report current compliance_status for Roseville not retrieved live for v2 ship — authoritative HCD data hosted on hcd.ca.gov requires direct lookup. WebSearch confirmed Roseville has 6th-cycle adopted Housing Element + HCD 2024 rezone-LOI follow-up but does not provide current compliance_status determination. | Title: Builder's Remedy (Housing Accountability Act) | Citation: GC §65589.5(d)(5); AB 1893 (2024)
Effect
If Builder's Remedy is currently active: projects with ≥20% affordable (low income) bypass all local zoning — height, density, FAR, use restrictions — on any site citywide. City can only deny based on health/safety findings supported by preponderance of evidence. AB 1893 (2024) added procedural requirements. If Builder's Remedy is dormant (compliance_status=In): all projects proceed under standard approval process with state density bonus (§65915), streamlining laws (SB 423 if subject, AB 2011), and ministerial ADU/SB 9 authorizations available.
Non-applicable laws (1)
CA-SB10does_not_apply
Qualifying condition
SB 10 is permissive — it authorizes but does not require cities to zone up to 10 units/parcel near transit or urban infill via simple resolution (CEQA-exempt). No evidence Roseville has adopted an SB 10 resolution; Title 19 + Council ordinance history contain no SB 10-adoption reference. Roseville's downtown / Old Town RMU and CBD zoning + 20+ adopted Specific Plans proceeded through standard CEQA-reviewed processes, not SB 10. | Title: SB 10 — Local Upzoning Authorization | Citation: GC §65913.5 (SB 10, 2021) | Reason: No SB 10 resolution adopted by Roseville City Council per ordinance-history review; SB 10 is permissive opt-in.
Effect
None unless/until Roseville adopts an SB 10 resolution. Downtown / Old Town zoning + Specific Plans were adopted via standard CEQA-reviewed rezone/specific-plan processes.

Adopted building codes

Statewide mandatory minimum

IBC
2024 CBC
IRC
2024 CRC
NEC
2023
IFC
2024
IECC (Residential)
2024 CALGreen
IECC (Commercial)
2024 CALGreen

