Zoning › California › San Diego County › Chula Vista

Chula Vista, CA Zoning

Euclidean-zoning. 17 districts · 8 overlays · 7 applicable state preemptions.

Overview

Code type
euclidean
Naming convention
mixed

R-E / R-1 / R-2 / R-3 residential density ladder; C-O / C-N / C-B / C-C / C-T / C-V commercial by intensity and context; I-R / I-L / I industrial ladder. Not lot-size-encoded. Not form-based. Large eastern portion is governed by adopted P-C (Planned Community) Sectional Planning Area plans per §19.48 — Otay Ranch, EastLake, Rancho del Rey, Sunbow — where SPA-plan standards supersede generic Title 19 schedules. Bayfront portion governed by §19.81 Bayfront Specific Plan (base-replacing). CVMC calls overlays 'modifying districts' per §19.56. | naming_convention_raw=density-ladder-residential + intensity-context-commercial ; sub_flags_raw=[heavy-state-preemption, planned-community-dominant, bayfront-specific-plan, brown-field-alucp, coastal-zone-partial]

Worth knowing
  • CRITICAL — Prior v1 profile cited CVMC Title 20; this is WRONG. Chula Vista's zoning is Title 19 (Planning and Zoning). All §20.xx citations in the v1 record were fabricated. [confirmed via chulavista.municipal.codes TOC]
  • CVMC uses 'modifying district' terminology rather than 'overlay' — string-search for 'overlay' in Title 19 returns nothing. Modifying districts are P, D, H, E, HP per §19.56. [confirmed §19.56]
  • R-1 has a lot-size-dependent FAR: 45% on lots ≥7,000 sf; 50% or 3,150 sf absolute (whichever less) on lots <7,000 sf per §19.24.060. Non-linear. [confirmed §19.24.060]

+ 7 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

com 6spec 4res_sf 3ind 3res_mf 1
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
R-EResidential Estatesres_sf—[4]—[5]—[6]—[7]—[8]—[9]—[1] / —[2] / —[3]
R-1Single-Family Residenceres_sf7,000 sf[13]—[14]—[15]0.45[16]—[17]—[18]—[10] / —[11] / —[12]
R-2One- and Two-Family Residenceres_sf—[22]—[23]—[24]—[25]—[26]—[27]—[19] / —[20] / —[21]
R-3Apartment Residentialres_mf—[31]54 ft[32]—[33]—[34]—[35]—[36]—[28] / —[29] / —[30]
C-OAdministrative and Professional Officecom—[40]—[41]—[42]—[43]——[44]—[37] / —[38] / —[39]
C-NNeighborhood Commercialcom—[48]—[49]—[50]—[51]——[52]—[45] / —[46] / —[47]
C-BCentral Commercialcom—[56]—[57]—[58]—[59]——[60]—[53] / —[54] / —[55]
C-CCentral Commercial — Third Avenuecom—[64]—[65]—[66]—[67]——[68]—[61] / —[62] / —[63]
C-TThoroughfare Commercialcom—[72]—[73]—[74]—[75]——[76]—[69] / —[70] / —[71]
C-VVisitor Commercialcom—[80]—[81]—[82]—[83]——[84]—[77] / —[78] / —[79]
I-RResearch Industrialind—[88]—[89]—[90]—[91]——[92]—[85] / —[86] / —[87]
I-LLimited Industrialind—[96]—[97]—[98]—[99]——[100]—[93] / —[94] / —[95]
IGeneral Industrialind—[104]—[105]—[106]—[107]——[108]—[101] / —[102] / —[103]
P-CPlanned Communityspec——————— / — / —
AAgriculturalspec——————— / — / —
P-QPublic/Quasi-Publicspec——————— / — / —
O-SOpen Spacespec——————— / — / —

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

P
Precise Plan Modifying District
SPEC
CVMC §19.56.040–048

Mapped P districts on zoning map; case-by-case application where the subject property or neighborhood is 'unique by virtue of topography, geological characteristics, access, configuration, traffic circulation or some social or historic situation requiring special handling' per §19.56.040.

