Minnesota Mineland Reclamation — Minn. Stat. § 93.44 et seq. (MN)

Tracked preemption from the Minnesota overlay bundle.

Overview

Effective
1969-05-26
Sunset
Authority
state
Scope
state:MN

Trigger predicate

When this evaluates true for a parcel, the law's preempted fields take precedence over base zoning.

parcel.has_active_mining_operation == True

Preempted fields

2 fields on the base district schema are rewritten when the trigger fires.

FieldOpValueNote
review_typerequirednr_permit_to_mine_and_reclamation_planOperators of nonferrous metallic-mineral (e.g., copper-nickel) and ferrous metallic-mineral (taconite) mining operations must obtain a DNR Permit to Mine and execute a reclamation plan under §§ 93.44–93.51 and Minn. R. Ch. 6130 (ferrous) / Ch. 6132 (nonferrous). Local zoning that purports to ban a state-permitted mining operation in conflict with the permit is preempted to the extent of conflict; siting and operational standards remain locally enforceable.
base_districts[*].allowed_usesrestrictmining_subject_to_state_permit_and_reclamation_surety

Citation

Authority source
Minn. Stat. §§ 93.44–93.51 (Mineland Reclamation); Minn. R. Ch. 6130 (ferrous mineland reclamation), Ch. 6132 (nonferrous metallic mineral mining)
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/93.44

Research notes

Conflict-preemption flavor — state Permit to Mine is the gating instrument, with local zoning retaining siting/operational authority. Affects the Iron Range taconite operations (US Steel Minntac, Hibbing Taconite, ArcelorMittal Minorca, Cleveland-Cliffs UTAC, NorthShore Mining) and pending nonferrous proposals (PolyMet/NewRange, Twin Metals — the latter halted by the 2023 BWCAW mineral withdrawal).