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Amendment history

DateKindCitation
2025-12-31supplement effective
1996-07-26adoption

Quirks & notes

  • Roseville is the largest city in Placer County (population ~156,527 in 2025; growing ~2.2% annually) and the principal employment / retail center for the South Placer subregion. Westfield Galleria at Roseville (RC zone) is one of the largest regional malls in Northern California. Roseville Auto Mall is a regional auto-retail concentration.
  • Capitol Corridor passenger rail at Roseville Station (201 Pacific Street, Old Town) is the dominant AB 2097 trigger. Multiple weekday round-trips on the Auburn-Sacramento-Oakland-San Jose corridor. The 0.5 mi station buffer overlaps the entire CBD + Old Town HD overlay + adjacent RMU / CMU / GC corridor parcels. SacRT light rail does NOT yet reach Roseville (Green Line extension future); local bus headways generally below AB 2097 15-min threshold.
  • 20+ adopted Specific Plans dominate development pattern: Amoruso Ranch, Atlantic Street Corridor, Creekview, Del Webb (Sun City Roseville), Downtown, Highland Reserve North, North Central Roseville, North Roseville, Northeast Roseville, Northwest Roseville, Riverside Gateway, Sierra Vista, Southeast Roseville, Stoneridge, West Roseville. Implementation via /SA Special Area combining overlay (§19.18.030) which can modify both use types AND dimensional standards by reference to Specific Plan. /SA is the primary tailored-zoning mechanism.
  • RMU (Residential Mixed Use) is a base district with its dimensional standards explicitly delegated to /DS or /SA overlay per §19.10.030 footnote (7): 'None — as provided in development standard overlay or special area overlay district.' Practically a 'mixed-use shell' filled in by Specific Plan or design-standards overlay rather than a fixed-dimension zone.
  • Four-creek SFHA system: /FW Floodway and /FF Floodway Fringe overlays apply along Dry Creek, Linda Creek, Cirby Creek, and Antelope Creek per Official Floodplain Maps (October 1973) + FEMA FIRM panels. Creeks generally run east-west through central Roseville. /FW excludes residential; /FF permits residential with flood-proofing per NFIP. Both trigger §65852.21 SB 9 per-parcel exclusion.
  • Placer County ALUC jurisdiction: Roseville is within the Placer County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan area (2021-09-22 update). Lincoln Regional Airport (KLHM) is ~10 mi NW; Auburn Municipal Airport (KAUN) is ~20 mi NE. Northern Roseville is the primary at-risk area for Lincoln Regional approach corridor noise / safety overlap. FAA Part 77 (14 CFR Part 77) imaginary surfaces are FEDERAL preemption distinct from CA state preemption (FM-P federal_state_conflict).
  • Old Town HD (historic district) overlay covers the original commercial core (Vernon St, Pacific St, Atlantic St) including parcels surrounding Roseville Station. Triple-overlap with CBD base district + AB 2097 buffer + Capitol Corridor service. State density bonus / SB 423 design-review-bypass do not override historic design review (preservation is statutory).
  • No coastal zone, no BCDC jurisdiction (Roseville is ~110 mi inland in the Sacramento Valley). CalFire fire hazard severity zones within city limits are predominantly 'moderate'; concentrated VHFHSZ is east of city in Placer County foothills (outside Roseville jurisdiction). SB 9 fire-zone exclusion has limited impact within Roseville.
  • v1 fabrication flagged (pre-v2 cleanup): prior v1 profile had 11 districts (R-1, R-S, R-2, R-3, BP, NC, GC, CC, MP, M1, M2) all carrying identical fabricated dimensional values (5,000 sf / 35 ft / 0.5 coverage / 0.5 FAR / 2 parking / 25 ft front / 25 ft side / 10 ft rear). This is a v1-converter template-bleed artifact (FM template-bleed pattern). v2 replaces with 21 districts from §19.06.010 authoritative city handout (R1, RS, R2, R3, RMU, BP, NC, CC, GC, HC, RC, CBD, CMU, HD, MP, M1, M2, MMU, OS, PR, P/QP, UR) and confirmed §19.10.030 dimensional values for the 5 residential districts (R1, RS, R2, R3, RMU). Commercial (Ch. 19.12) and industrial (Ch. 19.14) dimensional tables carry NULL values with partial status pending live retrieval (NOT fabricated). Generic v1 overlays (Old Town Historic, Design Standards, Floodway, Floodway Fringe, Planned Development, Special Area, Residential Mixed Use) replaced with Roseville-specific overlay records grounded in §19.06.010 + §19.18.030 source language plus Placer County ALUC federal-overlay refs.

Formulas

Definitions

height
Measured from finished grade to highest structural point per Title 19. Architectural features, mechanical equipment, chimneys, vents, and other architectural/mechanical appurtenances may exceed by up to 15% per §19.10.030(C).
lot_coverage
Primary building footprint / lot area. R1: 35% for 2-story, 45% for 1-story (§19.10.030 Table). R3: 50%.
far
Gross Floor Area / lot area (commercial/industrial districts). Title 19 generally controls via lot coverage + height rather than explicit FAR for residential.
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross developable acre per General Plan land use designation (LDR 0.5-6.9; MDR 7.0-12.9; HDR ≥13.0).
setback_front
Front property line to nearest building face. R1: 20 ft interior / 15 ft corner; RS attached-sidewalk: 15 ft living, 12.5 ft porch; RS separated-sidewalk: 10 ft 1st-floor, 15 ft 2nd-floor (§19.10.030).
setback_side
Side property line to nearest building face. R1: 5 ft interior, 15 ft street side on corner. R3: 5 ft interior, 20 ft on street frontages.
setback_rear
Rear property line to nearest building face. R1: 20% of lot depth (not exceeding 20 ft, 10 ft min); RS: 10 ft min with usable open space provisions; R3: 20 ft.
parking
Per Title 19 Chapter 19.30 / 19.32 off-street parking standards; AB 2097 eliminates within 0.5 mi of Roseville Station (Capitol Corridor major transit stop).
density_bonus
CA Gov Code §65915: 5-15% affordable unlocks 20-50% bonus above base; AB 1287 (2023) stacks to 100%. Parking reduction via §65915(p) preempts local on affordable components.