precise_plan_supersedes_base_zone1[109]
uniqueness_finding_required1[110]
council_approval_required1[111]
design_review_of_architecture_and_signs1[112]
D
Design Modifying District
CON
CVMC §19.56 (invokes §19.14.420–480 design review)

Wherever the D district is established on the zoning map.

site_plan_approval_required1[113]
architectural_approval_required1[114]
applies_to_all_uses_within_district1[115]
H
Hillside Modifying District
HS
CVMC §19.56.200–290

Mapped hillside areas with qualifying average natural slope; may be attached to any base zone. Predominant in eastern Chula Vista foothills (Rancho del Rey ridges, San Miguel foothills, Otay Mountain fringe).

applies_to_any_base_zone1[116]
density_determined_by_average_natural_slope1[117]
grading_extent_slope_based1[118]
open_space_requirements1[119]
off_street_parking_bay_rules1[120]
presubmission_conference_required1[121]
full_density_slope_table—[122]
E
Equestrian Modifying District
CON
CVMC §19.56.120

Mapped E districts — typically R-E and large-lot R-1 zones in eastern Chula Vista where horsekeeping is an established use.

horsekeeping_permitted1[123]
additional_conditions_apply1[124]
HP
Historic Preservation Modifying District
HP
CVMC §19.56.300+

Mapped HP districts and designated individual historic resources on Chula Vista Historic Resources list.

purpose_is_historic_preservation1[125]
alterations_require_approval1[126]
demolition_controls1[127]
not_state_registered_historic_district1[128]
BF
Bayfront Specific Plan Area
SPEC
CVMC §19.81 (Bayfront Specific Plan) + §19.83 (Coastal Development Permit Procedures); implemented via Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Program (Land Use Plan + Specific Plan, amended Dec 5, 2017, amendments ongoing)

Coastal lands from Chula Vista's northern boundary south to Palomar Street, west of and including Interstate 5. Encompasses approximately 535 acres including Port-jurisdiction lands (separate CDP process) and City-jurisdiction lands (CVMC §19.81/19.83).

specific_plan_replaces_base_zoning1[129]
coastal_development_permit_required1[130]
california_coastal_commission_oversight1[131]
sb9_preempted_by_state_law1[132]
public_access_required1[133]
port_vs_city_jurisdiction_split1[134]
full_dimensional_schedule—[135]
F-1/F-2
Floodway / Floodplain (F-1 / F-2)
FP
CVMC §19.84.004 (Open-space schedule — floodway F-1 and floodplain fringe F-2); CVMC Title 14/15 flood damage prevention (federal NFIP compliance)

FEMA-mapped SFHA along Otay River, Sweetwater River, Telegraph Canyon Creek, Poggi Canyon Creek; designated F-1 (floodway, no structures) and F-2 (floodplain fringe, elevation required) on Chula Vista zoning map.

f1_no_structures_in_floodway1[136]
f2_elevation_required_in_fringe1[137]
nfip_compliance_required1[138]
full_f1_f2_schedule—[139]
ALUCP-BRF
Brown Field ALUCP (airport compatibility — external)
AP
External — San Diego County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for Brown Field Municipal Airport (SDM). California state law (PUC §21670 et seq.) requires CVMC consistency with adopted ALUCP.

Parcels within Brown Field Review Area 1 (safety/noise critical) and Review Area 2 (FAA Part 77 airspace). Brown Field is ~1 mi south of Chula Vista's southern boundary (Otay Mesa). Some southern Chula Vista parcels fall within 60–65 dB CNEL contours and Part 77 airspace surfaces.

height_limit_per_part77_surfaces1[140]
noise_sensitive_use_restrictions_in_65_cnel1[141]
avigation_easement_may_be_required1[142]
safety_zone_use_restrictions1[143]
full_brown_field_contour_map—[144]

