Overview
Code type
euclidean
Naming convention
letter-code
Worth knowing
- Footnote D: Along State Hwy 59 & U.S. Hwy 90 no structure shall be located within 50 ft. of the said R.O.W.
Districts
res_sf 6com 3ind 2spec 2res_mf 1res_th 1ag 1mu 1
| Code | Name | Category | Min lot | Height | Coverage | FAR | Du/ac | Parking | Setbacks F/S/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-1 | R-1 Low Density Single-Family Residential District | res_sf | 12,000 sf[4] | 35 ft[5] | 30[6] | — | 3[7] | — | 35[1] / 10[2] / 40[3] |
| R-1A | R-1A Medium Density Single-Family Residential District | res_sf | 10,500 sf[11] | 35 ft[12] | 30[13] | — | 4[14] | — | 35[8] / 10[9] / 35[10] |
| R-1B | R-1B High Density Single-Family Residential District | res_sf | 9,500 sf[18] | 35 ft[19] | 30[20] | — | 4.5[21] | — | 35[15] / 10[16] / 30[17] |
| R-2 | R-2 Medium Density Two-Family Residential District | res_sf | 11,000 sf[25] | 35 ft[26] | 40[27] | — | 4[28] | — | 35[22] / 10[23] / 35[24] |
| R-3 | R-3 Limited Multi-Family Residential District | res_mf | 8,500 sf[32] | 35 ft[33] | 50[34] | — | 15[35] | — | 35[29] / 10[30] / 35[31] |
| RMH | RMH Manufactured Home Residential District | res_sf | 7,000 sf[39] | 15 ft[40] | 40[41] | — | 6[42] | — | 30[36] / 10[37] / 30[38] |
| RGP | RGP Garden Patio Home Residential District | res_sf | 6,000 sf[46] | 35 ft[47] | 50[48] | — | 9[49] | — | 30[43] / 10[44] / 30[45] |
| RTH | RTH Townhouse Residential District | res_th | 3,000 sf[53] | 35 ft[54] | 50[55] | — | 15[56] | — | 30[50] / 15[51] / 25[52] |
| B-1 | B-1 Local Shopping District | com | —[60] | 35 ft[61] | —[62] | — | —[63] | — | 35[57] / 0[58] / 20[59] |
| B-2 | B-2 General Business District | com | —[67] | 50 ft[68] | —[69] | — | —[70] | — | 35[64] / 0[65] / 10[66] |
| B-3 | B-3 Medical Business District | com | —[74] | 35 ft[75] | —[76] | — | —[77] | — | 35[71] / 10[72] / 20[73] |
| I-1 | I-1 Light Industrial District | ind | —[81] | 50 ft[82] | —[83] | — | —[84] | — | 35[78] / 10[79] / 20[80] |
| I-2 | I-2 Heavy Industrial District | ind | —[88] | 100 ft[89] | —[90] | — | —[91] | — | 35[85] / 10[86] / 50[87] |
| AG | AG Agricultural District | ag | 871,200 sf[95] | —[96] | —[97] | — | —[98] | — | —[92] / —[93] / —[94] |
| MU | MU Multi-Use District | mu | —[102] | 50 ft[103] | —[104] | — | —[105] | — | 35[99] / 0[100] / 10[101] |
| PUD | PUD Planned Unit Development | spec | —[109] | —[110] | —[111] | — | —[112] | — | —[106] / —[107] / —[108] |
| FH-1 | FH-1 Flood Hazard District | spec | —[116] | —[117] | —[118] | — | 0[119] | — | —[113] / —[114] / —[115] |
Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found
Overlays
FH-1
FH-1 Flood Hazard District
FPBoundaries as specified in this ordinance hereunder, over all other districts, shown on the official zoning map.
| flood_hazards | Protected from hazards and financial losses caused by flooding. |
|---|
State preemptions
Ala. Code §11-52-75.1applies
Qualifying condition
City offers multi-family residential zoning (R-3 district), which triggers the statewide preemption allowing group homes with 10 or fewer unrelated residents.
Source
Robertsdale Land Use Ordinance Article VIII & IX
Effect
Explicitly abolishes local zoning exclusions for intellectual/mental health group homes with 10 or fewer residents in multi-family districts, subject to a 1,000-ft spacing limit.
