Zoning › California › Alameda County › Oakland

Oakland, CA Zoning

Euclidean-zoning. 22 districts · 7 overlays · 8 applicable state preemptions.

Overview

Code type
euclidean
Naming convention
mixed

Base districts use letter-code + numeric tier (RH-1..4 hillside, RD-1..4 detached, RM-1..4 mixed housing, RU-1..4 urban residential, CC-1..3 community commercial, M-20/30/40 industrial). Combining / overlay districts use 'S-' prefix (S-7 historic district, S-13 affordable housing, S-14 housing sites, S-20 individual landmarks). RM density is encoded as lot-area-per-unit (sf/unit), not du/ac cap. | naming_convention_raw=letter-code + numeric tier (RH/RD/RM/RU/CC/M) with S-prefix combining overlays (S-7/S-13/S-14/S-20) ; sub_flags_raw=[transit-heavy, historic-overlay-decomposed, active-gpu-rewrite, housing-element-under-review]

Worth knowing
  • Decomposed Historic Preservation overlay: S-7 (district-scale, 9 designated districts, ~1,500 contributing buildings) and S-20 (parcel-scale individual landmarks, ~135 properties) are DISTINCT overlays with different geographic triggers and different SB 9 / CEQA implications. v1 conflated them. [confirmed §17.84]
  • S-13 by-right 100%-affordable — effective 2024-12-19 per Zoning Code Bulletin. Unlimited density for 100%-affordable meeting objective design standards. Stacks with state DBL but S-13 itself is not stackable with local density bonus. [confirmed §17.95]
  • RM lot-area-per-unit density method (not du/ac cap). RM-1: 1,650 sf/unit; RM-2: 1,400; RM-3: 1,200; RM-4: 1,100. [confirmed §17.17.050]

+ 8 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

res_sf 8res_mf 8com 3ind 3
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
RH-1Hillside Residential 1res_sf43,560 sf[1]35 ft[2]——1[3]—— / — / —
RH-2Hillside Residential 2res_sf21,780 sf[4]35 ft[5]——1[6]—— / — / —
RH-3Hillside Residential 3res_sf10,890 sf[7]35 ft[8]——1[9]—— / — / —
RH-4Hillside Residential 4res_sf6,500 sf[10]35 ft[11]——1[12]—— / — / —
RD-1Detached Residential 1res_sf6,500 sf[13]35 ft[14]————— / — / —
RD-2Detached Residential 2res_sf5,000 sf[15]35 ft[16]————— / — / —
RD-3Detached Residential 3res_sf4,000 sf[17]35 ft[18]————— / — / —
RD-4Detached Residential 4res_sf2,500 sf[19]35 ft[20]————— / — / —
RM-1Mixed Housing 1res_mf5,000 sf[21]45 ft[22]———[23]—— / — / —
RM-2Mixed Housing 2res_mf4,000 sf[24]50 ft[25]———[26]—— / — / —
RM-3Mixed Housing 3res_mf3,000 sf[27]55 ft[28]———[29]—— / — / —
RM-4Mixed Housing 4res_mf2,500 sf[30]60 ft[31]———[32]—— / — / —
RU-1Urban Residential 1res_mf2,500 sf[33]55 ft[34]————— / — / —
RU-2Urban Residential 2res_mf2,000 sf[35]65 ft[36]————— / — / —
RU-3Urban Residential 3res_mf1,500 sf[37]80 ft[38]————— / — / —
RU-4Urban Residential 4res_mf1,000 sf[39]100 ft[40]————— / — / —
CC-1Community Commercial 1com—55 ft[41]————— / — / —
CC-2Community Commercial 2com—65 ft[42]————— / — / —
CC-3Community Commercial 3com—75 ft[43]————— / — / —
M-20Light Industrialind——————— / — / —
M-30General Industrialind——————— / — / —
M-40Heavy Industrialind——————— / — / —

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

S-7
Preservation Combining Zone — Historic District
HP
OPC §17.84

Properties within one of Oakland's 9 locally-designated historic districts (Oakland Designated Historic Properties list). ~1,500 contributing buildings across all S-7 districts combined.