State preemptions

CA-ADU-GC§66411.7-66411.8applies
Qualifying condition
All CA cities. Chula Vista's R-E, R-1, R-2, R-3 and mixed-use P-C residential components must permit ADUs by-right per state law. CVMC provisions cannot impose minimum lot size, owner-occupancy beyond statute, or parking within ½ mi of MTS Blue Line trolley / in historic districts / within existing structure. | title=Accessory Dwelling Units / JADUs ; effect_on_city=Ministerial approval with 60-day shot clock; up to 1,200 sf detached ADUs; up to 500 sf JADUs; no owner-occupancy requirement (statute sunset verified); up to 8 ADUs on qualifying multifamily lots under SB 1211 (eff. 2025-01-01). Preempts any Chula Vista provision exceeding state caps.
CA-SB9-GC§65852.21-66411.7applies
Qualifying condition
Chula Vista is a CA general-law city with R-E, R-1 single-family zones. Implemented locally at CVMC §19.58.450. Applies per-parcel conditional on exclusions. Chula Vista contains: (a) FEMA SFHA along Otay River, Sweetwater River, Telegraph Canyon Creek — excluded; (b) CalFire Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in eastern hillside/Otay Mountain fringe — excluded per-parcel; (c) California Coastal Zone (Bayfront LCP area west of I-5 from northern boundary to Palomar St) — excluded per GC §65852.21(a)(2)(D); (d) no state-registered historic districts (local HP designations do not qualify as state registration); (e) Brown Field AICUZ/ALUCP safety zones do NOT exclude SB 9 per statute but layer independent restrictions. | title=SB 9 — California HOME Act (Lot Splits + Duplex Conversion) ; effect_on_city=Ministerial up-to-4-units on qualifying R-1/R-E parcels (lot split + duplex on each resulting lot). City cannot require lot size >40% of original, setback >4 ft side/rear, or FAR <0.8 on resulting lots. SB 450 (2024) strengthens ministerial procedural limits effective 2024-07-01. CVMC §19.58.450 implements; does not shrink statutory entitlement. ; per_parcel_conditional=True ; exclusions=['FEMA SFHA (Otay River / Sweetwater River / Telegraph Canyon Creek per-parcel)', 'CalFire VHFHSZ (eastern hillside per-parcel)', 'coastal zone (Bayfront LCP area — statutorily excluded)', 'state-registered historic districts (none; local HP designations do not qualify)']
CA-DensityBonus-GC§65915applies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Applies to any Chula Vista project meeting affordability thresholds (5% VLI, 10% LI, 10% moderate for-sale, or 100% affordable). AB 1287 allows stacking to achieve up to 100% density bonus on qualifying projects. | title=State Density Bonus Law + AB 1287 (2023) ; effect_on_city=Up to 100% density bonus (AB 1287 stacked) on R-3, C-V mixed-use, C-B/C-C downtown mixed-use, and P-C residential components with adopted SPAs. Can waive base du_ac, max_height_ft (within reason), and base setbacks as concessions/incentives (1 per 10% VLI, 2 per 20%, 3 per 30%). State §65915(p) parking ratios (0.5 studios/1BR; 1.0 for 2-3BR; 1.5 for 4+BR) preempt Chula Vista parking standards on affordable components.
CA-AB2097applies
Qualifying condition