Ala. Code §11-52-81 (Act 2025-331)applies
Qualifying condition
Procedural state-level appeal rules apply to all municipal Boards of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) in Alabama without population threshold.
Source
Alabama Act 2025-331
Effect
Implements a strict 30-day appeal window from BZA final decisions to circuit court, tried de novo; BZA decisions remain in effect during appeal unless stayed by the court.
Non-applicable laws (1)
Alabama Coastal Area Management Program (ACAMP)does_not_apply
Qualifying condition
Robertsdale is in Baldwin County, but its municipal boundary is located entirely inland with elevations averaging ~72 feet above sea level, placing it completely outside the continuous 10-foot top contour seaward to the 3-mile limit boundary of the coastal zone.
Source
ADEM Coastal Program & NOAA ACAMP Boundary Rules
Adopted building codes
Statewide
Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.
Amendment history
| Date | Kind | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-30 | retrieved at | |
| 2020-10-05 | last amended | Ordinance cover page |
Quirks & notes
- Footnote D: Along State Hwy 59 & U.S. Hwy 90 no structure shall be located within 50 ft. of the said R.O.W.
Massing explorer
Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.
Sort by
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
| District | Category | Height | FAR | Coverage | Setbacks | Parking | Density | Min lot | Overlays |
|---|
Sources & references
Citations
- [1] §9.3
- [2] §9.3
- [3] §9.3
- [4] §9.3
- [5] §9.3
- [6] §9.3
- [7] §9.3
- [8] §9.3
- [9] §9.3
- [10] §9.3
- [11] §9.3
- [12] §9.3
- [13] §9.3
- [14] §9.3
- [15] §9.3
- [16] §9.3
- [17] §9.3
- [18] §9.3
- [19] §9.3
- [20] §9.3
- [21] §9.3
- [22] §9.3
- [23] §9.3
- [24] §9.3
- [25] §9.3
- [26] §9.3
- [27] §9.3
- [28] §9.3
- [29] §9.3
- [30] §9.3
- [31] §9.3
- [32] §9.3
- [33] §9.3
- [34] §9.3
- [35] §9.3
- [36] §9.3
- [37] §9.3
- [38] §9.3
- [39] §9.3
- [40] §9.3
- [41] §9.3
- [42] §9.3
- [43] §9.3
- [44] §9.3
- [45] §9.3
- [46] §9.3
- [47] §9.3
- [48] §9.3
- [49] §9.3
- [50] §9.3
- [51] §9.3
- [52] §9.3
- [53] §9.3
- [54] §9.3
- [55] §9.3
- [56] §9.3
- [57] §9.3
- [58] §9.3
- [59] §9.3
- [60] §9.3
- [61] §9.3
- [62] §9.3
- [63] §9.3
- [64] §9.3
- [65] §9.3
- [66] §9.3
- [67] §9.3
- [68] §9.3
- [69] §9.3
- [70] §9.3
- [71] §9.3
- [72] §9.3
- [73] §9.3
- [74] §9.3
- [75] §9.3
- [76] §9.3
- [77] §9.3
- [78] §9.3
- [79] §9.3
- [80] §9.3
- [81] §9.3
- [82] §9.3
- [83] §9.3
- [84] §9.3
- [85] §9.3
- [86] §9.3
- [87] §9.3
- [88] §9.3
- [89] §9.3
- [90] §9.3
- [91] §9.3
- [92] §9.3
- [93] §9.3
- [94] §9.3
- [95] §9.3
- [96] §9.3
- [97] §9.3
- [98] §9.3
- [99] §9.3
- [100] §9.3
- [101] §9.3
- [102] §9.3
- [103] §9.3
- [104] §9.3
- [105] §9.3
- [106] §9.3
- [107] §9.3
- [108] §9.3
- [109] §9.3
- [110] §9.3
- [111] §9.3
- [112] §9.3
- [113] §9.3
- [114] §9.3
- [115] §9.3
- [116] §9.3
- [117] §9.3
- [118] §9.3
- [119] §9.3
Research status
Publication gates
| primary url present | passed | |
|---|---|---|
| no aggregator cited | passed | |
| confidence tags full form | passed | |
| overlays have parameters trigger confidence | passed | |
| preempt section city specific | passed |
Data quality
95%completeness136 confirmed
Other cities in this state
Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.