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far (where FAR specified)
buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2
buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft
max_units_from_density
lot_area_sf * du_ac / 43560
density_bonus_max_du_ac
base_du_ac * 1.5 to 2.0 (§65915 + AB 1287 stacking)

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

—
—
Sort by —
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
◄
prev
►
next
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Primary source
Roseville Municipal Code Title 19 — Zoning
Title 19 Ord. #3014 (1996); rolling supplements through 2025 · retrieved 2026-05-18
Citations
  1. [1] §19.10.030 — 20 ft for interior lots; 15 ft for corner lots; 20 ft minimum driveway depth.
  2. [2] §19.10.030 — 5 ft interior; 15 ft street side on corner.
  3. [3] §19.10.030 — 20% of lot depth, need not exceed 20 ft; 10 ft minimum.
  4. [4] §19.10.030 — R1 interior lot minimum 6,000 sf; corner lot 7,500 sf. Quoted from §19.10.030 Residential Zone General Development Standards table.
  5. [5] §19.10.030 — Height limit 35 ft per §19.10.030 R1 column.
  6. [6] §19.10.030 — R1: 35% for 2-story buildings; 45% for 1-story buildings per §19.10.030 Lot Coverage row. v=0.45 (1-story max); 2-story is 0.35.
  7. [7] General Plan LDR — R1 generally implements LDR (Low Density Residential, 0.5-6.9 du/ac per gross developable acre) General Plan designation; max ~6.9 du/ac on small lots.
  8. [8] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — 2 spaces/unit typical R1; AB 2097 eliminates within 0.5 mi Roseville Station (Capitol Corridor major transit stop). §19.10.030 footnote (1): up to 2 residential units permitted; SB 9 (GC §65852.21) adds up to 4 units total. §19.10.030 footnote (11): up to 2 ADU/JADU via Ch. 19.60.
  9. [9] §19.10.030 — RS attached-sidewalk: 15 ft to living space or side wall of garage; 12.5 ft to porch; 18 ft minimum driveway depth (with roll-up garage door per footnote 6). RS separated-sidewalk: 10 ft to first-floor living, 7.5 ft to porch (not into PUE), 15 ft to second-floor.
  10. [10] §19.10.030 — 5 ft interior; 12.5 ft street-side first floor + 15 ft second floor (attached sidewalk); 10 ft first / 13 ft second floor (separated sidewalk).
  11. [11] §19.10.030 — 10 ft minimum with minimum useable open space of 700 sf (500 sf where usable front porch provided per footnote 4).
  12. [12] §19.10.030 — RS with attached sidewalk: 4,500 sf interior; 5,500 sf corner. RS with separated sidewalk (5-ft planter, footnote 8): 4,275 sf interior; 4,710 sf corner — the smaller minimum used here for the more permissive case.
  13. [13] §19.10.030 — Height limit 35 ft per §19.10.030 RS column.
  14. [14] General Plan LDR/MDR border — RS small-lot single-family typically implements LDR upper-end (6.9 du/ac) to MDR (7-12.9 du/ac) General Plan designations. Lot-size derived ~9 du/ac on 4,275 sf lots with circulation.
  15. [15] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — 2 spaces/unit typical; AB 2097 eliminates within 0.5 mi Roseville Station. §19.10.030 footnote (1): up to 2 units; SB 9 adds up to 4. Footnote (11): up to 2 ADU/JADU via Ch. 19.60.
  16. [16] §19.10.030 — 20 ft for interior lots; 15 ft for corner lots; 20 ft minimum driveway depth.
  17. [17] §19.10.030 — 5 ft interior; 15 ft street side on corner.
  18. [18] §19.10.030 — 20% of lot depth, need not exceed 20 ft; 10 ft minimum.
  19. [19] §19.10.030 — R2 interior 6,000 sf; corner 7,500 sf.
  20. [20] §19.10.030 — Height limit 35 ft per §19.10.030 R2 column.
  21. [21] §19.10.030 — R2 lot coverage 40% per §19.10.030.
  22. [22] General Plan MDR — R2 implements MDR (Medium Density Residential, 7.0-12.9 du/ac) General Plan designation; effectively up to ~12.9 du/ac.
  23. [23] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — 2 spaces/unit typical R2; AB 2097 eliminates within 0.5 mi Roseville Station. R2 permits 2 dwellings per lot (§19.10.030 footnote 1) — duplex or two detached. SB 9 adds up to 4 units total. Up to 2 ADU/JADU via Ch. 19.60.
  24. [24] §19.10.030 — 20 ft minimum on all street frontages.
  25. [25] §19.10.030 — 5 ft interior; 20 ft minimum on all street frontages.
  26. [26] §19.10.030 — 20 ft; 20 ft minimum on all street frontages.
  27. [27] §19.10.030 — R3 interior 6,000 sf; corner 7,500 sf minimum lot.
  28. [28] §19.10.030 footnote (5) — Height limit 45 ft per §19.10.030 R3 column. Footnote (5): 'Except for residential units immediately adjacent to the R1 and RS zone districts, where the height limit shall be 35 feet.' Step-down adjacency rule reduces height to 35 ft adjacent to R1/RS.
  29. [29] §19.10.030 — R3 lot coverage 50% per §19.10.030.
  30. [30] General Plan HDR — R3 implements HDR (High Density Residential, ≥13.0 du/ac) General Plan designation. §19.10.030 sets minimum density 'As provided by General Plan, but a minimum of 3 dwellings' per lot — no fixed du/ac cap in base table. Min 3 dwellings/lot distinguishes R3 (MF) from R2 (two-family).
  31. [31] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — 1.5 sp/unit typical multifamily; AB 2097 eliminates within 0.5 mi Roseville Station. Up to 2 ADU/JADU per lot; SB 1211 (2025) extends to 8 ADUs on qualifying MF lots.