Chula Vista is served by MTS Blue Line light rail with stations at H Street, E Street, Palomar, and Bayfront (Bayfront station completed 2024). MTS Blue Line qualifies as 'major transit stop' under PRC §21064.3 (rail fixed-guideway). Parcels within ½ mile of any MTS Blue Line station are AB 2097-eligible. Additionally, MTS Rapid 225 (Otay Mesa / San Ysidro corridor) and high-frequency MTS bus routes on Broadway, Third Ave, H Street, E Street, Palomar Street with qualifying headway also trigger AB 2097. | title=AB 2097 — Parking Mandate Elimination Near Transit ; effect_on_city=No minimum parking may be required for residential, commercial, or mixed-use within ½ mile of MTS Blue Line stations (H Street, E Street, Palomar, Bayfront) or qualifying high-frequency bus intersections. Preempts CVMC §19.62 parking minimums within the buffer. Does not prohibit voluntary parking provision.
CA-SB423-GC§65913.4applies
Qualifying condition
SB 423 applies to sites zoned residential or mixed-use in cities not meeting their RHNA share. Chula Vista is under 6th-cycle RHNA (2021–2029) through SANDAG with 11,105-unit allocation. Chula Vista adopted its 6th-cycle Housing Element Aug 6, 2021 and HCD found it in substantial compliance. Per HCD SB 35/423 Determination dataset (subject to update), Chula Vista has generally tracked lower-income production; provisional tier = 10% affordability (subject to live HCD dashboard confirmation). Applies to R-3, C-V mixed-use, C-B/C-C downtown mixed-use, C-T/C-N mixed-use, and P-C residential SPA components. Excludes: coastal zone (Bayfront LCP area), VHFHSZ (eastern hillsides), sites with recent tenant displacement. | title=SB 423 — Streamlined Ministerial Multifamily Approval (extends SB 35, 2024–2036) ; effect_on_city=Ministerial by-right approval for qualifying multifamily ≥10% affordable (LI rental / moderate for-sale) at current provisional tier. Bypasses design review (including CVMC §19.56 D district). Prevailing wage / skilled-and-trained workforce requirements apply for 10+ unit projects. ; tier=10% ; tier_source=provisional — pending live HCD SMAP Dashboard lookup ; source_url=https://data.ca.gov/dataset/sb-35-data ; source_type=primary_dataset ; source_accessed=2026-04-19 ; evidence=Subject to SB 35/423 streamlined ministerial approval; 6th-cycle housing element in substantial compliance; lower-income production tracking informs tier.
CA-AB2011-GC§65912.100applies
Qualifying condition
Chula Vista has commercially-zoned parcels along defined corridors (Broadway, Third Ave, H Street, E Street, Palomar Street, Telegraph Canyon Rd, L Street) that qualify as 'commercial corridors' under AB 2011. 100% affordable projects by-right on any commercial site; mixed-income by-right on corridor sites (excluding industrial-only and office-only zones; minimum density not less than jurisdiction's default). | title=AB 2011 — Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act ; effect_on_city=Ministerial approval for qualifying multifamily on C-N, C-B, C-C, C-T, C-V corridor sites. 100% affordable bypasses discretionary review (including CVMC D district design review and §19.14 procedures). Overlaps with SB 423 — developers choose pathway. Prevailing wage required.
FED-AICUZ-BROWN-FIELDapplies
Qualifying condition
Brown Field Municipal Airport (SDM, City of San Diego-owned) is ~1 mi south of Chula Vista's southern boundary (Otay Mesa edge). 60–65 dB CNEL noise contours and FAA Part 77 airspace surfaces extend north into southern Chula Vista parcels. San Diego County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for Brown Field is the consistency-required plan per California PUC §21670 et seq. | title=AICUZ / ALUCP — Brown Field Municipal Airport (federal-state conflict) ; effect_on_city=Height limits per 14 CFR §77 surfaces; noise-sensitive use restrictions (residential, schools, hospitals) in 65 dB CNEL+ contours; avigation easement requirements; safety zone use restrictions. CVMC must be consistent with Brown Field ALUCP. SB 9 state preemption does NOT remove AICUZ restrictions (federal/state-airport-safety laws supersede); developer must satisfy both SB 9 and ALUCP requirements — status is federal_state_conflict per FM-P.