review_authorityLandmarks Preservation Advisory Board (LPAB)[44]
review_mechanismCertificate of Appropriateness OR Major Alteration Design Review for exterior alterations to contributing structures[45]
rating_systemletter ratings A–E for individual properties; number ratings 1–3 for district tier; contributor/non-contributor status per property[46]
dual_ratings_allowed1[47]
new_construction_standardequal-or-better design quality + compatible with neighborhood character[48]
designated_districts9
contributing_buildings_approx1,500
sb9_exclusion1[49]
S-20
Preservation Combining Zone — Individual Landmarks
HP
OPC §17.84 / §17.136

Individually designated City Landmarks (distinct from S-7 district-wide designations); ~135 individual landmarks recorded by the Oakland Landmarks Preservation program as of 2024.

review_authorityLandmarks Preservation Advisory Board (LPAB)[50]
designation_criteriaper §17.136 landmark criteria (historic, architectural, cultural significance)[51]
review_mechanismCertificate of Appropriateness for exterior alterations; demolition delay / review[52]
scopeindividual parcel / structure (not geographic district)
landmarks_count_approx135
ceqa_historic_resource_review1[53]
sb9_exclusion1[54]
S-13
Affordable Housing Combining Zone
AH
OPC §17.95

Applied site-by-site to parcels hosting 100%-affordable projects meeting objective design standards.

density_bonusunlimited (no maximum DU cap for 100%-affordable)[55]
approval_pathministerial by-right (no CUP, no discretionary design review) where objective design standards met[56]
parking_ratiosstate DBL GC §65915(p) ratios (0.5 studio/1BR, 1.0 2-3BR, 1.5 4+BR)[57]
height_bonus+20 ft minimum, or project-specific waiver under §65915[58]
setback_waiveravailable as §65915 concession[59]
stacking_restrictionS-13 cannot be combined with local discretionary density bonus — 100%-affordable projects use S-13 OR GC §65915, not both[60]
effective_date2024-12-19[61]
S-14
Housing Sites Combining Zone
spec
OPC §17.96

Parcels identified on the City's Housing Sites Inventory under the 2023–2031 Housing Element (~2,600+ sites). May combine with residential, commercial, or industrial base.

inventory_source2023–2031 Housing Element Housing Sites Inventory[62]
base_zone_compatibilityany (residential, commercial, industrial)[63]
density_bonus_stackingbase zone + state GC §65915 stacking allowed if affordability thresholds met[64]
prior_cycle_sitesspecific sections apply to prior housing-element-cycle sites[65]
residential_facilitationresidential development facilitated with faster approval vs. discretionary[66]
stackable_with_s131
site_count_approx2,600[67]
FP
Floodplain
FP
OPC Title 17 floodplain chapter + FEMA FIRM panels

Properties within FEMA-designated 100-year flood zones along shoreline / Estuary / Jack London / West Oakland frontage per FIRM panels.

permit_requirementFloodplain Development Permit required
elevation_standardsper FEMA base flood elevation + city floodplain ordinance
fema_zone_triggerFIRM Zones A / AE / VE per panel[68]
AP
Airport Approach
MIL
OPC Title 17 + FAA Part 77 surfaces

Properties within Oakland International Airport (OAK) approach zones; FAA Part 77 imaginary surfaces cap base district height on affected parcels.

height_restrictionper FAA Part 77 surfaces (primary, approach, transitional, horizontal, conical)[69]
base_interactionmore restrictive of FAA-imposed height cap or base district cap applies
CZ
Coastal Zone
ENV
CA Coastal Act + CA GC §65913.4 (SB 423, coastal expansion effective 2025-01-01)

Oakland's jurisdictional coastal zone is limited to the Outer Harbor / Estuary / Jack London / San Antonio shoreline strip.

cdp_required1[70]
sb423_streamlining_available1[71]
boundary_descriptionnarrow shoreline strip along Outer Harbor, Estuary, Jack London, San Antonio frontage[72]

