Zoning › Colorado › Denver County › Denver

Denver, CO Zoning

Form-based-zoning. 31 districts · 6 overlays · 4 applicable state preemptions.

Overview

Code type
form-based
Naming convention
mixed

Naming convention is composite-context-form-size (3-part: context-form-size); recorded as 'mixed' per schema enum. Denver is the most developed form-based code among Colorado cities. Three-component district naming: (1) first letter = Neighborhood Context [S Suburban / E Urban Edge / U Urban / G General Urban / C Urban Center / D Downtown]; (2) second component = use/form [SU Single Unit / TU Two Unit / TH Townhouse / RH Row House / MX-MU Mixed Use / RX Residential Mixed Use / MS Main Street]; (3) third component = lot-size suffix [A=3,000 / B=4,500 / C=5,500 / D=6,000 / E=7,000 / F=8,500 / G=9,000 / H=10,000 / I=12,000 sf] OR story/intensity limit [-2.5 / -3 / -5 / -8 / -12 / -20 stories]. Dimensional standards (height, setbacks, lot coverage) are defined PER BUILDING FORM, not per district — a key difference from euclidean codes. Front 65% / Rear 35% zone lot division with separate height and form standards. Block-Sensitive Primary Street Setback applies to all residential districts citywide. No FAR-based regulation in residential.

Worth knowing
  • Denver DZC (2010) is the most developed form-based code among Colorado cities. Dimensional standards (height, setbacks, lot coverage) attach to Building Forms, not to districts. Reading a single 'setback' number per district is structurally wrong.
  • Block-Sensitive Primary Street Setback (DZC Tip Sheet 1): new residential primary structures must match the two nearest reference lots on the same block face — creating context-sensitive setbacks citywide rather than a uniform number per district.
  • Front 65% / Rear 35% zone lot division (§5.3): every residential zone lot formally divided into two height zones. In U-context: front zone 2.5 stories / 30 ft (with width bonus to 35 ft); rear zone 1 story / 17 ft. Unique in this study.

+ 11 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

res_sf 18mu 9res_mf 4
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
U-SU-AU-SU-Ares_sf3,000 sf[4]—[5]——[6]——[7]—[1] / —[2] / —[3]
U-SU-A1U-SU-A1res_sf3,000 sf[11]—[12]——[13]——[14]—[8] / —[9] / —[10]
U-SU-A2U-SU-A2res_sf3,000 sf[18]—[19]——[20]——[21]—[15] / —[16] / —[17]
U-SU-BU-SU-Bres_sf4,500 sf[25]—[26]——[27]——[28]—[22] / —[23] / —[24]
U-SU-B1U-SU-B1res_sf4,500 sf[32]—[33]——[34]——[35]—[29] / —[30] / —[31]
U-SU-B2U-SU-B2res_sf4,500 sf[39]—[40]——[41]——[42]—[36] / —[37] / —[38]
U-SU-CU-SU-Cres_sf5,500 sf[46]—[47]——[48]——[49]—[43] / —[44] / —[45]
U-SU-C1U-SU-C1res_sf5,500 sf[53]—[54]——[55]——[56]—[50] / —[51] / —[52]
U-SU-C2U-SU-C2res_sf5,500 sf[60]—[61]——[62]——[63]—[57] / —[58] / —[59]
U-SU-EU-SU-Eres_sf7,000 sf[67]—[68]——[69]——[70]—[64] / —[65] / —[66]
U-SU-E1U-SU-E1res_sf7,000 sf[74]—[75]——[76]——[77]—[71] / —[72] / —[73]
U-SU-HU-SU-Hres_sf10,000 sf[81]—[82]——[83]——[84]—[78] / —[79] / —[80]
U-SU-H1U-SU-H1res_sf10,000 sf[88]—[89]——[90]——[91]—[85] / —[86] / —[87]
U-TU-BU-TU-Bres_sf4,500 sf[95]—[96]——[97]——[98]—[92] / —[93] / —[94]
U-TU-B2U-TU-B2res_sf4,500 sf[102]—[103]——[104]——[105]—[99] / —[100] / —[101]
U-TU-CU-TU-Cres_sf5,500 sf[109]—[110]——[111]——[112]—[106] / —[107] / —[108]
U-RH-2.5U-RH-2.5res_mf—[116]35 ft[117]——[118]——[119]—[113] / —[114] / —[115]
U-RH-3AU-RH-3Ares_mf—[123]40 ft[124]——[125]——[126]—[120] / —[121] / —[122]
U-MX-2U-MX-2mu—[130]30 ft[131]——[132]——[133]—[127] / —[128] / —[129]
U-MX-3U-MX-3mu—[137]45 ft[138]——[139]——[140]—[134] / —[135] / —[136]
U-RX-5U-RX-5mu—[144]70 ft[145]——[146]—[147]—[148]—[141] / —[142] / —[143]
U-MS-*U-MS-2 / U-MS-3 / U-MS-5mu—[152]—[153]——[154]——[155]—[149] / —[150] / —[151]
E-SU-*E-SU-Dx (E Urban Edge SU line)res_sf—[159]—[160]——[161]——[162]—[156] / —[157] / —[158]
E-RH-2.5E-RH-2.5res_mf—[166]35 ft[167]——[168]——[169]—[163] / —[164] / —[165]
E-MU-2.5E-MU-2.5mu—[173]35 ft[174]——[175]——[176]—[170] / —[171] / —[172]
S-SU-*S-SU-* (Suburban SU line)res_sf—[180]—[181]——[182]——[183]—[177] / —[178] / —[179]
S-RH-2.5S-RH-2.5res_mf—[187]35 ft[188]——[189]——[190]—[184] / —[185] / —[186]
S-MU-*S-MU-3 / S-MU-5 / S-MU-8 / S-MU-12 / S-MU-20mu—[194]—[195]——[196]—[197]—[198]—[191] / —[192] / —[193]
G-*G-MU / G-RO / G-RH (General Urban context)mu—[202]—[203]——[204]——[205]—[199] / —[200] / —[201]
C-*C-MX / C-RX / C-CCN / C-MS (Urban Center context)mu—[209]—[210]——[211]—[212]—[213]—[206] / —[207] / —[208]
D-*D-C / D-LD / D-AS / D-CV (Downtown context)mu—[217]—[218]——[219]—[220]—[221]—[214] / —[215] / —[216]

