2024 HB 443 — Objective-Standards / Ministerial-Application Mandate (KY)

Tracked preemption from the Kentucky overlay bundle.

Overview

Effective
2025-07-01
Sunset
Authority
state
Scope
state:KY
Primary-source summary
2024 HB 443 — Objective standards / ministerial-application mandate

Trigger predicate

When this evaluates true for a parcel, the law's preempted fields take precedence over base zoning.

always true

Preempted fields

3 fields on the base district schema are rewritten when the trigger fires.

FieldOpValueNote
zoning_review.approval_criteria_must_be_objective_measurablerequireTrueZoning and subdivision approval criteria must be objective and measurable; applicants must be able to read approval standards off the page before submitting
zoning_review.ministerial_when_standards_objectiverequireTrueReview is ministerial where standards are objective; discretionary review survives only where Chapter 100 expressly authorizes it (e.g., map amendments under KRS 100.211–.213 retain comprehensive-plan / change-of-circumstance findings)
design_review.subjective_compatibility_or_character_findingswaiveConditioning approval on subjective compatibility, character, or aesthetic findings without an objective-standards backstop is potentially non-compliant with HB 443

Citation

Authority source
2024 HB 443 (Acts of 2024); amends KRS Chapter 100
§ KRS Chapter 100 (as amended by 2024 HB 443)
https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/record/24rs/hb443.html

Research notes

HB 443 constrains historically discretionary review pathways embedded in KRS 100 — conditional-use-permit findings, design review, and compatibility judgments — by requiring objective, measurable approval criteria. Locals retain authority to define the objective standards (no numeric floors or ceilings imposed). LFUCG ran a multi-tranche ZOTA to comply. Flag every KY city ordinance with subjective compatibility/character findings as potentially HB-443-non-compliant.