State preemptions

CA-ADU-GC§66411.7-66411.8applies
Qualifying condition
Applies to all CA cities unconditionally. Oakland (charter city, pop ~430,553; Alameda County ~1.68M) implements ADUs via OPC Chapter 17.103 (Secondary Units) and §17.03.020 definitions. All RH / RD / RM / RU base districts are ADU-eligible. | title=Accessory Dwelling Units / JADUs (SB 897 + AB 2221; SB 1211)
Effect
Ministerial 60-day shot clock; up to 1,200 sf detached ADU / 500 sf JADU; no owner-occupancy beyond statute; no minimum lot size; no parking required within ½ mi of a major transit stop or within a historic district. SB 1211 (effective 2025-01-01) authorizes up to 8 detached ADUs on qualifying multifamily lots — material to Oakland's RM and RU districts.
CA-SB9-GC§65852.21-66411.7applies
Qualifying condition
Oakland is a CA charter city with RH-1..4 / RD-1..4 single-family-eligible districts. SB 9 applies per-parcel conditional on exclusions. Oakland exclusions with known footprint: (a) CalFire Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone — substantial RH-1/RH-2 hillside parcels overlap VHFHSZ and are excluded, (b) designated historic districts — the 9 S-7 Preservation Districts and individually-landmarked S-20 parcels are excluded, (c) FEMA SFHA — shoreline Jack London / Estuary / West Oakland parcels per FIRM panels, (d) coastal zone — narrow Estuary frontage. | title=SB 9 — California HOME Act (Lot Splits + Duplex Conversion) + SB 450 (2024) ; per_parcel_conditional=True ; exclusions=['CalFire VHFHSZ (hillside RH-1/RH-2 overlap — per-parcel check)', 'designated historic districts (S-7 Preservation Districts, S-20 individual landmarks)', 'FEMA SFHA (Jack London / Estuary / West Oakland shoreline per-parcel)', 'coastal zone (narrow Estuary frontage)']
Effect
Ministerial up-to-4-unit (lot split + duplex on each resulting lot) on qualifying R-zone parcels. Oakland cannot require post-split lot <1,200 sf, side/rear setbacks >4 ft, or FAR below what permits 800 sf per unit. SB 450 (2024, effective 2024-07-01) strengthens procedural limits on local SB 9 ordinances.
CA-DensityBonus-GC§65915applies
Qualifying condition
Applies statewide to any Oakland project meeting affordability thresholds (5% VLI, 10% LI, 10% moderate for-sale, or 100% affordable). AB 1287 allows stacking of two bonuses to reach up to 100% density bonus. Oakland's local companion is the S-13 100%-affordable combining zone at OPC §17.95 (effective 2024-12-19). | title=State Density Bonus Law + AB 1287 (2023)
Effect
Up to 100% density bonus (AB 1287 stacked) on RM-1..4 / RU-1..4 / CC-1..3 / mixed-use residential components; 1–3 concessions/incentives (depending on VLI/LI/moderate percentage) can waive base du_ac / height / setback standards. State §65915(p) parking ratios (0.5 studio/1BR, 1.0 2-3BR, 1.5 4+BR) preempt OPC parking tables on affordable components. For 100%-affordable within ½ mi of a major transit stop, §65915(r) permits +3 stories or +35 ft whichever is greater — material on Oakland BART-adjacent parcels.
CA-AB2097applies
Qualifying condition
Oakland is one of the most transit-dense cities in California. Qualifying 'major transit stops' under PRC §21064.3 include: BART stations (12th St Oakland, 19th St Oakland, Lake Merritt, MacArthur, Rockridge, Ashby, Fruitvale, Coliseum, West Oakland); Amtrak Capitol Corridor / San Joaquins at Jack London Square and Oakland Coliseum; AC Transit Tempo BRT and multiple AC Transit high-frequency (≤15-min peak headway) lines (NL, 1, 6, 51A/B, 57, 72R, 73, 97); San Francisco Bay Ferry at Oakland Ferry Terminal (Jack London Square). Substantially all of Oakland's RU, RM (upper tiers), CC, and downtown mixed-use districts lie within ½ mi of at least one qualifying stop. | title=AB 2097 — Parking Mandate Elimination Near Major Transit Stops
Effect
No minimum parking requirement may be imposed on residential, commercial, or mixed-use projects within ½ mi of any qualifying major transit stop. Preempts OPC parking ratios citywide on the majority of developable parcels. Stacks with SB 9, State Density Bonus, and AB 2011 for eligible parcels.
CA-SB423-GC§65913.4applies
Qualifying condition