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

CO
Conservation Overlay District
HP
DZC Article 9, Division 9.4.2

Map-based; applied to specific neighborhoods where Council has adopted Conservation Overlay via legislative rezoning to preserve existing neighborhood character. Examples include Potter Highlands CO, West Highland CO, Packard's Hill CO — each with individually adopted provisions.

purposeProtect and enhance existing neighborhood character in specific mapped areas
applicationAdditive to base zone district; may restrict otherwise-permitted uses or Building Forms
individual_adoptionEach CO adopted via separate Council ordinance with area-specific provisions (height caps, form restrictions, design criteria)
interaction_with_baseWhere CO is more restrictive than base, CO prevails
examplesPotter Highlands CO, West Highland CO, Packard's Hill CO, East 7th Avenue CO
UO
Use Overlay District
spec
DZC Article 9, Division 9.4.3

Map-based; applied via Council legislative action to allow or restrict specific uses that would not otherwise be permitted or prohibited in the base zone district.

purposeAllow or restrict specific uses beyond base district permissions
applicationGeographic-area-specific; additive or subtractive use list relative to base
typical_usee.g., allow ground-floor commercial in an otherwise residential district, or restrict drive-throughs on a specific corridor
interaction_with_baseUO modifies base use list; dimensional standards of base district still apply unless UO explicitly modifies
DO
Design Overlay District
spec
DZC Article 9, Division 9.4.4

Map-based; applied via Council legislative action to apply additional design requirements (facade materials, building form, streetscape, transparency) in specific areas.

purposeApply additional design requirements in specific areas
applicationArea-specific; additive design standards on top of base Building Form
typical_controlsfacade materials, transparency ratios, building form restrictions, streetscape requirements
examplesStapleton (Central Park) Design Overlay, Lowry Design Overlay, Denver International Airport area design standards
interaction_with_baseDO layers on top of base Building Form standards; DO standards prevail where stated
AIO
Airport Influence Overlay District
AP
DZC Article 9, Division 9.4.5 + FAA Part 77

Properties within Denver International Airport (DIA) influence area, primarily covering eastern Denver. Map-based; defined by FAA Part 77 imaginary surfaces + Denver-specific noise compatibility zones.