Non-applicable laws (4)
CA-BuildersRemedy-GC§65589.5(d)(5)applies
Qualifying condition
Chula Vista adopted its 6th-cycle Housing Element Aug 6, 2021 for the SANDAG region (planning period 2021–2029). HCD review documents confirm adopted status and substantial-compliance finding. HCD Housing Element Compliance Report lists Chula Vista as 'In' (compliant). Builder's Remedy not live. | title=Builder's Remedy (Housing Accountability Act) ; effect_on_city=Contingent — currently dormant. If Housing Element falls out of compliance (midcycle APR findings, HCD enforcement, or upcoming 7th-cycle adoption delay): projects with 20% LI or 100% moderate-income would bypass all local zoning (height, density, FAR, use, setbacks). City may only deny based on preponderance-of-evidence health/safety findings. ; source_url=https://data.ca.gov/dataset/housing-element-compliance-report ; source_type=primary_dataset ; source_accessed=2026-04-19 ; evidence=6th-cycle housing element adopted 2021-08-06; HCD compliance status 'In' (per HCD review letter and compliance report).
CA-SB10under_review
Qualifying condition
SB 10 is permissive — it authorizes but does not require cities to zone up to 10 units/parcel near transit or urban infill via simple resolution (CEQA-exempt). No evidence Chula Vista has adopted an SB 10 resolution; Title 19 contains no SB 10-adoption reference. Chula Vista's transit-upzoning vehicles are the Bayfront LCP, P-C SPA amendments, and AB 2097 parking preemption — not SB 10. | title=SB 10 — Local Upzoning Authorization ; effect_on_city=None unless/until Chula Vista adopts an SB 10 resolution. ; reason=Opt-in local resolution; Chula Vista has not adopted.
FED-AICUZ-MIRAMARunder_review
Qualifying condition
MCAS Miramar is ~15+ miles north of Chula Vista city limits. 65 dB CNEL noise contours from the 2020 MCAS Miramar AICUZ Update do not extend south to Chula Vista. Part 77 airspace surfaces from Miramar do not reach Chula Vista at altitudes relevant to land use. | title=AICUZ — MCAS Miramar (not materially applicable to Chula Vista) ; effect_on_city=None. Prior v1 record emphasized MCAS Miramar as a Chula Vista overlay driver; this is incorrect. Brown Field (and secondarily Naval Base San Diego helicopter operations) is the relevant airport compatibility driver. ; reason=Distance / contour non-overlap with Chula Vista jurisdiction.
FED-AICUZ-NAVY-SDunder_review
Qualifying condition
Naval Base San Diego (32nd Street Naval Station) is ~3 mi north of Chula Vista's Bayfront. NAS North Island is on Coronado ~5–7 mi NW across the Bay. Neither is primarily a fixed-wing noise contour generator reaching Chula Vista at 65 dB CNEL. Helicopter operations may be audible far-north Chula Vista but do not generate ALUCP-level noise contours intruding on Chula Vista parcels. | title=AICUZ — Naval Base San Diego / NAS North Island (minor applicability) ; effect_on_city=None at ALUCP consistency level. Developers near northern Bayfront may need to consider helicopter overflight disclosure but this is not a CVMC or ALUCP overlay. ; reason=AICUZ noise contours do not reach Chula Vista jurisdiction at applicable thresholds.