SB 423 applies to residential or mixed-use sites in jurisdictions not meeting their 6th-cycle RHNA allocation. Oakland is part of ABAG's 6th-cycle RHNA (2023–2031) with a ~26,251-unit allocation. Oakland's 2023–2031 Housing Element was resubmitted to HCD in early 2023 after initial non-compliance findings; 2026 certification status is under ongoing HCD review. The 10% / 50% affordability trigger depends on HCD's Annual Progress Report SB 35/423 determination. | title=SB 423 — Streamlined Ministerial Multifamily Approval (extends SB 35, 2024–2036) ; effect_if_eligible=If eligible at 10% trigger: ministerial by-right approval for qualifying multifamily ≥10% LI-affordable (rental) or moderate-affordable (for-sale). If eligible at 50%: design review also bypassed. Prevailing wage + skilled-and-trained workforce apply for 10+ unit projects. Applies to RM / RU / CC / downtown mixed-use, including the narrow Estuary coastal-zone frontage (SB 423 coastal expansion effective 2025-01-01). ; preempted_fields_if_eligible=['districts[code=RM-1..4,RU-1..4,CC-1..3].all_discretionary_review (by-right on 10%+ affordable multifamily)']
Retrieval issue
HCD Annual Progress Report / SB 35-423 determination dashboard and Housing Element Compliance dashboard are JS-rendered and were not fetched live within v2 budget. Oakland's specific 10% vs 50% vs exempt determination requires dashboard query at data.ca.gov / HCD APR dashboard at project-submission time.
CA-AB2011-GC§65912.100applies
Qualifying condition
Oakland has extensive qualifying commercial corridors (≥70 ft wide, zoned CC or comparable mixed-use): Broadway, Telegraph Ave, San Pablo Ave, International Blvd, MacArthur Blvd, Foothill Blvd, Grand Ave, Piedmont Ave, Lakeshore Ave, 14th St / Frank Ogawa Plaza downtown. 100%-affordable projects qualify ministerially on any commercial site; mixed-income projects qualify on corridor sites at density not less than 30 du/ac or jurisdiction default (whichever higher). | title=AB 2011 — Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act
Effect
Ministerial approval for qualifying multifamily on CC-1..3 and downtown mixed-use corridor sites. 100%-affordable bypasses discretionary review entirely. Minimum density floor (30 du/ac or default, whichever higher) preempts lower local caps. Prevailing wage required. Overlaps with SB 423 — developers choose pathway.
CA-BuildersRemedy-GC§65589.5(d)(5)applies
Qualifying condition
Oakland is part of the ABAG 6th-cycle RHNA (2023–2031). HCD Housing Element certification status for Oakland is unsettled — initial HCD findings flagged non-compliance; resubmissions ongoing through 2024–2026. Builder's Remedy is live during any period the Housing Element is HCD-non-certified; dormant when certified. AB 1893 (2024) codified procedural requirements (timing, findings, exhaustion). | title=Builder's Remedy (Housing Accountability Act) + AB 1633/1893 ; effect_if_noncertified=Projects with ≥20% LI-affordable or 100% moderate-income bypass all local zoning (height, density, FAR, use, setbacks, design review). Oakland may only deny on preponderance-of-evidence health/safety findings. Applicable to any Title 17 base or overlay district.
Retrieval issue
HCD Housing Element Compliance dashboard is JS-rendered; Oakland's current certification status was not fetched live this pass. Treat as under_review and verify per-project at submission.
CA-CoastalActapplies
Qualifying condition
Oakland's jurisdictional coastal zone is limited to the Outer Harbor / Estuary / Jack London / San Antonio shoreline strip per CA Coastal Commission mapped boundary. | title=California Coastal Act (narrow coastal-zone strip)
Effect
Coastal Development Permit (CDP) required for development within the coastal zone. SB 423 streamlining now extends to qualifying multifamily in the coastal zone (effective 2025-01-01).
Non-applicable laws (1)
CA-SB10under_review
Qualifying condition
SB 10 is permissive — authorizes but does not require cities to upzone to 10 units/parcel near transit or urban infill via simple council resolution (CEQA-exempt). No SB 10 resolution identified in Oakland City Council records or Title 17. Oakland's 2023 GPU Phase 1 small-lot density increase (RD/RM lots <4,000 sf) was adopted via standard Planning Code amendment, not SB 10. | title=SB 10 — Local Upzoning Authorization (permissive)
Effect
None unless/until Oakland Council adopts an SB 10 resolution.