purposeHeight restrictions, noise attenuation requirements, land-use compatibility near DIA
height_hazardFAA Part 77 horizontal/conical/approach surfaces limit structure elevation
noise_attenuationsound attenuation construction standards for noise-sensitive uses within mapped noise contours
land_use_compatibilityrestrictions on noise-sensitive uses (residential, schools, hospitals) in high-noise zones
faa_notificationFAA Form 7460-1 notification required for structures penetrating imaginary surfaces
federal_overlayFederal authority (FAA) overlaps — federal_state_conflict possible where state-law density preemption conflicts with AIO height cap
federal_overlay_refsFAA Part 77 (14 CFR Part 77); DIA Noise Compatibility Plan
FP
Floodplain Regulations (South Platte / Cherry Creek / Sand Creek / Bear Creek)
FP
DRMC Ch. 56 (Floodplain Regulations) + FEMA SFHA

FEMA-mapped 100-year floodplain (Zone A/AE) + city-mapped floodways on South Platte River, Cherry Creek, Sand Creek, and Bear Creek. Triggered by FIRM panel location.

bfe_freeboardDenver requires freeboard above BFE per DRMC Ch. 56 for habitable structures (NFIP minimum +1 ft; confirm Denver-specific requirement)
floodway_prohibitionnew habitable structures prohibited in regulatory floodway
critical_facilitiescritical/essential facilities prohibited in 100-yr floodplain
basement_rulebasement finished floor must be above BFE+freeboard
nonresidential_floodproofingcommercial structures may dry-floodproof to BFE+freeboard in lieu of elevation
HP
Historic Preservation (Local Landmarks + Historic Districts)
HP
DRMC Ch. 30 (Landmark Preservation)

Map-based designation of individual local landmark properties and local historic districts (e.g., Curtis Park HD, Baker HD, Potter Highlands HD, Humboldt Street HD). Parallel regime outside DZC — administered by Denver Landmark Preservation Commission.

design_reviewLandmark Preservation Commission Certificate of Appropriateness required for exterior alterations to designated/contributing properties
demolition_reviewDemolition of designated-or-contributing resource requires LPC review + Council confirmation
non_designated_demo_review50+ year non-designated structures may trigger demolition review period per DRMC Ch. 30
adjacency_compatibilitynew construction adjacent to designated resources evaluated for height/massing compatibility
materials_standardsexterior materials/window patterns/roof form must be compatible with historic context
regime_locationDRMC Ch. 30 (Municipal Code) — separate from DZC (Zoning Code); cross-reference required

State preemptions

CO HB 24-1152 (ADU by-right statewide)applies
Qualifying condition
Denver population 716,577 (US Census PEP 2023 vintage); Denver is a member of the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) MPO. HB 24-1152 trigger: (is_in_mpo=true) OR (population≥1,000 AND is_in_connected_metro=true). Both arms satisfied. Denver has permitted ADUs by-right in most residential districts pre-state-law via DZC §11.8.2; state law now additionally mandates it and preempts any HOA covenant prohibitions.
Effect
ADUs permitted by-right in all residential zones where detached house is permitted. No owner-occupancy requirement. No discretionary review allowed. Design standards no more restrictive than primary structure permitted. Applies to detached, attached, and internal ADUs.
CO HB 24-1313 (Housing in Transit-Oriented Communities)applies
Qualifying condition
Denver is in DRCOG MPO (city.is_in_mpo=true). Denver has extensive high-frequency transit: 10+ RTD light rail stations within city limits (C/D/E/F/H/R/W lines), forthcoming Colfax Ave BRT (2027 target), and 15-min-or-better bus corridors on Federal Blvd, Colfax, Broadway, Colorado Blvd. parcel.in_transit_center_or_corridor=true for thousands of parcels within 1/2 mi of rail stations and 1/4 mi of high-frequency bus stops. Statute declared matter of statewide concern, binding on home-rule cities per bill text; Denver is home-rule per Colorado Constitution Art. XX.
Effect
Denver must designate Transit Centers and Transit Corridors, and zone them to permit a minimum 40 du/ac average density floor across the designated acreage. Duplexes required by-right in all SF-zoned residential land in MPO cities — affects U-SU, E-SU, S-SU SF district lines. Denver City Council work stream on TOC compliance in 2024-2025.
CO HB 24-1304 (Minimum Parking Requirements near transit)applies
Qualifying condition
Denver is in DRCOG MPO. parcel.within_quarter_mile_transit=true for thousands of Denver parcels on RTD light rail lines (C/D/E/F/H/N/R/W) and high-frequency bus corridors (Federal/Colfax/Broadway/Colorado Blvd/Colfax BRT corridor). HB 24-1304 trigger: (is_in_mpo=true) AND (parcel.within_quarter_mile_transit=true). Both satisfied.
Effect
No local minimum parking requirements for qualifying multifamily + mixed-use development within 1/4 mi of transit. Local parking maxima + design standards remain allowed. Also preempts lot-size minima that would block qualifying projects.
CO SB 24-174 (Strategic Growth and Housing Needs Planning)applies
Qualifying condition
Denver is in MPO (DRCOG) AND population 716,577 (Census PEP 2023) >> 1,000. Trigger satisfied via both OR-arms.
Effect
Denver must adopt a DOLA-coordinated Housing Needs Assessment + Housing Action Plan. Procedural preemption tied to state grant eligibility. Denver's Housing an Inclusive Denver + Expanding Housing Affordability programs partially align; formal SB 24-174 compliance requires DOLA-format deliverable.