  32. [32] §19.10.030 footnote (7) — Setbacks governed by overlay/Specific Plan.
  33. [33] §19.10.030 footnote (7) — Setbacks governed by overlay/Specific Plan.
  34. [34] §19.10.030 footnote (7) — Setbacks governed by overlay/Specific Plan.
  35. [35] §19.10.030 footnote (7) — RMU per §19.10.030 table: 'None — as provided in development standard overlay or special area overlay district.' RMU dimensional standards come from /DS overlay or /SA Specific Plan covering parcel.
  36. [36] §19.10.030 footnote (7) — Height limit governed by /DS or /SA overlay rather than base table.
  37. [37] §19.10.030 footnote (7) — Lot coverage governed by overlay/Specific Plan.
  38. [38] §19.10.030 RMU — Residential density 'As provided by General Plan' per §19.10.030 — depends on parcel's General Plan designation.
  39. [39] GC§65863.2 / overlay — AB 2097 eliminates minimum parking within 0.5 mi Roseville Station (Capitol Corridor). RMU corridor parcels typically within this buffer.
  40. [40] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  41. [41] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  42. [42] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  43. [43] §19.12.030 — BP commercial-zone development standards in Ch. 19.12; exact minimum lot pending live retrieval.
  44. [44] §19.12.030 — BP height limit per §19.12.030 table; not retrieved live.
  45. [45] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  46. [46] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  47. [47] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Office parking ratio typical 1/300 sf; AB 2097 eliminates within 0.5 mi Roseville Station.
  48. [48] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  49. [49] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  50. [50] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  51. [51] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  52. [52] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  53. [53] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  54. [54] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  55. [55] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Retail/personal-service ratio typical 1/300 sf; AB 2097 eliminates within 0.5 mi Roseville Station.
  56. [56] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  57. [57] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  58. [58] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  59. [59] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  60. [60] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  61. [61] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  62. [62] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  63. [63] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Retail ratio typical 1/250-1/300 sf; AB 2097 buffer applies for parcels near Roseville Station.
  64. [64] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  65. [65] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  66. [66] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  67. [67] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  68. [68] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  69. [69] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  70. [70] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  71. [71] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Service-commercial ratio per Ch. 19.30/19.32.
  72. [72] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  73. [73] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  74. [74] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  75. [75] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  76. [76] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  77. [77] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  78. [78] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  79. [79] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Highway-commercial parking per Ch. 19.30/19.32.
  80. [80] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  81. [81] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  82. [82] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  83. [83] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  84. [84] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  85. [85] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  86. [86] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  87. [87] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Regional-mall parking typically high-volume; AB 2097 buffer may apply to portions near Roseville Station / rail corridor.
  88. [88] Downtown SP — Downtown setbacks per Specific Plan.
  89. [89] Downtown SP — Downtown setbacks per Specific Plan.
  90. [90] Downtown SP — Downtown setbacks per Specific Plan.
  91. [91] §19.12.030 + Downtown SP — CBD dimensional standards in §19.12.030 + Downtown Specific Plan; not retrieved live.
  92. [92] Downtown SP — CBD/Downtown height tiered per Downtown Specific Plan; not retrieved live.
  93. [93] §19.12.030 + Downtown SP — Pending §19.12.030 + Downtown SP retrieval.
  94. [94] Downtown SP — Downtown FAR per Specific Plan; not retrieved live.
  95. [95] Downtown SP — Downtown density per Specific Plan.
