Military Installation Influence — Fort Leonard Wood + Whiteman AFB AICUZ / Encroachment Coordination (MO)
Tracked preemption from the Missouri overlay bundle.
Overview
← All state preemptionsMissouri overlay roll-upMissouri zoning wikiMissouri building codesFederal overlaysGlossaryFederal-conflict: Yes
Effective
1973-01-01
Sunset
—
Authority
state
Scope
state:MO
Other Missouri preemptions
RSMo §89.020.2 — Manufactured-Home Appearance-Criteria Preemption (Permissive-Enabling)RSMo §§ 447.700–447.718 — Missouri Brownfield Redevelopment ProgramMissouri CAFO Regulation — 10 CSR 20-6.300 (MDNR Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations)RSMo §§ 99.800–99.865 — Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment ActRSMo §§ 305.400–305.410 — Greene County Airport Zoning Law (Springfield-Branson Region)RSMo § 253.408 — Missouri State Historic Preservation Act (SHPO)Mark Twain National Forest — USFS Adjacency & Land-Use Coordination OverlayMissouri Floodplain Management — SEMA NFIP Coordination + MDNR 10 CSR 20-8
Trigger predicate
When this evaluates true for a parcel, the law's preempted fields take precedence over base zoning.
OR
city.military_installation_adjacency==fort_leonard_woodcity.military_installation_adjacency==whiteman_afb
Preempted fields
2 fields on the base district schema are rewritten when the trigger fires.
| Field | Op | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
review_type | require | AICUZ_or_REPI_compatible_use_review | Department of Defense Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) and Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration (REPI) programs identify Accident Potential Zones (APZ-I, APZ-II, Clear Zone) and noise contours (DNL 65–85+ dB) around military installations. DoD recommends compatible land uses; state and local adoption is voluntary but DoD comments on rezonings within the influence area are formal. |
base_districts[*].military_compatible_use_findings | advisory | consult_AICUZ_or_JLUS_recommendations | Missouri has no state-mandated military-compatibility overlay analogous to Texas LGC §397 (Joint Land Use Study compliance). Local adoption of JLUS recommendations is voluntary at Pulaski County (29169) for Fort Leonard Wood and Johnson County (29101) for Whiteman AFB. |
Citation
Authority source
DoD Instruction 4165.57 (Air Installations Compatible Use Zones); 10 U.S.C. §2391 (Joint Land Use Study); 10 U.S.C. §2684a (REPI Program). State: Mo. Rev. Stat. §305.400 et seq. (Greene County / Springfield airport zoning, by analogy — see MO_GREENE_COUNTY_AIRPORT below)
§ DoDI 4165.57; 10 U.S.C. §§2391, 2684a
Research notes
Fort Leonard Wood (~63,000 acres in Pulaski County, U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center of Excellence) and Whiteman AFB (~3,400 acres in Johnson County, B-2 Spirit base) are the two major MO military installations with active AICUZ programs. Missouri does not require local AICUZ adoption — preemption is advisory + federal NEPA consultation for federal undertakings. The pattern parallels Indiana's IN_8_21_10 tall-structures overlay but Missouri lacks an analogous statewide airport-hazard preemption statute; airport zoning is regionally fragmented (Greene County §§305.400–305.410; St. Louis Metro Airport Authority §§305.575–305.580). preemptions.md does not address military influence — overlay authored from DoD AICUZ / REPI source data.