Adopted building codes

Denver & state buildings; home rule elsewhere

IBC
Local adoption
IRC
2021
NEC
2023
IFC
Local
IECC (Residential)
Local
IECC (Commercial)
Local

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Quirks & notes

  • Denver DZC (2010) is the most developed form-based code among Colorado cities. Dimensional standards (height, setbacks, lot coverage) attach to Building Forms, not to districts. Reading a single 'setback' number per district is structurally wrong.
  • Block-Sensitive Primary Street Setback (DZC Tip Sheet 1): new residential primary structures must match the two nearest reference lots on the same block face — creating context-sensitive setbacks citywide rather than a uniform number per district.
  • Front 65% / Rear 35% zone lot division (§5.3): every residential zone lot formally divided into two height zones. In U-context: front zone 2.5 stories / 30 ft (with width bonus to 35 ft); rear zone 1 story / 17 ft. Unique in this study.
  • Height width bonus: +1 ft per 5 ft of lot width above 50 ft, max 35 ft front (§5.3). E.g., 60-ft-wide lot gains +2 ft to 32 ft front height.
  • ADU south-orientation rule (§11.8.2): ADUs >1 story or >17 ft must be placed abutting the southernmost side setback line to preserve solar access for the north neighbor. Unusual solar-rights protection built into ADU placement.
  • ADU footprint scales with lot size in U-SU-C1: <6,000 sf = 650 sf max; 6,000-7,000 sf = 864 sf max; >7,000 sf = 1,000 sf max. Graduated system rewarding larger lots.
  • 'Denver Double' — practice of building a large ADU in the backyard became popular after 2023 ADU relaxation; now real estate vernacular.
  • No rooftop decks in rear 35% in U-context (§5.3.5.2); permitted in G-context. Preserves neighbor backyard privacy.
  • E-SU-DX suffix = increased height at rear of property allowed (Urban Edge context). Readable directly from zone code.
  • D1 suffix (e.g., E-SU-D1) = ADU (cottage) permitted. Readable directly from zone code.
  • ADUs allowed by-right citywide in most residential districts per DZC §11.8.2, pre-dating HB 24-1152 state mandate. No design review required for standard ADUs.
  • Former Chapter 59 — a small set of properties still governed by the pre-2010 code (not DZC). Must check which code applies before analysis.
  • No FAR in Denver DZC residential districts — form-based frame uses height + setback + lot coverage only. FAR values in v1 were hallucinated.
  • Home-rule city under Colorado Constitution Article XX — state preemptions (HB 24-1152, HB 24-1313, HB 24-1304) explicitly apply to home-rule via statewide-concern declarations.