  96. [96] GC§65863.2 — AB 2097 eliminates minimum parking within 0.5 mi Roseville Station — CBD/Downtown overlaps station buffer entirely.
  97. [97] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  98. [98] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  99. [99] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  100. [100] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  101. [101] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  102. [102] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  103. [103] §19.12.030 — Pending §19.12.030 retrieval.
  104. [104] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — AB 2097 buffer applies for CMU parcels near Roseville Station.
  105. [105] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  106. [106] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  107. [107] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  108. [108] §19.14.030 — MP industrial-zone development standards in Ch. 19.14; exact minimum lot pending live retrieval.
  109. [109] §19.14.030 — MP height limit per §19.14.030; not retrieved live.
  110. [110] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  111. [111] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  112. [112] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Office-industrial mixed parking ratio per Ch. 19.30/19.32.
  113. [113] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  114. [114] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  115. [115] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  116. [116] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  117. [117] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  118. [118] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  119. [119] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  120. [120] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Light-industrial parking ratio per Ch. 19.30/19.32.
  121. [121] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  122. [122] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  123. [123] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  124. [124] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  125. [125] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  126. [126] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  127. [127] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  128. [128] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Heavy-industrial parking ratio per Ch. 19.30/19.32.
  129. [129] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  130. [130] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  131. [131] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  132. [132] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  133. [133] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  134. [134] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  135. [135] §19.14.030 — Pending §19.14.030 retrieval.
  136. [136] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Mixed-industrial parking per Ch. 19.30/19.32.
  137. [137] §19.16 — OS height per Ch. 19.16 special-purpose zones; typically low (25-35 ft accessory).
  138. [138] §19.16 — OS very low coverage (typical 5-10%) for trails, picnic structures.
  139. [139] §19.16 — PR height per Ch. 19.16; community-building / pavilion typical 25-45 ft.
  140. [140] §19.16 — PR moderate coverage for community buildings, recreation facilities.
  141. [141] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Park parking per use-specific ratios.
  142. [142] §19.16 — P/QP height per Ch. 19.16; civic uses typical 35-55 ft.
  143. [143] §19.16 — P/QP coverage per Ch. 19.16.
  144. [144] Ch. 19.30/19.32 — Use-specific ratios.
  145. [145] §19.16 UR — Urban Reserve typical large-lot (20+ ac) interim designation pending Specific Plan adoption.
  146. [146] §19.16 UR — UR interim agricultural/rural standards.
  147. [147] §19.16 UR — UR typical 1 du / 10-20 ac interim density pending Specific Plan / annexation.
  148. [148] §19.06.010 HD
  149. [149] §19.06.010 HD
  150. [150] §19.06.010 HD
  151. [151] §19.06.010 HD
  152. [152] GC§65852.21
  153. [153] GC§65863.2
  154. [154] §19.06.010 /DS
  155. [155] §19.06.010 /DS
  156. [156] §19.06.010 /DS
  157. [157] §19.06.010 /DS
  158. [158] GC§65913.4
  159. [159] §19.06.010 /FW + Title 16 floodplain
  160. [160] §19.06.010 /FW
  161. [161] §19.06.010 /FW
  162. [162] NFIP standard
  163. [163] §19.06.010 /FW
  164. [164] GC§65852.21
  165. [165] §19.06.010 /FF
  166. [166] NFIP standard
  167. [167] §19.06.010 /FF
  168. [168] NFIP standard
  169. [169] §19.06.010 /FF
  170. [170] GC§65852.21
  171. [171] §19.06.010 PD
  172. [172] §19.06.010 PD
  173. [173] §19.06.010 PD vs /SA
  174. [174] GC§65913.4 + GC§65915
  175. [175] §19.06.010 PD
  176. [176] §19.18.030
  177. [177] §19.18.030
  178. [178] §19.18.030
  179. [179] §19.18.030
  180. [180] GC§65913.4 + GC§65915
  181. [181] §19.10.030 RMU
  182. [182] §19.10.030 footnote (7)
  183. [183] §19.10.030 footnote (7)
  184. [184] §19.10.030 footnote (7)
  185. [185] RMU practice
  186. [186] GC§65863.2
  187. [187] Placer ALUCP
  188. [188] Placer ALUCP
  189. [189] 14 CFR Part 77
  190. [190] Placer ALUCP
  191. [191] FAA Part 77
  192. [192] Placer ALUCP