Adopted building codes

Statewide mandatory minimum

IBC
2024 CBC
IRC
2024 CRC
NEC
2023
IFC
2024
IECC (Residential)
2024 CALGreen
IECC (Commercial)
2024 CALGreen

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Quirks & notes

  • Decomposed Historic Preservation overlay: S-7 (district-scale, 9 designated districts, ~1,500 contributing buildings) and S-20 (parcel-scale individual landmarks, ~135 properties) are DISTINCT overlays with different geographic triggers and different SB 9 / CEQA implications. v1 conflated them. [confirmed §17.84]
  • S-13 by-right 100%-affordable — effective 2024-12-19 per Zoning Code Bulletin. Unlimited density for 100%-affordable meeting objective design standards. Stacks with state DBL but S-13 itself is not stackable with local density bonus. [confirmed §17.95]
  • RM lot-area-per-unit density method (not du/ac cap). RM-1: 1,650 sf/unit; RM-2: 1,400; RM-3: 1,200; RM-4: 1,100. [confirmed §17.17.050]
  • RU height transition step-back: 30 ft max at setback when abutting RH/RD/RM, +1 ft per ft horizontal distance away. Oakland-specific envelope shape on RU parcels adjacent to SF zones. [confirmed §17.19.050]
  • GPU Phase 1 small-lot density increase (April 2023) — RD / RM lots <4,000 sf may accommodate 4+ units with ~5% FAR increase. Local companion to SB 9 / state density policy. [confirmed GPU Phase 1 April 2023]
  • Work/Live units in industrial zones — ≤4 persons per unit, existing-building conversion; CIX/IG/IO expansion where artist/artisan residents present or ≤300 ft from residential zone. Codifies Jack London / Embarcadero loft conversions. [confirmed §17.73.040]
  • Non-conforming warehouse lofts in M-zones — retained as non-conforming residential occupancy per §17.114 with conversion allowances. [confirmed §17.114]
  • BART / AC Transit Tempo / ferry saturation — substantially all Oakland RU / RM (upper tiers) / CC / downtown mixed-use districts lie within ½ mi of at least one AB 2097 qualifying major transit stop. Parking minimums effectively preempted citywide on most developable parcels. [confirmed GC §65863.2]
  • SB 9 + ADU stacking could theoretically yield 5+ units on an originally SF parcel (2 from SB 9 split × 2 lots + 1 ADU + 1 JADU), subject to VHFHSZ / historic / SFHA / coastal exclusions. [inferred]
  • 6th-cycle Housing Element under HCD review — initial non-compliance findings, ongoing resubmissions through 2024–2026. Builder's Remedy gating is live whenever non-certified. [under_review — HCD dashboard JS-rendered, not fetched live]
  • Coastal Zone narrow strip — Outer Harbor / Estuary / Jack London frontage. CDP required + SB 423 coastal streamlining (effective 2025-01-01). [confirmed GC §65913.4]

Formulas

Definitions

height
Grade to highest point of structure per Title 17.
lot_coverage
Building footprint / lot area. Dimensional tables not retrieved live in v2 pass; partial for most districts.
far
Gross floor area / lot area. Partial for most districts.
du_ac
Dwelling units per acre; RM series uses lot-area-per-unit method (sf/unit).
impervious_cover
setback_front
Front property line to nearest building face.
setback_side
Side property line to nearest building face.
setback_rear
Rear property line to nearest building face.
parking
Spaces per dwelling unit unless noted. Preempted to 0 within ½ mile major transit per AB 2097 / GC §65863.2.
height_transition
30 ft at setback + 1 ft per ft of horizontal distance from RH/RD/RM boundary (RU districts per Ch. 17.19.050; RM/RH per Ch. 17.17 / 17.13).

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far
max_units_from_density
lot_area_sf * du_ac / 43560
max_units_from_lot_area_per_unit
lot_area_sf / sf_per_unit (RM method)
buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2
buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft
buildable_envelope_sf
buildable_width_ft * buildable_depth_ft
max_stories_approx
max_height_ft / 10
max_gfa_from_envelope
min(buildable_envelope_sf * max_stories_approx, max_gfa_sf)
parking_required
units * parking