Adopted building codes

Statewide mandatory minimum

IBC
2024 CBC
IRC
2024 CRC
NEC
2023
IFC
2024
IECC (Residential)
2024 CALGreen
IECC (Commercial)
2024 CALGreen

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Quirks & notes

  • CRITICAL — Prior v1 profile cited CVMC Title 20; this is WRONG. Chula Vista's zoning is Title 19 (Planning and Zoning). All §20.xx citations in the v1 record were fabricated. [confirmed via chulavista.municipal.codes TOC]
  • CVMC uses 'modifying district' terminology rather than 'overlay' — string-search for 'overlay' in Title 19 returns nothing. Modifying districts are P, D, H, E, HP per §19.56. [confirmed §19.56]
  • R-1 has a lot-size-dependent FAR: 45% on lots ≥7,000 sf; 50% or 3,150 sf absolute (whichever less) on lots <7,000 sf per §19.24.060. Non-linear. [confirmed §19.24.060]
  • H hillside modifying district replaces generic du_ac with a slope-based density formula — permitted density and extent of grading are determined by average natural slope per §19.56.200+. [confirmed §19.56.200]
  • P-C Planned Community zones (§19.48) — Otay Ranch, EastLake, Rancho del Rey, Sunbow — dominate eastern Chula Vista. Generic Title 19 dimensional schedules DO NOT APPLY within P-C areas; the adopted SPA plan governs. [confirmed §19.48]
  • Bayfront Specific Plan (§19.81) + CDP procedures (§19.83) govern the western coastal area (535 acres, Port + City jurisdiction). Base R-/C-/I- districts do not apply within the LCP area. [confirmed §19.81, §19.83]
  • SB 9 implementation is codified at CVMC §19.58.450 — two-unit residential and urban lot split parcel maps in single-family zones are ministerial. [confirmed §19.58.450]
  • Brown Field Municipal Airport (SDM) is the dominant airport compatibility driver — NOT MCAS Miramar. Brown Field is ~1 mi south of Chula Vista (Otay Mesa); 60–65 dB CNEL contours extend north into southern Chula Vista parcels. ALUCP consistency is required per PUC §21670. [confirmed SDCRAA ALUCP + 14 CFR §77]
  • R-3 side/rear setbacks use a story-based step-up rule — +2 ft for each story above 25 ft per §19.28.060. R-3 height cap is 54 ft principal / 25 ft accessory. [confirmed §19.28.060]
  • chulavista.municipal.codes returns 403 to scripted WebFetch. Chapter text retrieval requires browser-based access or WebSearch snippets. Full §19.22–§19.48 schedule tables, §19.84.00x consolidated tables, and §19.56.2xx hillside density tables not retrieved live — marked partial with retrieval_failure_reason.

Formulas

Definitions

height
Grade to highest point of structure; R-3 principal 54 ft cap, accessory 25 ft cap (§19.28.060).
lot_coverage
Building footprint / lot area.
far
Gross floor area / lot area. R-1 uses lot-size-dependent FAR: 45% on lots ≥7,000 sf; 50% or 3,150 sf (whichever less) on lots <7,000 sf per §19.24.060.
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross acre — applied generically; H hillside modifying district replaces du_ac with slope-based formula per §19.56.200+.
setback_front
Front property line to nearest building face.
setback_side
Side property line to nearest building face; R-3 increases setback 2 ft per story above 25 ft (§19.28.060).
setback_rear
Rear property line to nearest building face; R-3 steps up per §19.28.060 same as side.
parking
Spaces per dwelling unit unless noted; AB 2097 preempts minimums within ½ mi of qualifying transit (MTS Blue Line stops).

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far
r1_small_lot_gfa_sf
min(lot_area_sf * 0.50, 3150)
r1_large_lot_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * 0.45
max_units_from_density
lot_area_sf * du_ac / 43560
buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2
buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft
buildable_envelope_sf
buildable_width_ft * buildable_depth_ft
max_stories_approx
max_height_ft / 10
r3_story_step_up_rule
R-3 side/rear setbacks increase 2 ft for each story above 25 ft (§19.28.060)
h_hillside_density
Permitted du_ac computed from average natural slope per §19.56.200+ (replaces generic du_ac for hillside-overlaid parcels)

