Georgia Military Installation & Airport Compatible-Use Zoning Review (GA)
Tracked preemption from the Georgia overlay bundle.
Overview
← All state preemptionsGeorgia overlay roll-upGeorgia zoning wikiGeorgia building codesFederal overlaysGlossaryFederal-conflict: Yes
Effective
2005-07-01
Sunset
—
Authority
state
Scope
state:GA
Other Georgia preemptions
Georgia Short-Term Rentals — No State PreemptionGeorgia Density / ADU / Design Review — No State PreemptionGeorgia Tree Canopy / Tree Ordinance — No Statewide PreemptionGeorgia Local Hazard Mitigation Plan — FEMA Stafford Act §322 ComplianceGeorgia Service Delivery Strategy Act (HB 489) — Intergovernmental Coordination MandateGeorgia Groundwater Recharge Area Protection — DCA Part V Environmental Planning CriteriaGeorgia Wetlands Protection — DCA Part V Environmental Planning CriteriaGeorgia Water Supply Watershed Protection — DCA Part V Environmental Planning Criteria
Trigger predicate
When this evaluates true for a parcel, the law's preempted fields take precedence over base zoning.
AND
city.military_installation_influence==Trueparcel.within_3000ft_of_military_base_or_airport==True
Preempted fields
3 fields on the base district schema are rewritten when the trigger fires.
| Field | Op | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
zoning_decision_procedure.requires_planning_department_investigation | override | True | Planning department must investigate and recommend on any proposed zoning decision for land within 3,000 ft of a military base or installation, or within the 3,000-ft Clear Zone or Accident Potential Zones I and II of a military airport |
zoning_decision_procedure.requires_military_installation_commander_consultation | override | True | Local planning department must request a written recommendation from the installation/airport commander at least 30 days prior to the hearing on the proposed zoning decision; commander recommendation must be considered (though not binding) |
zoning_decision_procedure.compatible_use_findings_required | override | True | Required findings include: suitability of use given proximity to base; effect on existing use of nearby property; safety/burden on streets, transportation, utilities, schools |
Citation
Authority source
O.C.G.A. §36-66-6 (Investigations and recommendations of planning department regarding land near military installation)
§ §36-66-6
Research notes
Procedural — requires consultation and investigation, not substantive denial. Distinct from federal AICUZ (DoDI 4165.57) and FAA Part 77 height surfaces, which are tracked separately under the federal-overlay conflict check. Affected GA installations: Fort Moore (formerly Fort Benning, Columbus), Fort Stewart (Hinesville/Liberty County), Robins AFB (Houston County / Warner Robins), Hunter Army Airfield (Savannah/Chatham), Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany, Moody AFB (Lowndes), Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay (Camden). Note: §36-66B addresses Mobile Broadband Infrastructure Leads to Development (BILD) — wireless siting, not military compatibility — and is intentionally not the cite for this overlay.