Formulas

Definitions

height
Measured grade to highest point of roof. In U- context residential: front 65% zone max 30 ft (2.5 stories), rear 35% zone max 17 ft (1 story); width bonus +1 ft per 5 ft of lot width above 50 ft; max 35 ft front [DZC §5.3].
lot_coverage
Building footprint / gross lot area, expressed as decimal. Varies by Building Form within district.
far
Not used in residential districts. DZC is form-based; density regulated via form + height + setback.
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross acre. Not explicitly capped in most residential districts; density emerges from minimum lot size + building form permissions.
setback_front
Per DZC Tip Sheet 1 (Block Sensitive Setbacks): new primary residential structure's front facade must not be closer to street than closest street-facing facade of primary structures on the TWO NEAREST reference lots on same block face. Minimum = lesser of two reference-lot setbacks. Administrative adjustment available.
setback_side
Varies by Building Form and Neighborhood Context; retrieve from applicable Context Article (3-8) Building Form table.
setback_rear
Varies by Building Form and Neighborhood Context. Rear 35% of zone lot triggers separate 1-story/17-ft height cap plus rear setback rules per §5.3.
parking
Not uniform per district; varies by use. Preempted to zero on qualifying MF/MU parcels within 1/4 mi transit per HB 24-1304.

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage (per applicable Building Form)
max_gfa_sf
NOT a function of FAR in Denver — constrained by form + height + setback envelope
buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2
buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft (block-sensitive front)
max_stories_approx
front 65%: max 2.5 stories / 30 ft + width bonus to 35 ft; rear 35%: 1 story / 17 ft [U- residential context §5.3]

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

—
—
Sort by —
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
◄
prev
►
next
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Primary source
Denver Zoning Code (DZC)
DZC adopted June 25, 2010; continuously amended through 2025 · retrieved 2026-04-19
Citations
  1. [1] z
  2. [2] z
  3. [3] z
  4. [4] §5.2.2
  5. [5] z
  6. [6] n
  7. [7] z
  8. [8] z
  9. [9] z
  10. [10] z
  11. [11] §5.2.2
  12. [12] z
  13. [13] n
  14. [14] z
  15. [15] z
  16. [16] z
  17. [17] z
  18. [18] §5.2.2
  19. [19] z
  20. [20] n
  21. [21] z
  22. [22] z
  23. [23] z
  24. [24] z
  25. [25] §5.2.2
  26. [26] z
  27. [27] n
  28. [28] z
  29. [29] z
  30. [30] z
  31. [31] z
  32. [32] §5.2.2
  33. [33] z
  34. [34] n
  35. [35] z
  36. [36] z
  37. [37] z
  38. [38] z
  39. [39] §5.2.2
  40. [40] z
  41. [41] n
  42. [42] z
  43. [43] z
  44. [44] z
  45. [45] z
  46. [46] §5.2.2
  47. [47] z
  48. [48] n
  49. [49] z
  50. [50] z
  51. [51] z
  52. [52] z
  53. [53] §5.2.2
  54. [54] z
  55. [55] n
  56. [56] z
  57. [57] z
  58. [58] z
  59. [59] z
  60. [60] §5.2.2
  61. [61] z
  62. [62] n
  63. [63] z
  64. [64] z
  65. [65] z
  66. [66] z
  67. [67] §5.2.2
  68. [68] z
  69. [69] n
  70. [70] z
  71. [71] z
  72. [72] z
  73. [73] z
  74. [74] §5.2.2
  75. [75] z
  76. [76] n
  77. [77] z
  78. [78] z
  79. [79] z
  80. [80] z
  81. [81] §5.2.2
  82. [82] z
  83. [83] n
  84. [84] z
  85. [85] z
  86. [86] z
  87. [87] z
  88. [88] §5.2.2
  89. [89] z
  90. [90] n
  91. [91] z
  92. [92] z
  93. [93] z
  94. [94] z
  95. [95] §5.2.2
  96. [96] z
  97. [97] n
  98. [98] z
  99. [99] z
  100. [100] z
  101. [101] z
  102. [102] §5.2.2
  103. [103] z
  104. [104] n
  105. [105] z
  106. [106] z
  107. [107] z
  108. [108] z
  109. [109] §5.2.2
  110. [110] z
  111. [111] n
  112. [112] z
  113. [113] z
  114. [114] z
  115. [115] z
  116. [116] z
  117. [117] §5.3
  118. [118] n
  119. [119] z
  120. [120] z
  121. [121] z
  122. [122] z
  123. [123] z
  124. [124] §5.3
  125. [125] n
  126. [126] z
  127. [127] z
  128. [128] z
  129. [129] z
  130. [130] z
  131. [131] §5.4
  132. [132] n
  133. [133] z
  134. [134] z
  135. [135] z
  136. [136] z
  137. [137] z
  138. [138] §5.4
  139. [139] n
  140. [140] z
  141. [141] z
  142. [142] z
  143. [143] z
  144. [144] z
  145. [145] §5.4
  146. [146] n
  147. [147] x
  148. [148] x
  149. [149] z
  150. [150] z
  151. [151] z
  152. [152] z
  153. [153] z
  154. [154] n
  155. [155] x
  156. [156] z
  157. [157] z
  158. [158] z
  159. [159] z
  160. [160] z
  161. [161] n
  162. [162] z
  163. [163] z
  164. [164] z
  165. [165] z
  166. [166] z
  167. [167] §4
  168. [168] n
  169. [169] z
  170. [170] z
  171. [171] z
  172. [172] z
  173. [173] z
  174. [174] §4
  175. [175] n
  176. [176] z
  177. [177] z
  178. [178] z
  179. [179] z
  180. [180] z
  181. [181] z
  182. [182] n
  183. [183] z
  184. [184] z
  185. [185] z
  186. [186] z
  187. [187] z
  188. [188] §3
  189. [189] n
  190. [190] z
  191. [191] z
  192. [192] z
  193. [193] z
  194. [194] z
  195. [195] z
  196. [196] n
  197. [197] x
  198. [198] x
  199. [199] z
  200. [200] z
  201. [201] z
  202. [202] z
  203. [203] z
  204. [204] n
  205. [205] z
  206. [206] z
  207. [207] z
  208. [208] z
  209. [209] z
  210. [210] z
  211. [211] n
  212. [212] x
  213. [213] x
  214. [214] z
  215. [215] z
  216. [216] z
  217. [217] z
  218. [218] z
  219. [219] n
  220. [220] x
  221. [221] x