Research status

Publication gates

primary url presentpassedsource.primary_url = https://ecode360.com/RO5085 (Roseville Title 19); ecode360.com is Roseville's authoritative codification platform (not a forbidden aggregator — distinct from Zoneomics/Steadily/SitePlanGuide/SitePlanCreator). Fallback: library.qcode.us legacy mirror. City Planning page fallback: roseville.ca.gov/development_services/planning/zoning.php.
no aggregator citedpassedRecord scan found no Zoneomics/Steadily/SitePlanGuide/SitePlanCreator/Propwire/Zonara/Unzoned references. All citations point to RMC Title 19 §-references (§19.06.010, §19.10.030, §19.18.030), CA Government Code (§66411.7, §65852.21, §65915, §65863.2, §65913.4, §65912.100, §65589.5), 14 CFR Part 77 (federal), Placer County ALUCP, City of Roseville handout PDF, or library.qcode.us / ecode360.com / roseville.ca.gov URLs.
confidence tags full formpassedAll confirmed claims carry c form with §-reference (e.g., c §19.10.030 for residential standards, c §19.18.030 for /SA overlay, c GC§65915 for density bonus, c GC§65852.21 for SB 9, c GC§65863.2 for AB 2097). Partial claims carry p §19.12.030 / p §19.14.030 / p §19.16 / p Downtown SP / p Placer ALUCP. Under-review claims (SB 423 tier, Builder's Remedy) carry explicit retrieval_failure_reason + qualifying_condition_checked narratives. No bare confidence tags without §-reference. 21 districts + 9 overlays + 8 preemption entries all carry §-citations.
overlays have parameters trigger confidencepassed9/9 overlays (Old Town HD, /DS Design Standards, /FW Floodway, /FF Floodway Fringe, PD Planned Development, /SA Special Area, RMU Residential Mixed Use, Placer ALUC Airport Influence with federal_overlay_refs) have non-empty parameters object (≥5 keys each), explicit geographic_trigger string, status, citation, source_jurisdiction=roseville-ca, confidence, search_performed, retrieval_failure_reason narratives. Placer ALUC overlay correctly flags FAA Part 77 as FEDERAL preemption distinct from state SB 9/AB 2097 (FM-P federal_state_conflict discipline).
preempt section city specificpassedstate_preemptions_applicable[] has 8 per-law CA entries (ADU, SB 9, Density Bonus + AB 1287, AB 2097, SB 423, AB 2011, Builder's Remedy, SB 10). Each has qualifying_condition_checked narrative specific to Roseville (Capitol Corridor Roseville Station as AB 2097 trigger; four-creek SFHA system for SB 9 exclusion; SACOG 6th-cycle 2021-2029 planning period; Roseville population 156,527; Placer County population 423,970; Old Town HD CEQA-adoption caveat; Specific-Plan / /SA implementation across 20+ adopted plans) and effect_on_city statement. 6 confirmed applies=true, 2 under_review (SB 423 tier + Builder's Remedy — both carrying retrieval_failure_reason for HCD Dashboard lookup), 1 not_applicable (SB 10 opt-in not adopted). No link-stub.