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

—
—
Sort by —
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
◄
prev
►
next
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Primary source
Oakland Municipal Code Title 17 — Planning Code
Through Zoning Code Bulletin 2024-12-19 (S-13 by-right effective) + GPU Phase 1 (April 2023) · retrieved 2026-04-19
Citations
  1. [1] §17.13.050
  2. [2] §17.13.050
  3. [3] §17.13.050
  4. [4] §17.13.050
  5. [5] §17.13
  6. [6] §17.13.050
  7. [7] §17.13.050
  8. [8] §17.13
  9. [9] §17.13.050
  10. [10] §17.13.050
  11. [11] §17.13
  12. [12] §17.13.050
  13. [13] i§17.15
  14. [14] i§17.15
  15. [15] i§17.15
  16. [16] i§17.15
  17. [17] i§17.15
  18. [18] i§17.15
  19. [19] i§17.15
  20. [20] i§17.15
  21. [21] i§17.17
  22. [22] i§17.17
  23. [23] §17.17.050
  24. [24] i§17.17
  25. [25] i§17.17
  26. [26] §17.17.050
  27. [27] i§17.17
  28. [28] i§17.17
  29. [29] §17.17.050
  30. [30] i§17.17
  31. [31] i§17.17
  32. [32] §17.17.050
  33. [33] i§17.19
  34. [34] i§17.19
  35. [35] i§17.19
  36. [36] i§17.19
  37. [37] i§17.19
  38. [38] i§17.19
  39. [39] i§17.19
  40. [40] i§17.19
  41. [41] i§17.35
  42. [42] i§17.35
  43. [43] i§17.35
  44. [44] §17.84
  45. [45] §17.84
  46. [46] §17.84
  47. [47] §17.84
  48. [48] §17.84
  49. [49] GC §65852.21
  50. [50] §17.84
  51. [51] §17.136
  52. [52] §17.84
  53. [53] CEQA
  54. [54] GC §65852.21
  55. [55] §17.95
  56. [56] §17.95
  57. [57] GC §65915(p)
  58. [58] §17.95 / GC §65915
  59. [59] GC §65915(f)(5)
  60. [60] Oakland Housing Element
  61. [61] Zoning Code Bulletin Dec 2024
  62. [62] §17.96
  63. [63] §17.96
  64. [64] GC §65915
  65. [65] §17.96
  66. [66] §17.96
  67. [67] Oakland Housing Element
  68. [68] FEMA
  69. [69] FAA Part 77
  70. [70] CA Coastal Act
  71. [71] GC §65913.4
  72. [72] CA Coastal Commission mapped boundary

Research status

Publication gates

primary url presentpassed
no aggregator citedpassed
confidence tags full formpassed
overlays have parameters trigger confidencepassed
preempt section city specificpassed

Data quality

55%completeness62 confirmed28 partial12 inferred
Documented gaps
  • Chapter 17.13 (RH), 17.15 (RD), 17.17 (RM), 17.19 (RU), 17.35 (CC), 17.72 (industrial), 17.73 (work/live), 17.95 (S-13), 17.96 (S-14), 17.114 (non-conforming) detailed dimensional tables not retrieved live in v2 pass — heights, lot coverage, FAR, and setbacks carry status=partial or inferred for most districts
  • CC-1..3 detailed FAR / lot coverage / parking ratios not resolved live
  • Downtown / Jack London / CBD chapter-level standards not resolved live
  • M-20 / M-30 / M-40 industrial standards not resolved live
  • Complete S-1..S-20 overlay inventory not enumerated (only S-7, S-13, S-14, S-20 decomposed; FP, AP, CZ documented)
  • HCD Housing Element certification status for Oakland 6th-cycle (Builder's Remedy gating) not confirmed live — JS-rendered dashboard
  • HCD APR SB 423 eligibility determination (10% / 50% / exempt) for Oakland not confirmed live — JS-rendered dashboard
  • AB 2097 qualifying AC Transit corridor geography requires parcel-level mapping against 15-min peak headway data

Known issues

cohort:needs-dom-retrievalfreshness:volatileblocker:municodedata:gaps-present

Verification

last_verified_at2026-04-19T00:00:00Z
verifier_specialistoakl-2026-04-19-v2
verifier_version1.0
verification_resultpassed_pending_browser_retrieval
atomic_claims_checked38
atomic_claims_passed38
atomic_claims_failed0
failed_claims
narrative_refnarratives/oakland-ca/oakl-2026-04-19-v2.json

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.

AnaheimCoronaFresnoIrvineMoreno ValleyPalmdaleRiversideSan Jose