Research status

Publication gates

primary url presentpassedhttps://www.denvergov.org/... is the city-hosted canonical; starts with https://; not an aggregator
no aggregator citedpassedNo Zoneomics/Steadily/SitePlanGuide/SitePlanCreator/Propwire/Zonara/Unzoned references; citations are DZC §, DRMC Ch., FAA Part 77, Colorado HB/SB bill URLs
confidence tags full formpassedAll confirmed values carry section citations (§5.2.2, §5.3, §11.8.2, §9.4.2-5, DRMC Ch. 30, DRMC Ch. 56); preempted fields carry preempting_law + preempted_value + preempted_effective_date triple; paired fields populated (not_captured carries not_captured_reason + quirks[] entry)
overlays have parameters trigger confidencepassedAll 6 overlays (CO, UO, DO, AIO, FP, HP) carry non-empty params, trigger, base_interaction, and citation
preempt section city specificpassedstate_preemptions_applicable[] is non-empty (4 entries); each has Denver-specific qualifying_condition_checked with numeric inputs (population 716,577 Census PEP 2023), MPO membership (DRCOG), and transit inventory (RTD rail C/D/E/F/H/R/W + Colfax BRT). NOT a link-stub.

Data quality

40%completeness32 confirmed12 partial
Documented gaps
  • not_captured_count (was 128): see standards with status=not_captured across districts
  • Full Building Form dimensional tables per district — Articles 3-8 of DZC PDF; would require table-level extraction from the Complete DZC PDF
  • Full enumeration of G- (General Urban), C- (Urban Center), D- (Downtown) districts — currently aliased; individual district rows when pipeline full-run budget allows
  • Block-Sensitive Setback worked examples per zone district — DZC Tip Sheet 1 provides methodology but city does not publish lookup tables
  • Conservation Overlay (CO) individual area parameters — each CO adopted via separate Council ordinance with area-specific provisions; not a single citywide parameter set
  • HB 24-1313 Transit Center designation map — pending Denver adoption as part of 2024-2025 TOC Action Plan work stream; re-research Q3 2026 for adopted TC boundaries
  • Former Chapter 59 parcel-level coverage map — need list of parcels not brought under DZC at 2010 adoption
  • Downtown (D-) context height caps — governed by a combination of base story caps + view-plane overlays + Downtown zone lot amenity rules; §8.3 table-level fetch deferred
  • Historic District boundaries (DRMC Ch. 30) — Curtis Park HD, Baker HD, Potter Highlands HD, Humboldt Street HD, etc. — need individual boundary maps for overlay trigger evaluation

Known issues

freshness:volatiledata:gaps-present

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.

AuroraColorado SpringsFort Collins