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

—
—
Sort by —
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
◄
prev
►
next
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Primary source
Title 19 — Planning and Zoning, Chula Vista Municipal Code
Current through Ord. 3617 · retrieved 2026-04-19
Citations
  1. [1] §19.22.070
  2. [2] §19.22.070
  3. [3] §19.22.070
  4. [4] §19.22.070
  5. [5] §19.22.070
  6. [6] §19.22.070
  7. [7] §19.22
  8. [8] §19.22
  9. [9] §19.62
  10. [10] §19.24.070
  11. [11] §19.24.070
  12. [12] §19.24.100
  13. [13] §19.24
  14. [14] §19.24.070
  15. [15] §19.24.070
  16. [16] §19.24.060
  17. [17] §19.24
  18. [18] §19.62
  19. [19] §19.26.070
  20. [20] §19.26.070
  21. [21] §19.26.070
  22. [22] §19.26.070
  23. [23] §19.26.070
  24. [24] §19.26.070
  25. [25] §19.26
  26. [26] §19.26
  27. [27] §19.62
  28. [28] §19.28.070
  29. [29] §19.28.060
  30. [30] §19.28.060
  31. [31] §19.28.070
  32. [32] §19.28.060
  33. [33] §19.28.070
  34. [34] §19.28
  35. [35] §19.28
  36. [36] §19.62
  37. [37] §19.84.002
  38. [38] §19.84.002
  39. [39] §19.84.002
  40. [40] §19.84.002
  41. [41] §19.84.002
  42. [42] §19.84.002
  43. [43] §19.84.002
  44. [44] §19.62
  45. [45] §19.84.002
  46. [46] §19.84.002
  47. [47] §19.84.002
  48. [48] §19.84.002
  49. [49] §19.84.002
  50. [50] §19.84.002
  51. [51] §19.84.002
  52. [52] §19.62
  53. [53] §19.84.002
  54. [54] §19.84.002
  55. [55] §19.84.002
  56. [56] §19.84.002
  57. [57] §19.84.002
  58. [58] §19.84.002
  59. [59] §19.84.002
  60. [60] §19.62
  61. [61] §19.84.002
  62. [62] §19.84.002
  63. [63] §19.84.002
  64. [64] §19.84.002
  65. [65] §19.84.002
  66. [66] §19.84.002
  67. [67] §19.84.002
  68. [68] §19.62
  69. [69] §19.84.002
  70. [70] §19.84.002
  71. [71] §19.84.002
  72. [72] §19.84.002
  73. [73] §19.84.002
  74. [74] §19.84.002
  75. [75] §19.84.002
  76. [76] §19.62
  77. [77] §19.84.002
  78. [78] §19.84.002
  79. [79] §19.84.002
  80. [80] §19.84.002
  81. [81] §19.84.002
  82. [82] §19.84.002
  83. [83] §19.84.002
  84. [84] §19.62
  85. [85] §19.84.003
  86. [86] §19.84.003
  87. [87] §19.84.003
  88. [88] §19.84.003
  89. [89] §19.84.003
  90. [90] §19.84.003
  91. [91] §19.84.003
  92. [92] §19.62
  93. [93] §19.84.003
  94. [94] §19.84.003
  95. [95] §19.84.003
  96. [96] §19.84.003
  97. [97] §19.84.003
  98. [98] §19.84.003
  99. [99] §19.84.003
  100. [100] §19.62
  101. [101] §19.84.003
  102. [102] §19.84.003
  103. [103] §19.84.003
  104. [104] §19.84.003
  105. [105] §19.84.003
  106. [106] §19.84.003
  107. [107] §19.84.003
  108. [108] §19.62
  109. [109] §19.56.040
  110. [110] §19.56.040
  111. [111] §19.56.041
  112. [112] §19.56.040
  113. [113] §19.56
  114. [114] §19.56
  115. [115] §19.56
  116. [116] §19.56
  117. [117] §19.56.200
  118. [118] §19.56.200
  119. [119] §19.56.220
  120. [120] §19.56.260
  121. [121] §19.56
  122. [122] §19.56.200+
  123. [123] §19.56.120
  124. [124] §19.56.120
  125. [125] §19.56.300
  126. [126] §19.56.300
  127. [127] §19.56.300+
  128. [128] (state law)
  129. [129] §19.81
  130. [130] §19.83
  131. [131] (CCC appeal jurisdiction)
  132. [132] (state law)
  133. [133] (Coastal Act §30210–30214)
  134. [134] (Chula Vista Bayfront LCP)
  135. [135] §19.81+
  136. [136] §19.84.004
  137. [137] §19.84.004
  138. [138] (44 CFR §60)
  139. [139] §19.84.004
  140. [140] (14 CFR §77)
  141. [141] (Brown Field ALUCP)
  142. [142] (Brown Field ALUCP)
  143. [143] (Brown Field ALUCP)
  144. [144] (external)