Data quality

55%completeness7 confirmed50 partial2 inferred
Documented gaps
  • Complete Ch. 19.12 commercial dimensional standards tables (BP, NC, CC, GC, HC, RC, CBD, CMU) not retrieved live — values NULL with partial status pending browser retrieval of eCode360 (Cloudflare-gated)
  • Complete Ch. 19.14 industrial dimensional standards tables (MP, M1, M2, MMU) not retrieved live — values NULL with partial status pending browser retrieval
  • Ch. 19.16 special-purpose zones (OS, PR, P/QP, UR) detailed standards not retrieved live
  • Ch. 19.18 PD + /SA overlay full chapter text not retrieved live (definitional sentence extracted)
  • Ch. 19.60 ADU/JADU detailed standards (size limits, parking, lot-size minima) not retrieved live
  • Downtown Specific Plan exact dimensional tiers (height, FAR, density) not retrieved live
  • 20+ Specific Plan implementing parameters (Amoruso Ranch, Highland Reserve North, North Central Roseville, etc.) not retrieved per-plan
  • HCD current compliance_status for Roseville and current SB 423 SMAP-Dashboard tier (effective 2025-06-30+) not retrieved live — pending HCD dashboard lookup
  • HCD current Builder's Remedy applicability determination pending current compliance_status finding
  • Placer County ALUCP exact CNEL contour geometry overlap with Roseville city limits (Lincoln Regional approach corridor) pending PCTPA document retrieval
  • Old Town HD district CEQA-adoption status per-designation pending Title 19 HD chapter retrieval (determines §65852.21(a)(2)(D) SB 9 exclusion applicability)
  • Title 19 §19.06.020 (zoning map) parcel-level mapping pending zoning-map PDF retrieval and cross-reference
  • SUMMARY: Contact City of Roseville Planning Division (Development Services) for production-level accuracy. Priority browser-based retrieval: Ch. 19.12/19.14/19.16/19.18/19.60 chapter text, Downtown Specific Plan, HCD current compliance_status + SB 423 SMAP tier, Placer County ALUCP CNEL contour mapping.

Known issues

cohort:needs-dom-retrievalfreshness:volatileblocker:ecode360-cloudflaredata:gaps-present

Verification

last_verified_at2026-05-18T00:00:00Z
verifier_specialistpublication-validator
verifier_version1.0
verification_resultpassed
atomic_claims_checked38
atomic_claims_passed38
atomic_claims_failed0
failed_claims
narrative_refnarratives/roseville-ca/drain-20260518T072625-ca-01.json

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.

AnaheimCoronaFresnoIrvineMoreno ValleyOxnardRedondo BeachSan Jose