Research status

Publication gates

primary url presentpassedcode_source = https://chulavista.municipal.codes/CVMC/19 (publisher-hosted city subdomain; canonical CVMC Title 19 landing). Fallback chulavistaca.gov portal present. Neither is an aggregator. Resolved URL captured, not a /latest/ alias.
no aggregator citedpassedRecord scan found no Zoneomics / Steadily / SitePlanGuide / SitePlanCreator / Propwire / Zonara / Unzoned references. All citations resolve to chulavista.municipal.codes §-references, CA Government Code, 14 CFR §77, HCD datasets, or city/SDCRAA domains.
confidence tags full formpassedAll confirmed claims carry c§X.XX form (e.g., c§19.24.060, c§19.28.060, c§19.28.080, c§19.56, c§19.58.450, c§19.81, c§19.83, c§19.48). No bare [confirmed] tags remain. Partial claims carry p§X.XX tokens with retrieval_failure_reason recorded (platform 403). Preemption entries carry GC §-references and federal CFR references.
overlays have parameters trigger confidencepassed8/8 overlays have non-empty parameters object (≥3 keys each), explicit geographic_trigger string, status, and citation. 3/8 status=confirmed (P precise plan, D design, E equestrian); 5/8 status=partial (H hillside, HP historic, Bayfront, F-1/F-2 floodplain, Brown Field ALUCP) with search_performed + retrieval_failure_reason documenting what was attempted and why values are pending. base_interaction string present on all.
preempt section city specificpassedstate_preemptions_applicable[] contains 11 per-law entries — 8 CA state laws (ADU, SB 9, Density Bonus, AB 2097, SB 423, AB 2011, Builder's Remedy, SB 10) + 3 federal overlays (AICUZ Brown Field federal_state_conflict, MCAS Miramar not_applicable, Naval Base SD not_applicable). Each has qualifying_condition_checked narrative specific to Chula Vista (MTS Blue Line stations H/E/Palomar/Bayfront, Otay/Sweetwater/Telegraph Canyon SFHA, eastern-hillside VHFHSZ overlap, 6th-cycle RHNA 11,105 SANDAG allocation, CVMC §19.58.450 SB 9 implementation, Brown Field ~1 mi south) and effect_on_city statement. Housing Element 'In' and SB 423 tier '10%' provisional populated. Not a link-stub.

Data quality

42%completeness28 confirmed32 partial
Documented gaps
  • Full R-1/R-2/R-3/R-E dimensional schedule tables (§19.22.070, §19.24.070/100, §19.26.070/080, §19.28.070) — setbacks, heights, lot coverage, lot width not retrieved live.
  • Consolidated commercial zone table (§19.84.002) — C-O, C-N, C-B, C-C, C-T, C-V dimensional values not retrieved.
  • Consolidated industrial zone table (§19.84.003) — I-R, I-L, I dimensional values not retrieved.
  • Consolidated public/quasi-public/open-space table (§19.84.004) — P-Q, O-S, F-1, F-2 values not retrieved.
  • Full H hillside density-by-slope schedule (§19.56.200+) not retrieved live.
  • Full HP historic preservation procedural parameters (§19.56.300+) not retrieved live.
  • Parking schedule (§19.62) not retrieved live — base parking ratios by land use missing.
  • Bayfront sub-district schedule (§19.81+) not retrieved live.
  • P-C SPA plans (Otay Ranch / EastLake / Rancho del Rey / Sunbow) — each has its own dimensional table outside Title 19 generic schedules; not retrieved here.
  • Brown Field ALUCP precise Chula Vista parcel coverage (contour/safety zone map) — SDCRAA ALUCP document retrieval required.

Known issues

freshness:volatiledata:gaps-present

Verification

last_verified_at2026-04-19T00:00:00Z
verifier_specialistverification-pass
verifier_version1.0
verification_resultpassed
atomic_claims_checked38
atomic_claims_passed36
atomic_claims_failed0
atomic_claims_partial2
failed_claims
partial_claimsSB 423 tier for Chula Vista — set provisionally to 10% pending live HCD SMAP Dashboard lookup; tier_source flag notes provisional status; Brown Field ALUCP Chula Vista parcel coverage — confirmed that northward contour intrusion exists; precise contour geometry requires SDCRAA map retrieval
narrative_refnarratives/chula-vista-ca/cvst-2026-04-19-v2.json

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.

AnaheimDowneyGardenaLakewoodNapaPalmdaleRiversideSan Jose